Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de, Vieira, Graziele Telles, Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho, Porter, Samuel William, Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra, Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra, Souza, Maria de Lourdes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159
Resumo: This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting.
id UNIFEI_bad4f77d64dcea047bad6222c845aa78
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27159
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic reviewTecnologías de enfermería para la seguridad del paciente en cuidados intensivos: revisión sistemáticaTecnologias de enfermagem para a segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: revisão sistemáticaTechnologyNursing CarePatient SafetyRiskIntensive Care Units.TecnologiaAtención de EnfermeriaSeguridad del PacienteRiesgoUnidades de Cuidados Intensivos.TecnologiaCuidados de EnfermagemSegurança do PacienteRiscoUnidades de Terapia Intensiva.This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting.Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar evidencias de que las tecnologías de atención de enfermería garantizan la seguridad de los pacientes ingresados en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Revisión sistemática con búsqueda en seis bases de datos. Dos investigadores seleccionaron los textos de forma independiente en el primer paso; y, en el segundo, en una reunión de conciliación, los conflictos fueron analizados por un tercer investigador. Para evaluar la concordancia, se aplicó el coeficiente Kappa; para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y clasificar los niveles de evidencia, se adoptó el Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Los estudios observacionales también se evaluaron con el riesgo de sesgo con el risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Se evaluó la calidad de la evidencia en los 23 estudios incluidos, donde se determinó la clasificación con evidencia muy baja para la mayoría de los estudios (16/69,6%), evidencia moderada para cinco estudios (21,7%), un estudio con evidencia baja (4,3%) y un estudio con evidencia alta (4,3%). La seguridad del paciente es esencial, pero, a pesar de este compromiso, solo un estudio (4,3%), sobre la evaluación de la termometría, presentó un alto nivel de evidencia de que las tecnologías de atención de enfermería garantizan la seguridad de los pacientes en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.Este artigo teve por objetivo demonstrar as evidências de que tecnologias de cuidado de enfermagem garantem a segurança do paciente internado em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Revisão sistemática com busca em seis bases de dados. Dois investigadores selecionaram os textos de forma independente na primeira etapa; e, na segunda, em reunião de conciliação, os conflitos foram analisados por um terceiro pesquisador. Para avaliação da concordância, aplicou-se o coeficiente Kappa; para avaliação do risco de viés e classificação dos níveis de evidência, adotou-se o Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Os estudos observacionais também foram avaliados com o risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Os 23 estudos incluídos foram avaliados quanto a qualidade da evidência, sendo que, o ranqueamento com muito baixa evidência foi determinado para a maioria dos estudos (16/ 69,6%), evidência moderada para cinco estudos (21,7%), um estudo com baixa evidência (4,3%) e um estudo como alta evidência (4,3%). A segurança do paciente é fundamental, mas, apesar desse compromisso, apenas um estudo (4,3%), acerca da avaliação de termometria, apresentou alto nível de evidência de que as tecnologias de cuidado de enfermagem garantem a segurança do paciente na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva.Research, Society and Development2022-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2715910.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e10711427159Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e10711427159Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e107114271592525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159/23715Copyright (c) 2022 Sayonara de Fátima Faria Barbosa; Stefhanie Conceição de Jesus; Graziele Telles Vieira; Kátia Cilene Godinho Bertoncello; Samuel William Porter; Sandra Valenzuela-Suazo; Varinia Alejandra Rodríguez-Campo; Maria de Lourdes de Souzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Sayonara de Fátima FariaJesus, Stefhanie Conceição deVieira, Graziele Telles Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene GodinhoPorter, Samuel WilliamValenzuela-Suazo, SandraRodríguez-Campo, Varinia AlejandraSouza, Maria de Lourdes de2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27159Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:58.708405Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
Tecnologías de enfermería para la seguridad del paciente en cuidados intensivos: revisión sistemática
Tecnologias de enfermagem para a segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: revisão sistemática
title Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
spellingShingle Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria
Technology
Nursing Care
Patient Safety
Risk
Intensive Care Units.
Tecnologia
Atención de Enfermeria
Seguridad del Paciente
Riesgo
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.
Tecnologia
Cuidados de Enfermagem
Segurança do Paciente
Risco
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva.
title_short Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
title_full Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
title_sort Nursing technologies for patient safety in intensive care: a systematic review
author Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria
author_facet Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria
Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de
Vieira, Graziele Telles
Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho
Porter, Samuel William
Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra
Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra
Souza, Maria de Lourdes de
author_role author
author2 Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de
Vieira, Graziele Telles
Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho
Porter, Samuel William
Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra
Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra
Souza, Maria de Lourdes de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima Faria
Jesus, Stefhanie Conceição de
Vieira, Graziele Telles
Bertoncello, Kátia Cilene Godinho
Porter, Samuel William
Valenzuela-Suazo, Sandra
Rodríguez-Campo, Varinia Alejandra
Souza, Maria de Lourdes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Technology
Nursing Care
Patient Safety
Risk
Intensive Care Units.
Tecnologia
Atención de Enfermeria
Seguridad del Paciente
Riesgo
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.
Tecnologia
Cuidados de Enfermagem
Segurança do Paciente
Risco
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva.
topic Technology
Nursing Care
Patient Safety
Risk
Intensive Care Units.
Tecnologia
Atención de Enfermeria
Seguridad del Paciente
Riesgo
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.
Tecnologia
Cuidados de Enfermagem
Segurança do Paciente
Risco
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva.
description This article aims to demonstrate the evidence that nursing care technologies ensure the safety of patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Systematic review with search in six databases. Two researchers selected the texts independently in the first stage; and, in the second stage, in a conciliation meeting, the conflicts were analyzed by a third researcher. In order to evaluate the level of agreement, the Kappa coefficient was applied; in order to evaluate the risk of bias and classify the levels of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was adopted. Observational studies were also evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. The 23 included studies were evaluated regarding their quality of evidence, with very low evidence ranking determined for most studies (16/69.6%), moderate evidence for five studies (21.7%), one study with low evidence (4.3%) and one study as high evidence (4.3%). Patient safety is essential, but, despite this commitment, only one study (4.3%), about thermometry assessment, showed high level of evidence that nursing care technologies ensure patient safety in the Intensive Care Unit setting.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27159
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27159/23715
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e10711427159
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e10711427159
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e10711427159
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052793419202560