Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Clara de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bonci, Mário Mendes, Baroni, Francisco de Assis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30716
Resumo: The first step in the collection of microbiological samples is the selection of techniques to be used, which guarantees a higher yield of microorganisms and a more assertive identification of them. Considering the scarcity of studies related to the presence of yeasts in the canine oral cavity, this work broached the comparison between techniques of collection of the canine oral cavity already used and not yet used in 18 dogs treated at the Hospital Veterinário de Animais de Companhia (UFRRJ) and private clinics of the adjacencies. The purpose of this comparative study is to stimulate research for the standardization of the canine oral microbiome and to expand knowledge about the yeasts present in this microbiota. Therefore, the following instruments were compared for sample collection: swab, filter paper and commercial human toothbrush. The technique that demonstrated the greater use of the sample and less microbial loss was the use of a toothbrush. Therefore, it was concluded that the most effective collection of yeasts from the canine oral cavity was the commercial human toothbrush, recommended for future trials.
id UNIFEI_b2fae736ebb1644c6d8e251395205072
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30716
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavitySelección de técnica para la recoleccion de levaduras de la cavidad oral caninaSeleção de técnica para coleta de leveduras da cavidade oral caninaEstudo ComparativoColeta AmostralMicrobiotaExperimento.Estudio ComparativoColección de MuestraMicrobiotaExperimento.Comparative StudySample CollectionMicrobiotaExperiment.The first step in the collection of microbiological samples is the selection of techniques to be used, which guarantees a higher yield of microorganisms and a more assertive identification of them. Considering the scarcity of studies related to the presence of yeasts in the canine oral cavity, this work broached the comparison between techniques of collection of the canine oral cavity already used and not yet used in 18 dogs treated at the Hospital Veterinário de Animais de Companhia (UFRRJ) and private clinics of the adjacencies. The purpose of this comparative study is to stimulate research for the standardization of the canine oral microbiome and to expand knowledge about the yeasts present in this microbiota. Therefore, the following instruments were compared for sample collection: swab, filter paper and commercial human toothbrush. The technique that demonstrated the greater use of the sample and less microbial loss was the use of a toothbrush. Therefore, it was concluded that the most effective collection of yeasts from the canine oral cavity was the commercial human toothbrush, recommended for future trials.El primer paso en la toma de muestras microbiológicas es la selección de las técnicas a utilizar, lo que garantiza un mejor aprovechamiento de los microorganismos y una identificación más asertiva de los mismos. Considerando la escasez de estudios relacionados con la presencia de levaduras en la cavidad bucal canina, este trabajo abordó la comparación entre técnicas de recolección de la cavidad bucal canina ya utilizadas y aún no utilizadas en 18 perros atendidos en el Hospital Veterinário de Animais de Companhia (UFRRJ) y clínicas privadas de las adyacencias. El propósito de este estudio comparativo es estimular la investigación para la estandarización del microbioma oral canino y ampliar el conocimiento sobre las levaduras presentes en esta microbiota. Por lo tanto, se compararon los siguientes instrumentos para la recolección de muestras: hisopo, papel de filtro y cepillo de dientes humano comercial. La técnica que demostró mayor aprovechamiento de la muestra y menor pérdida microbiana fue el uso de cepillo de dientes. Por lo tanto, se concluyó que el instrumento de recolección más efectivo para la recolección de levaduras de la cavidad bucal canina fue el cepillo dental humano comercial, recomendado para futuros ensayos.O primeiro passo para a coleta de amostras microbiológicas é a seleção entre técnicas a serem utilizadas, o que garante um maior aproveitamento dos micro-organismos e uma identificação mais assertiva dos mesmos. Pensando na escassez de estudos relacionados à presença de leveduras na cavidade oral canina, esse trabalho abordou a comparação entre técnicas de coletas da cavidade oral canina já utilizadas e ainda não utilizadas em 18 cães atendidos no Hospital Veterinário de Animais de Companhia da UFRRJ e clínicas particulares das adjacências. A finalidade desse estudo comparativo é estimular pesquisas para a padronização do microbioma oral canino e ampliar conhecimentos sobre as leveduras presentes nessa microbiota. Para tanto, foram comparados os seguintes instrumentos para colheita de amostras: swab, papel filtro e escova de dente comercial humana. A técnica que demonstrou maior aproveitamento de amostra e menor perda microbiana foi o uso da escova de dentes. Sendo assim, concluiu-se que o instrumento de coleta mais eficaz para a coleta de leveduras da cavidade oral canina foi a escova de dentes comercial humana, recomendada para ensaios futuros.Research, Society and Development2022-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3071610.33448/rsd-v11i8.30716Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e14911830716Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e14911830716Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e149118307162525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30716/26358Copyright (c) 2022 Clara de Almeida Mendes; Mário Mendes Bonci; Francisco de Assis Baronihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Clara de Almeida Bonci, Mário MendesBaroni, Francisco de Assis2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30716Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:22.993663Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
Selección de técnica para la recoleccion de levaduras de la cavidad oral canina
Seleção de técnica para coleta de leveduras da cavidade oral canina
title Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
spellingShingle Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
Mendes, Clara de Almeida
Estudo Comparativo
Coleta Amostral
Microbiota
Experimento.
Estudio Comparativo
Colección de Muestra
Microbiota
Experimento.
Comparative Study
Sample Collection
Microbiota
Experiment.
title_short Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
title_full Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
title_fullStr Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
title_full_unstemmed Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
title_sort Selection of technique for yeast collection from the canine oral cavity
author Mendes, Clara de Almeida
author_facet Mendes, Clara de Almeida
Bonci, Mário Mendes
Baroni, Francisco de Assis
author_role author
author2 Bonci, Mário Mendes
Baroni, Francisco de Assis
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Clara de Almeida
Bonci, Mário Mendes
Baroni, Francisco de Assis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estudo Comparativo
Coleta Amostral
Microbiota
Experimento.
Estudio Comparativo
Colección de Muestra
Microbiota
Experimento.
Comparative Study
Sample Collection
Microbiota
Experiment.
topic Estudo Comparativo
Coleta Amostral
Microbiota
Experimento.
Estudio Comparativo
Colección de Muestra
Microbiota
Experimento.
Comparative Study
Sample Collection
Microbiota
Experiment.
description The first step in the collection of microbiological samples is the selection of techniques to be used, which guarantees a higher yield of microorganisms and a more assertive identification of them. Considering the scarcity of studies related to the presence of yeasts in the canine oral cavity, this work broached the comparison between techniques of collection of the canine oral cavity already used and not yet used in 18 dogs treated at the Hospital Veterinário de Animais de Companhia (UFRRJ) and private clinics of the adjacencies. The purpose of this comparative study is to stimulate research for the standardization of the canine oral microbiome and to expand knowledge about the yeasts present in this microbiota. Therefore, the following instruments were compared for sample collection: swab, filter paper and commercial human toothbrush. The technique that demonstrated the greater use of the sample and less microbial loss was the use of a toothbrush. Therefore, it was concluded that the most effective collection of yeasts from the canine oral cavity was the commercial human toothbrush, recommended for future trials.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30716
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30716
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30716
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30716
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30716/26358
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Clara de Almeida Mendes; Mário Mendes Bonci; Francisco de Assis Baroni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Clara de Almeida Mendes; Mário Mendes Bonci; Francisco de Assis Baroni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e14911830716
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e14911830716
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e14911830716
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052826648576000