To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Alana Carine Sobrinho
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Marlene Soares da, Amaral, Samea da Silva, Queiroz, Leonardo Oliveira de, Pereira , André Ricardo dos Santos, Abreu, Valdemir Silva, Costa Neto, Wilson Vieira da, Rabelo, Fernando Galvão, Araújo, Nadiane Munhoz, Cantuária, Patrick de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22537
Resumo: With the aim of investigating the use of fire in rural community in Amapá, characterizing the productive models, of alternative family farmers, understanding how they construct a change in the production model, as well as reproduce their empirical knowledge. Agricultural properties were assessed between August and September 2019. The study had as strategy the "exploratory research," carried out through questionnaire with 20 farmers. The data obtained was tabulated, analyzed and grouped with Microsoft Excel 2010 ® and Minitab filter. The system of overthrow and burning still adopted. The change in farmer practices on land use has been gradually changed. The option for fire use is related to cost reduction in cleaning the productive area. Of the 85% of farmers surveyed, they reported that they do not use fire as a cleaning technique, but data differ from information obtained through satellite imaging. The culture of cassava is one of the main ones. Farmers (90%) know the advantages of ash for plants and soil. As for the disadvantage of fire (55%) say they have knowledge, however it was observed, that they do not know the Legislation. Techniques to avoid deforestation and burns such as: use of the same area by stew, ploughing and grading, in addition to care such as soil conservation, rotating crops with legumes, direct planting and more productive varieties, were also observed. It is necessary that public policies be implemented, aiming to reduce the cost of recovery of the area with sustainable and cheaper practices.
id UNIFEI_bf6bec9e01f7ed4be7c52c11b80e8226
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22537
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP¿Quemar o no quemar? Un estudio de caso de la finca sin quemar en la comunidad de São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/APQueimar ou não queimar? Um estudo de caso da roça sem queima na comunidade São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP Agricultural managementFamily farmingFire. Agricultura familiarFuegoManejo agrícola.Agricultura familiarFogoManejo agrícola.With the aim of investigating the use of fire in rural community in Amapá, characterizing the productive models, of alternative family farmers, understanding how they construct a change in the production model, as well as reproduce their empirical knowledge. Agricultural properties were assessed between August and September 2019. The study had as strategy the "exploratory research," carried out through questionnaire with 20 farmers. The data obtained was tabulated, analyzed and grouped with Microsoft Excel 2010 ® and Minitab filter. The system of overthrow and burning still adopted. The change in farmer practices on land use has been gradually changed. The option for fire use is related to cost reduction in cleaning the productive area. Of the 85% of farmers surveyed, they reported that they do not use fire as a cleaning technique, but data differ from information obtained through satellite imaging. The culture of cassava is one of the main ones. Farmers (90%) know the advantages of ash for plants and soil. As for the disadvantage of fire (55%) say they have knowledge, however it was observed, that they do not know the Legislation. Techniques to avoid deforestation and burns such as: use of the same area by stew, ploughing and grading, in addition to care such as soil conservation, rotating crops with legumes, direct planting and more productive varieties, were also observed. It is necessary that public policies be implemented, aiming to reduce the cost of recovery of the area with sustainable and cheaper practices.Con el objetivo de investigar el uso del fuego en la comunidad rural de Amapá, caracterizar los modelos productivos, de agricultores familiares alternativos, entender cómo construyen un cambio en el modelo productivo, así como reproducir sus conocimientos empíricos. Las propiedades agrícolas fueron evaluadas entre agosto y septiembre de 2019. El estudio tuvo como estrategia la «investigación exploratoria», realizada a través de cuestionario con 20 agricultores. Los datos obtenidos fueron tabulados, analizados y agrupados con filtro Microsoft Excel 2010 ® y Minitab. El sistema de derrocamiento y quema sigue siendo adoptado. El cambio en las prácticas de los agricultores sobre el uso de la tierra se ha modificado gradualmente. La opción para el uso de incendios está relacionada con la reducción de costos en la limpieza del área productiva. Del 85% de los agricultores encuestados, informaron que no utilizan el fuego como técnica de limpieza, pero los datos difieren de la información obtenida a través de imágenes satelitales. La cultura de la yuca es una de las principales. Los agricultores (90%) conocen las ventajas de la ceniza para las plantas y el suelo. En cuanto a la desventaja del fuego (55%) dicen tener conocimiento, sin embargo se observó, de que no conocen la Legislación. También se observaron técnicas para evitar la deforestación y quemaduras como: uso de la misma zona por estofado, arado y clasificación, además de cuidados como conservación del suelo, cultivos rotatorios con legumbres, siembra directa y variedades más productivas. Es necesario que se implementen políticas públicas, con el objetivo de reducir el costo de recuperación de la zona con prácticas sostenibles y más baratas.Com o objetivo de investigar o uso do fogo em comunidade rural no Amapá, caracterizando os modelos produtivos, dos agricultores familiares alternativos, compreendendo como constroem uma mudança no modelo de produção, bem como reproduzem seus conhecimentos empíricos. Foram avaliadas propriedades agrícolas entre Agosto e Setembro de 2019. O estudo teve como estratégia a “pesquisa exploratória”, realizada através de questionário com 20 agricultores. Os dados obtidos foram tabulados, analisados e agrupados com Microsoft Excel 2010® e filtro Minitab. O sistema de derruba e queima ainda adotada. A mudança das práticas dos agricultores sobre o uso do solo, vem sendo modificada paulatinamente. A opção pelo uso do fogo está relacionada com redução de custos na limpeza da área produtiva. Dos 85% dos agricultores entrevistados informaram que não utilizam o fogo como técnica de limpeza, contudo dados estes divergem das informações obtidas através de imagem de satélites. A cultura da mandioca desponta como uma das principais. Os agricultores (90%) conhecem as vantagens das cinzas para as plantas e o solo. Quanto a desvantagem do do fogo (55%) dizem ter conhecimento, contudo observou-se, que desconhecem a Legislação. Técnicas para evitar desmatamentos e queimadas como: utilização da mesma área por destoca, aração e gradagem, além de cuidados como a conservação de solos, efetuando rotação de cultivos com leguminosas, plantio direto e variedades mais produtivas, foram também observadas. É necessário que políticas públicas sejam implementadas, objetivando reduzir o custo de recuperação da área com práticas sustentáveis e mais baratas.Research, Society and Development2021-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2253710.33448/rsd-v10i16.22537Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e155101622537Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e155101622537Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e1551016225372525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22537/20726Copyright (c) 2021 Alana Carine Sobrinho Soares; Marlene Soares da Silva; Samea da Silva Amaral; Leonardo Oliveira de Queiroz; André Ricardo dos Santos Pereira ; Valdemir Silva Abreu; Wilson Vieira da Costa Neto; Fernando Galvão Rabelo; Nadiane Munhoz Araújo; Patrick de Castro Cantuáriahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Alana Carine Sobrinho Silva, Marlene Soares da Amaral, Samea da Silva Queiroz, Leonardo Oliveira de Pereira , André Ricardo dos Santos Abreu, Valdemir Silva Costa Neto, Wilson Vieira da Rabelo, Fernando GalvãoAraújo, Nadiane Munhoz Cantuária, Patrick de Castro 2021-12-20T11:03:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22537Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:41:40.541718Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
¿Quemar o no quemar? Un estudio de caso de la finca sin quemar en la comunidad de São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
Queimar ou não queimar? Um estudo de caso da roça sem queima na comunidade São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
title To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
spellingShingle To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
Soares, Alana Carine Sobrinho
Agricultural management
Family farming
Fire.
Agricultura familiar
Fuego
Manejo agrícola.
Agricultura familiar
Fogo
Manejo agrícola.
title_short To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
title_full To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
title_fullStr To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
title_full_unstemmed To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
title_sort To burn or not to burn? A case study of the unburned farm in the community of São Sebastião do Livramento-Cutias/AP
author Soares, Alana Carine Sobrinho
author_facet Soares, Alana Carine Sobrinho
Silva, Marlene Soares da
Amaral, Samea da Silva
Queiroz, Leonardo Oliveira de
Pereira , André Ricardo dos Santos
Abreu, Valdemir Silva
Costa Neto, Wilson Vieira da
Rabelo, Fernando Galvão
Araújo, Nadiane Munhoz
Cantuária, Patrick de Castro
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marlene Soares da
Amaral, Samea da Silva
Queiroz, Leonardo Oliveira de
Pereira , André Ricardo dos Santos
Abreu, Valdemir Silva
Costa Neto, Wilson Vieira da
Rabelo, Fernando Galvão
Araújo, Nadiane Munhoz
Cantuária, Patrick de Castro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Alana Carine Sobrinho
Silva, Marlene Soares da
Amaral, Samea da Silva
Queiroz, Leonardo Oliveira de
Pereira , André Ricardo dos Santos
Abreu, Valdemir Silva
Costa Neto, Wilson Vieira da
Rabelo, Fernando Galvão
Araújo, Nadiane Munhoz
Cantuária, Patrick de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural management
Family farming
Fire.
Agricultura familiar
Fuego
Manejo agrícola.
Agricultura familiar
Fogo
Manejo agrícola.
topic Agricultural management
Family farming
Fire.
Agricultura familiar
Fuego
Manejo agrícola.
Agricultura familiar
Fogo
Manejo agrícola.
description With the aim of investigating the use of fire in rural community in Amapá, characterizing the productive models, of alternative family farmers, understanding how they construct a change in the production model, as well as reproduce their empirical knowledge. Agricultural properties were assessed between August and September 2019. The study had as strategy the "exploratory research," carried out through questionnaire with 20 farmers. The data obtained was tabulated, analyzed and grouped with Microsoft Excel 2010 ® and Minitab filter. The system of overthrow and burning still adopted. The change in farmer practices on land use has been gradually changed. The option for fire use is related to cost reduction in cleaning the productive area. Of the 85% of farmers surveyed, they reported that they do not use fire as a cleaning technique, but data differ from information obtained through satellite imaging. The culture of cassava is one of the main ones. Farmers (90%) know the advantages of ash for plants and soil. As for the disadvantage of fire (55%) say they have knowledge, however it was observed, that they do not know the Legislation. Techniques to avoid deforestation and burns such as: use of the same area by stew, ploughing and grading, in addition to care such as soil conservation, rotating crops with legumes, direct planting and more productive varieties, were also observed. It is necessary that public policies be implemented, aiming to reduce the cost of recovery of the area with sustainable and cheaper practices.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22537
10.33448/rsd-v10i16.22537
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22537
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.22537
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22537/20726
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e155101622537
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e155101622537
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e155101622537
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052695177068544