Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159 |
Resumo: | This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting. |
id |
UNIFEI_bad4f77d64dcea047bad6222c845aa78 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27159 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic reviewTecnologías de enfermería para la seguridad del paciente en cuidados intensivos: revisión sistemáticaTecnologias de enfermagem para a segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: revisão sistemáticaTechnologyNursing CarePatient SafetyRiskIntensive Care Units.TecnologiaAtención de EnfermeriaSeguridad del PacienteRiesgoUnidades de Cuidados Intensivos.TecnologiaCuidados de EnfermagemSegurança do PacienteRiscoUnidades de Terapia Intensiva.This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting.Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar evidencias de que las tecnologías de atención de enfermería garantizan la seguridad de los pacientes ingresados en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Revisión sistemática con búsqueda en seis bases de datos. Dos investigadores seleccionaron los textos de forma independiente en el primer paso; y, en el segundo, en una reunión de conciliación, los conflictos fueron analizados por un tercer investigador. Para evaluar la concordancia, se aplicó el coeficiente Kappa; para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y clasificar los niveles de evidencia, se adoptó el Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Los estudios observacionales también se evaluaron con el riesgo de sesgo con el risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Se evaluó la calidad de la evidencia en los 23 estudios incluidos, donde se determinó la clasificación con evidencia muy baja para la mayoría de los estudios (16/69,6%), evidencia moderada para cinco estudios (21,7%), un estudio con evidencia baja (4,3%) y un estudio con evidencia alta (4,3%). La seguridad del paciente es esencial, pero, a pesar de este compromiso, solo un estudio (4,3%), sobre la evaluación de la termometría, presentó un alto nivel de evidencia de que las tecnologías de atención de enfermería garantizan la seguridad de los pacientes en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.Este artigo teve por objetivo demonstrar as evidências de que tecnologias de cuidado de enfermagem garantem a segurança do paciente internado em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Revisão sistemática com busca em seis bases de dados. Dois investigadores selecionaram os textos de forma independente na primeira etapa; e, na segunda, em reunião de conciliação, os conflitos foram analisados por um terceiro pesquisador. Para avaliação da concordância, aplicou-se o coeficiente Kappa; para avaliação do risco de viés e classificação dos níveis de evidência, adotou-se o Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Os estudos observacionais também foram avaliados com o risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Os 23 estudos incluídos foram avaliados quanto a qualidade da evidência, sendo que, o ranqueamento com muito baixa evidência foi determinado para a maioria dos estudos (16/ 69,6%), evidência moderada para cinco estudos (21,7%), um estudo com baixa evidência (4,3%) e um estudo como alta evidência (4,3%). A segurança do paciente é fundamental, mas, apesar desse compromisso, apenas um estudo (4,3%), acerca da avaliação de termometria, apresentou alto nível de evidência de que as tecnologias de cuidado de enfermagem garantem a segurança do paciente na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva.Research, Society and Development2022-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2715910.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e10711427159Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e10711427159Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e107114271592525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159/23715Copyright (c) 2022 Sayonara de Fátima Faria Barbosa; Stefhanie Conceição de Jesus; Graziele Telles Vieira; Kátia Cilene Godinho Bertoncello; Samuel William Porter; Sandra Valenzuela-Suazo; Varinia Alejandra Rodríguez-Campo; Maria de Lourdes de Souzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Sayonara de Fátima FariaJesus, Stefhanie Conceição deVieira, Graziele Telles Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene GodinhoPorter, Samuel WilliamValenzuela-Suazo, SandraRodríguez-Campo, Varinia AlejandraSouza, Maria de Lourdes de2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27159Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:58.708405Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review Tecnologías de enfermería para la seguridad del paciente en cuidados intensivos: revisión sistemática Tecnologias de enfermagem para a segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: revisão sistemática |
title |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria Technology Nursing Care Patient Safety Risk Intensive Care Units. Tecnologia Atención de Enfermeria Seguridad del Paciente Riesgo Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Tecnologia Cuidados de Enfermagem Segurança do Paciente Risco Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. |
title_short |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
title_full |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review |
author |
Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de Vieira, Graziele Telles Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho Porter, Samuel William Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra Souza, Maria de Lourdes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de Vieira, Graziele Telles Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho Porter, Samuel William Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra Souza, Maria de Lourdes de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de Vieira, Graziele Telles Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho Porter, Samuel William Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra Souza, Maria de Lourdes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Technology Nursing Care Patient Safety Risk Intensive Care Units. Tecnologia Atención de Enfermeria Seguridad del Paciente Riesgo Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Tecnologia Cuidados de Enfermagem Segurança do Paciente Risco Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. |
topic |
Technology Nursing Care Patient Safety Risk Intensive Care Units. Tecnologia Atención de Enfermeria Seguridad del Paciente Riesgo Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Tecnologia Cuidados de Enfermagem Segurança do Paciente Risco Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. |
description |
This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159/23715 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e10711427159 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e10711427159 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e10711427159 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052793419202560 |