Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089 |
Resumo: | Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect. |
id |
UNIFEI_df5ad70f1a4610d4a473600dce8c39f5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20089 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavityActividad del propóleo rojo en el control de bacterias en la cavidad bucalAtividade da Própolis Vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oralPropóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico.Actividad antibacterialFitoterápicoPropóleos.AntibacterialsPropolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap.Herbal MedicinesPropolis.Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos.AntibacterianosFitoterápicosPrópolis.Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control ). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.Produtos de fonte de naturais estão sendo estudado para preservar a saúde humana, inclusive para prevenir doenças orais, pelo fato de medicamentos industrializados poderem acarretar resistência bacteriana e efeitos adversos. A própolis vermelha uma substância resinosa e complexa, de origem natural produzida pelas abelhas, têm propriedades terapêuticas, como atividade antimicrobiana e anti-inflamatória. O objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar o efeito antibacteriano da própolis vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oral e os objetivos específicos foram comparar o efeito da própolis com efeito da clorexidina e determinar em quais cepas bacterianas a própolis apresentava maior eficácia. Utilizou-se cepas de Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) e Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923). A atividade antimicrobiana da própolis foi determinada pelo método de difusão em ágar com a técnica de poços. Os poços foram preenchidos com 40 µL das soluções de clorexidina 0,12% (controle positivo), própolis vermelha em concentrações de 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0,12%, 0,012% e água destilada (controle negativo). Os testes aconteceram em triplicata e a análise estatística foi realizada através do teste T de Student. Os dados foram organizados em tabelas e gráficos para a demonstração dos resultados obtidos. Considerou-se como significantes valores de p <0,05. Observou-se que a própolis de maneira geral apresentou efetividade semelhante ao da clorexidina em bactérias Gram-positivas. Pode-se concluir que a própolis vermelha em suas variadas concentrações, apresentaram efeitos antimicrobianos. Sua efetividade foi tão boa quanto o da clorexidina em bactérias Gram-positivas e em bactérias Gram-negativas não houve efeito inibitório.Research, Society and Development2021-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2008910.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e58101420089Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e58101420089Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e581014200892525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089/19334Copyright (c) 2021 Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Silva; Helena Maria Reinaldo Lima; Francisco Laurindo da Silva; Francisco das Chagas Araújo Sousa; Wenderson Costa da Silva; Liana Cynthia de Macedo Reis; Marcos André Arrais de Sousa; Alice de Castro Cruz Pimentel; Daniel Rodrigues Furtado; Augusto Cesar Evelin Rodrigues; Adrielle Martins Monteiro Alves; Renan Paraguassu de Sá Rodrigues; Amanda Laurindo Monteirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Lima, Helena Maria ReinaldoSilva, Francisco Laurindo da Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo Silva, Wenderson Costa da Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar EvelinAlves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo 2021-12-04T11:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20089Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:50.042120Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity Actividad del propóleo rojo en el control de bacterias en la cavidad bucal Atividade da Própolis Vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oral |
title |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
spellingShingle |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico. Actividad antibacterial Fitoterápico Propóleos. Antibacterials Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap. Herbal Medicines Propolis. Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos. Antibacterianos Fitoterápicos Própolis. |
title_short |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
title_full |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
title_fullStr |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
title_sort |
Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity |
author |
Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da |
author_facet |
Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo Silva, Francisco Laurindo da Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo Silva, Wenderson Costa da Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo Silva, Francisco Laurindo da Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo Silva, Wenderson Costa da Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo Silva, Francisco Laurindo da Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo Silva, Wenderson Costa da Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico. Actividad antibacterial Fitoterápico Propóleos. Antibacterials Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap. Herbal Medicines Propolis. Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos. Antibacterianos Fitoterápicos Própolis. |
topic |
Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico. Actividad antibacterial Fitoterápico Propóleos. Antibacterials Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap. Herbal Medicines Propolis. Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos. Antibacterianos Fitoterápicos Própolis. |
description |
Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089/19334 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e58101420089 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e58101420089 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e58101420089 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052689102667776 |