Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17262 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to analyze the efficiency and agreement between coprological techniques in the diagnosis of enteroparasites in patients with HIV in the Upper Pantanal. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed from 28 patients with the HIV virus, in which the techniques used were spontaneous sedimentation, the centrifugal-fluctuation method in sucrose solution and the technique with Safranin staining. In Hoffman's technique, the greatest positivity of enteroparasites was that observed for the protozoan Blastocystis spp. the frequency of 52.38% is common, followed by Giardia lamblia with 21.47%. In Sheather the greatest positivity was also Blastocystis spp. 63.8%, followed by Giardia lamblia 33.33%. The technique using the Safranina dye possible identification of four protozoa that were not visualized in the sedimentation and flotation techniques. The principle that the flotation and sedimentation techniques differ in the diagnosis is not consistent with the results observed in this study, given that both techniques were efficient in detecting protozoa, such as Blastocystis spp. and Giardia lamblia, regardless of whether or not they are in saturated solutions. Therefore, to ensure better results, the association of techniques always results in greater reliability, especially when using different fundamental techniques. |
id |
UNIFEI_ab5ce33b0ce9c78266f535815b65b247 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17262 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanalComparación de técnicas de diagnóstico enteroparasitario en pacientes VIH positivos del pantanal superiorComparação de técnicas no diagnóstico enteroparasitário em pacientes HIV positivo no alto pantanalHoffmanSheatherSafraninaExamen de hecesPacientes inmunodeficientes.HoffmanSheatherSafraninaExame coproparasitológicoPacientes imunodeficiêntes.HoffmanSheatherSafraninaCoproparasitological examinationImmunodeficient patients.The objective of this study was to analyze the efficiency and agreement between coprological techniques in the diagnosis of enteroparasites in patients with HIV in the Upper Pantanal. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed from 28 patients with the HIV virus, in which the techniques used were spontaneous sedimentation, the centrifugal-fluctuation method in sucrose solution and the technique with Safranin staining. In Hoffman's technique, the greatest positivity of enteroparasites was that observed for the protozoan Blastocystis spp. the frequency of 52.38% is common, followed by Giardia lamblia with 21.47%. In Sheather the greatest positivity was also Blastocystis spp. 63.8%, followed by Giardia lamblia 33.33%. The technique using the Safranina dye possible identification of four protozoa that were not visualized in the sedimentation and flotation techniques. The principle that the flotation and sedimentation techniques differ in the diagnosis is not consistent with the results observed in this study, given that both techniques were efficient in detecting protozoa, such as Blastocystis spp. and Giardia lamblia, regardless of whether or not they are in saturated solutions. Therefore, to ensure better results, the association of techniques always results in greater reliability, especially when using different fundamental techniques.El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la frecuencia de muestras positivas entre técnicas coprológicas en el diagnóstico de parásitos intestinales en pacientes con el virus del VIH en el Alto Pantanal. Se recolectaron y analizaron muestras de heces de 28 pacientes con el virus del VIH, en las cuales las técnicas empleadas fueron la sedimentación espontánea, el método de centrifugación-flotación en solución de sacarosa y la técnica con tinción con safranina. En la técnica de Hoffman, la mayor positividad de enteroparásitos se observó para el protozoo Blastocystis spp. común la frecuencia de 52,38%, seguida de Giardia lamblia con 21,47%. En Sheather, la positividad más alta también fue Blastocystis spp. 63,8%, seguida de Giardia lamblia 33,33%. La técnica que utiliza el colorante Safranina permite la identificación de cuatro protozoos que no fueron visualizados en las técnicas de sedimentación y flotación. El principio de que las técnicas de fluctuación y sedimentación difieren en el diagnóstico no concuerda con los resultados observados en este estudio, considerando que ambas técnicas fueron eficientes en la detección de protozoos, como Blastocystis spp. y Giardia lamblia, independientemente de si se encuentran en soluciones saturadas o no. Por tanto, para asegurar un mejor resultado, la asociación de técnicas siempre da como resultado una mayor fiabilidad, especialmente cuando se utilizan técnicas con diferentes fundamentos.O objetivo desse estudo foi analisar frequencia de amostras positivas entre técnicas coprológicas no diagnóstico de enteroparasitas em pacientes portadores do vírus HIV no Alto Pantanal. Foram coletadas e analisadas amostras fecais de 28 pacientes portadores do vírus HIV, em que as técnicas utilizadas foi a de sedimentação espontânea, método de centrífugo-flutuação em solução de sacarose e a técnica com coloração de Safranina. Na técnica de Hoffman a maior positividade de enteroparasitas foi a observada para o protozoário Blastocystis spp. comum a frequência de 52,38%, seguido por Giardia lamblia com 21,47%. Em Sheather a maior positividade também foi Blastocystis spp. 63,8%, seguido por Giardia lamblia 33,33%. A técnica utilizando o corante de Safranina possível identificação de quatro protozoários que não foram visualizados nas técnicas de sedimentação e flutuação. O princípio que diferem as técnicas de flutuação e sedimentação no diagnóstico não condiz com os resultados observados nesse estudo, tendo em vista que ambas as técnicas apresentaram eficiência na detecção de protozoários, como o Blastocystis spp. e Giardia lamblia, independentemente de estarem ou não em soluções saturadas. Sendo assim, para garantir melhor resultado, a associação de técnicas resulta sempre em maior confiabilidade, principalmente quando se utilizam técnicas de fundamentos diferentes.Research, Society and Development2021-07-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1726210.33448/rsd-v10i8.17262Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e30510817262Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e30510817262Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e305108172622525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17262/15519Copyright (c) 2021 Marta dos Santos Miranda de Araújo; Andernice dos Santos Zanetti; Larissa Nayara Lima Silva; Lucas França de Barros; Bianca Teshima de Alencar; Mayara dos Santos Araújo; Antonio Francisco Malheiroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Marta dos Santos Miranda de Zanetti, Andernice dos Santos Silva, Larissa Nayara Lima Barros, Lucas França de Alencar, Bianca Teshima de Araújo, Mayara dos Santos Malheiros, Antonio Francisco 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17262Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:38.549511Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal Comparación de técnicas de diagnóstico enteroparasitario en pacientes VIH positivos del pantanal superior Comparação de técnicas no diagnóstico enteroparasitário em pacientes HIV positivo no alto pantanal |
title |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal Araújo, Marta dos Santos Miranda de Hoffman Sheather Safranina Examen de heces Pacientes inmunodeficientes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Exame coproparasitológico Pacientes imunodeficiêntes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Coproparasitological examination Immunodeficient patients. |
title_short |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
title_full |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
title_sort |
Comparison of techniques in enteroparasitary diagnosis in HIV positive patients at the high pantanal |
author |
Araújo, Marta dos Santos Miranda de |
author_facet |
Araújo, Marta dos Santos Miranda de Zanetti, Andernice dos Santos Silva, Larissa Nayara Lima Barros, Lucas França de Alencar, Bianca Teshima de Araújo, Mayara dos Santos Malheiros, Antonio Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zanetti, Andernice dos Santos Silva, Larissa Nayara Lima Barros, Lucas França de Alencar, Bianca Teshima de Araújo, Mayara dos Santos Malheiros, Antonio Francisco |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Marta dos Santos Miranda de Zanetti, Andernice dos Santos Silva, Larissa Nayara Lima Barros, Lucas França de Alencar, Bianca Teshima de Araújo, Mayara dos Santos Malheiros, Antonio Francisco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hoffman Sheather Safranina Examen de heces Pacientes inmunodeficientes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Exame coproparasitológico Pacientes imunodeficiêntes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Coproparasitological examination Immunodeficient patients. |
topic |
Hoffman Sheather Safranina Examen de heces Pacientes inmunodeficientes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Exame coproparasitológico Pacientes imunodeficiêntes. Hoffman Sheather Safranina Coproparasitological examination Immunodeficient patients. |
description |
The objective of this study was to analyze the efficiency and agreement between coprological techniques in the diagnosis of enteroparasites in patients with HIV in the Upper Pantanal. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed from 28 patients with the HIV virus, in which the techniques used were spontaneous sedimentation, the centrifugal-fluctuation method in sucrose solution and the technique with Safranin staining. In Hoffman's technique, the greatest positivity of enteroparasites was that observed for the protozoan Blastocystis spp. the frequency of 52.38% is common, followed by Giardia lamblia with 21.47%. In Sheather the greatest positivity was also Blastocystis spp. 63.8%, followed by Giardia lamblia 33.33%. The technique using the Safranina dye possible identification of four protozoa that were not visualized in the sedimentation and flotation techniques. The principle that the flotation and sedimentation techniques differ in the diagnosis is not consistent with the results observed in this study, given that both techniques were efficient in detecting protozoa, such as Blastocystis spp. and Giardia lamblia, regardless of whether or not they are in saturated solutions. Therefore, to ensure better results, the association of techniques always results in greater reliability, especially when using different fundamental techniques. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17262 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17262 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17262 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17262 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17262/15519 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e30510817262 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e30510817262 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e30510817262 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052681836036096 |