Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460 |
Resumo: | The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day. |
id |
UNIFEI_621406f40a8adad5c8313db7235c4d45 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23460 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris LumbricoidesEvaluación de sensibilidad de métodos frescos directos y de Hoffman para Ascaris LumbricoidesAvaliação da sensibilidade dos métodos direto à fresco e Hoffman para Ascaris LumbricoidesDireto a frescoHoffmanSedimentação espontâneaSensibilidade. Straight to freshHoffmanSpontaneous sedimentationSensitivity. Directo a frescoHoffmanSedimentación espontáneaSensibilidad.The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day.El diagnóstico de laboratorio de ascariasis se realiza a través del Examen Parasitológico de Heces (EPF), que investiga la presencia de huevos de Ascaris lumbricoides en las heces. El Método Hoffman se basa en la sedimentación espontánea y permite la concentración de huevos, quistes, ooquistes y larvas de numerosas especies mediante la sedimentación gravitacional de una muestra fecal. Y el examen directo en fresco permite la identificación de protozoos (trofozoítos y quistes) y helmintos (huevos, larvas y pequeños adultos). Objetivo: Comparar la sensibilidad de los métodos de laboratorio de fresco directo y Hoffman en el campo de la parasitología. Metodología: La búsqueda de artículos científicos se realizó en bases de datos electrónicas: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS), Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina e Instituto Nacional de Salud (Pubmed). Publicaciones de 2015 a 2021, en portugués, español e inglés. Resultados y Discusión: El examen fresco directo y la técnica de Hoffman, Pons y Janer o Lutz (HPJL) son los métodos de laboratorio más utilizados, ya que estas técnicas tienen como principal ventaja la mínima necesidad de materiales y recursos económicos. Sin embargo, la desventaja es que hay una gran cantidad de desechos fecales en el sedimento, lo que dificulta la preparación y el examen microscópico. Consideraciones finales: Fresh Direct y Hofmman, cuando se usan juntos, aumentan la probabilidad de diagnósticos reales y confiables, especialmente en el diagnóstico de huevos y quistes de helmintos, pero separados, cada uno tiene mayor sensibilidad en casos específicos. Debido a la escasez de estudios comparativos de estos dos métodos, es evidente y vale la pena sugerir una mayor investigación al respecto, ya que estos métodos son tan importantes en el diagnóstico de enfermedades parasitarias, que se han convertido en un problema de salud pública, pero debido a la dificultad. diagnóstico termina siendo descuidado en nuestro día a día.O diagnóstico laboratorial da ascaridíase se dá através do Exame Parasitológico de Fezes (EPF), onde é pesquisado a presença de ovos do Ascaris lumbricoides nas fezes. O Método Hoffman se fundamenta na sedimentação espontânea e permite a concentração de ovos, cistos, oocistos e larvas de inúmeras espécies por meio de uma sedimentação gravitacional de uma amostra fecal. E o Exame Direto a Fresco, permite a identificação de protozoários (trofozoítas e cistos) e de helmintos (ovos, larvas e pequenos adultos). Objetivo: Comparar a sensibilidade dos métodos laboratoriais direto a fresco e de Hoffman na área de Parasitologia. Metodologia: A busca de artigos científicos foi realizada nas bases de dados eletrônicas: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Literatura Latino-Americana em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publicações de 2015 a 2021, em idiomas português, espanhol e inglês. Resultados e Discussão: O exame direto a fresco e a técnica de Hoffman, Pons e Janer ou Lutz (HPJL) são os métodos laboratoriais mais utilizados, pois estas técnicas têm como principal vantagem a necessidade mínima de materiais e recursos financeiros. Porém a desvantagem é de apresentar uma grande quantidade de detritos fecais no sedimento, dificultando a preparação e o exame microscópico. Considerações Finais: Direto a fresco e Hofmman, quando utilizados em conjunto aumentam as probabilidades de diagnósticos reais e confiáveis, principalmente no diagnóstico de ovos e cistos de helmintos, porém separados cada um possui maior sensibilidade em casos específicos. Pela escassez de estudos comparativos destes dois métodos, fica evidente e vale a sugestão de mais pesquisas nesse sentido, uma vez que estes métodos se apresentam tão importantes no diagnóstico das parasitoses, que têm se tornado uma questão de saúde pública, porém pelo difícil diagnóstico acaba sendo negligenciada no nosso dia a dia.Research, Society and Development2021-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2346010.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e496101523460Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e496101523460Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e4961015234602525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460/20293Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Juniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha, Isaias Pinheiro da Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins 2021-12-06T10:13:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23460Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:19.450176Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides Evaluación de sensibilidad de métodos frescos directos y de Hoffman para Ascaris Lumbricoides Avaliação da sensibilidade dos métodos direto à fresco e Hoffman para Ascaris Lumbricoides |
title |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
spellingShingle |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da Direto a fresco Hoffman Sedimentação espontânea Sensibilidade. Straight to fresh Hoffman Spontaneous sedimentation Sensitivity. Directo a fresco Hoffman Sedimentación espontánea Sensibilidad. |
title_short |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
title_full |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
title_fullStr |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
title_sort |
Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides |
author |
Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da |
author_facet |
Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direto a fresco Hoffman Sedimentação espontânea Sensibilidade. Straight to fresh Hoffman Spontaneous sedimentation Sensitivity. Directo a fresco Hoffman Sedimentación espontánea Sensibilidad. |
topic |
Direto a fresco Hoffman Sedimentação espontânea Sensibilidade. Straight to fresh Hoffman Spontaneous sedimentation Sensitivity. Directo a fresco Hoffman Sedimentación espontánea Sensibilidad. |
description |
The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460/20293 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Junior https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Junior https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e496101523460 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e496101523460 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e496101523460 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052697966280704 |