The duty of analytical reasoning in Civil Procedure and the bridges with the theory of legal argumentation

• Autor(a) principal: D Aviz, Maristela Aparecida Siqueira
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Medina, José Miguel Garcia
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
• Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24385
• topic: Teoría del Derecho; Proceso civil; Teoría de la decisión judicial; Deber de justificación analítica; Teorías de la argumentación jurídica.; Teoria do direito; Processo civil; Teoria da decisão judicial; Dever de fundamentação analítica; Teorias da argumentação jurídica.; Theory of law; Civil procedure; Judicial decision theory; Duty of analytical rationale; Theories of legal argumentation.

The present work is guided by the need to investigate the importance of theories of legal argumentation for the application of the duty of analytical reasoning formed by the governing norms of the Code of Civil Procedure, dogmatized by the concern to guarantee rationality to judicial decisions. Thus, starting from studies and bibliographical research, it finds the construction of a discussion that encompasses the concept of sentence in our contemporary paradigm of guardianship of rights, in the Democratic State, delimiting the legitimizing role of the Judiciary. Still, it addresses the formation of a duty of analytical reasoning, based on the duty of collaboration, as a meta-criterion of validity of the reasons justifying the court decision. In the end, it concludes for the importance of theories of argumentation, stating that the identification of the context of justification, outlined by its scholars, has contributed to dogmatics, meeting the concerns of rationality in arguments and, as a result, criteria of control and legal certainty.