Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5721 |
Resumo: | Objective: To analyze, through the systematic review method, the technological products developed by Nurses, published between 2014 and 2018. Methodology: Qualitative systematic review of articles published from 2014 to 2018 in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Technological productions focused on the hospital environment were listed. Technological production was classified according to: complexity, innovation content, impact and applicability based on the criteria determined by the Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (Brazil). Results: 28 studies were selected. The most frequent technological productions were: manual/protocol and software/application (28.57%, respectively), teaching material (25%) and non-patentable process/technology (17.86%). There was a greater distribution of technological productions classified as medium complexity (78.6%); medium content of innovation (57.1%); the description of the impact was recurrent in software/application (60%), didactic material and non-patentable process/technology (12.5%, respectively) and, regarding the manual/protocol, the impact was not reported by the authors. The applicability was not clear in the studies, being interpreted from the profile of the production presented. Conclusion: There were more frequent technological productions of manuals/protocols and software/applications. There is a lack of description as to the applicability and impact (real or potential) of productions aimed at the hospital environment. |
id |
UNIFEI_c5612970655b946108818ab312309a4f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5721 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic reviewProducciones tecnológicas desarrolladas por Enfermería: revisión sistemáticaProduções tecnológicas desenvolvidas por Enfermagem: revisão sistemáticaEnfermagemAtividades científicas e tecnológicaAvaliação de tecnologia biomédicaAssistência hospitalarEnfermeiraActividades científicas y tecnológicasEvaluación de la Tecnología BiomédicaAtención Hospitalaria.NursingScientific and technical activitiesTechnology AssessmentBiomedicalHospital Care.Objective: To analyze, through the systematic review method, the technological products developed by Nurses, published between 2014 and 2018. Methodology: Qualitative systematic review of articles published from 2014 to 2018 in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Technological productions focused on the hospital environment were listed. Technological production was classified according to: complexity, innovation content, impact and applicability based on the criteria determined by the Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (Brazil). Results: 28 studies were selected. The most frequent technological productions were: manual/protocol and software/application (28.57%, respectively), teaching material (25%) and non-patentable process/technology (17.86%). There was a greater distribution of technological productions classified as medium complexity (78.6%); medium content of innovation (57.1%); the description of the impact was recurrent in software/application (60%), didactic material and non-patentable process/technology (12.5%, respectively) and, regarding the manual/protocol, the impact was not reported by the authors. The applicability was not clear in the studies, being interpreted from the profile of the production presented. Conclusion: There were more frequent technological productions of manuals/protocols and software/applications. There is a lack of description as to the applicability and impact (real or potential) of productions aimed at the hospital environment.Objetivo: analizar, usando el método de revisión sistemática, los productos tecnológicos desarrollados por enfermeras, publicados entre 2014 y 2018. Metodología: revisión sistemática cualitativa de artículos publicados de 2014 a 2018 en inglés, portugués y español. Se seleccionaron producciones tecnológicas dirigidas al entorno hospitalario. La producción tecnológica se clasificó según: complejidad, contenido de innovación, impacto y aplicabilidad en función de los criterios determinados por la Coordinación de Mejora de Personal de Nivel Superior (Brasil). Resultados: Se seleccionaron 28 estudios. Las producciones tecnológicas más frecuentes fueron: manual/protocolo y software/aplicación (28.57%, respectivamente), material didáctico (25%) y tecnología/proceso no patentable (17.86%). Hubo una mayor distribución de producciones tecnológicas clasificadas como de mediana complejidad (78,6%); contenido medio de innovación (57,1%); la descripción del impacto fue recurrente en software/aplicación (60%), material didáctico y proceso/tecnología no patentable (12.5%, respectivamente) y, con respecto al manual/protocolo, los autores no informaron el impacto. La aplicabilidad no fue clara en los estudios, siendo interpretada a partir del perfil de la producción presentada. Conclusión: Hubo producciones tecnológicas más frecuentes de manuales/protocolos y software/aplicaciones. Hay una falta de descripción de la aplicabilidad y el impacto (real o potencial) de las producciones dirigidas al sistema hospitalario.Objetivo: Analisar, através do método de revisão sistemática, os produtos tecnológicos desenvolvidos por Enfermeiros, publicados no período de 2014 e 2018. Metodologia: Revisão sistemática qualitativa de artigos publicados do período de 2014 a 2018 no idioma inglês, português e espanhol. Foram elencadas produções tecnológicas voltadas ao ambiente hospitalar. A produção tecnológica foi classificada quanto: complexidade, teor de inovação, impacto e aplicabilidade com base nos critérios determinados pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brasil). Resultados: Foram selecionados 28 estudos. As produções tecnológicas mais frequentes foram: manual/protocolo e software/aplicativo (28,57%, respectivamente), material didático (25%) e processo/tecnologia não patenteável (17,86%). Houve maior distribuição de produções tecnológicas classificadas em média complexidade (78,6%); médio teor de inovação (57,1%); a descrição do impacto foi recorrente em software/aplicativo (60%), material didático e processo/tecnologia não patenteável (12,5%, respectivamente) e, referente a manual/protocolo, o impacto não foi reportado pelos autores. A aplicabilidade não se demonstrou clara nos estudos, sendo interpretada a partir do perfil da produção apresentada. Conclusão: Foram mais frequentes produções tecnológicas de manuais/protocolos e softwares/aplicativo. Observa-se carência de descrição quanto a aplicabilidade e impacto (real ou potencial) das produções voltadas ao ambiente hospitalar.Research, Society and Development2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/572110.33448/rsd-v9i8.5721Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e224985721Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e224985721Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e2249857212525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5721/4688Copyright (c) 2020 Sara Soares Ferreira da Silva, Julya de Araújo Silva Monteiro, Letícia Rezende da Silva, Marianna Ramos Francisco, Yuri Zoel Brasil, Danielle Galdino de Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Sara Soares Ferreira daMonteiro, Júlya de Araujo SilvaSilva, Letícia Rezende daFrancisco, Marianna RamosBrasil, Yuri ZoelPaula, Danielle Galdino de2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5721Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:09.007925Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review Producciones tecnológicas desarrolladas por Enfermería: revisión sistemática Produções tecnológicas desenvolvidas por Enfermagem: revisão sistemática |
title |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review Silva, Sara Soares Ferreira da Enfermagem Atividades científicas e tecnológica Avaliação de tecnologia biomédica Assistência hospitalar Enfermeira Actividades científicas y tecnológicas Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica Atención Hospitalaria. Nursing Scientific and technical activities Technology Assessment Biomedical Hospital Care. |
title_short |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
title_full |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
title_sort |
Technological productions developed by Nursing: systematic review |
author |
Silva, Sara Soares Ferreira da |
author_facet |
Silva, Sara Soares Ferreira da Monteiro, Júlya de Araujo Silva Silva, Letícia Rezende da Francisco, Marianna Ramos Brasil, Yuri Zoel Paula, Danielle Galdino de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monteiro, Júlya de Araujo Silva Silva, Letícia Rezende da Francisco, Marianna Ramos Brasil, Yuri Zoel Paula, Danielle Galdino de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Sara Soares Ferreira da Monteiro, Júlya de Araujo Silva Silva, Letícia Rezende da Francisco, Marianna Ramos Brasil, Yuri Zoel Paula, Danielle Galdino de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Enfermagem Atividades científicas e tecnológica Avaliação de tecnologia biomédica Assistência hospitalar Enfermeira Actividades científicas y tecnológicas Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica Atención Hospitalaria. Nursing Scientific and technical activities Technology Assessment Biomedical Hospital Care. |
topic |
Enfermagem Atividades científicas e tecnológica Avaliação de tecnologia biomédica Assistência hospitalar Enfermeira Actividades científicas y tecnológicas Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica Atención Hospitalaria. Nursing Scientific and technical activities Technology Assessment Biomedical Hospital Care. |
description |
Objective: To analyze, through the systematic review method, the technological products developed by Nurses, published between 2014 and 2018. Methodology: Qualitative systematic review of articles published from 2014 to 2018 in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Technological productions focused on the hospital environment were listed. Technological production was classified according to: complexity, innovation content, impact and applicability based on the criteria determined by the Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (Brazil). Results: 28 studies were selected. The most frequent technological productions were: manual/protocol and software/application (28.57%, respectively), teaching material (25%) and non-patentable process/technology (17.86%). There was a greater distribution of technological productions classified as medium complexity (78.6%); medium content of innovation (57.1%); the description of the impact was recurrent in software/application (60%), didactic material and non-patentable process/technology (12.5%, respectively) and, regarding the manual/protocol, the impact was not reported by the authors. The applicability was not clear in the studies, being interpreted from the profile of the production presented. Conclusion: There were more frequent technological productions of manuals/protocols and software/applications. There is a lack of description as to the applicability and impact (real or potential) of productions aimed at the hospital environment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5721 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5721 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5721 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5721 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5721/4688 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e224985721 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e224985721 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e224985721 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052653322108928 |