Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo, Silva, Francisco Laurindo da, Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo, Silva, Wenderson Costa da, Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo, Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de, Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz, Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues, Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin, Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro, Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá, Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089
Resumo: Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values ​​of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.
id UNIFEI_df5ad70f1a4610d4a473600dce8c39f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20089
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavityActividad del propóleo rojo en el control de bacterias en la cavidad bucalAtividade da Própolis Vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oralPropóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico.Actividad antibacterialFitoterápicoPropóleos.AntibacterialsPropolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap.Herbal MedicinesPropolis.Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos.AntibacterianosFitoterápicosPrópolis.Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values ​​of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control ). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values ​​of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.Produtos de fonte de naturais estão sendo estudado para preservar a saúde humana, inclusive para prevenir doenças orais, pelo fato de medicamentos industrializados poderem acarretar resistência bacteriana e efeitos adversos. A própolis vermelha uma substância resinosa e complexa, de origem natural produzida pelas abelhas, têm propriedades terapêuticas, como atividade antimicrobiana e anti-inflamatória. O objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar o efeito antibacteriano da própolis vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oral e os objetivos específicos foram comparar o efeito da própolis com efeito da clorexidina e determinar em quais cepas bacterianas a própolis apresentava maior eficácia. Utilizou-se cepas de Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) e Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923). A atividade antimicrobiana da própolis foi determinada pelo método de difusão em ágar com a técnica de poços. Os poços foram preenchidos com 40 µL das soluções de clorexidina 0,12% (controle positivo), própolis vermelha em concentrações de 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0,12%, 0,012% e água destilada (controle negativo). Os testes aconteceram em triplicata e a análise estatística foi realizada através do teste T de Student. Os dados foram organizados em tabelas e gráficos para a demonstração dos resultados obtidos. Considerou-se como significantes valores de p <0,05. Observou-se que a própolis de maneira geral apresentou efetividade semelhante ao da clorexidina em bactérias Gram-positivas. Pode-se concluir que a própolis vermelha em suas variadas concentrações, apresentaram efeitos antimicrobianos. Sua efetividade foi tão boa quanto o da clorexidina em bactérias Gram-positivas e em bactérias Gram-negativas não houve efeito inibitório.Research, Society and Development2021-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2008910.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e58101420089Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e58101420089Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e581014200892525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089/19334Copyright (c) 2021 Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Silva; Helena Maria Reinaldo Lima; Francisco Laurindo da Silva; Francisco das Chagas Araújo Sousa; Wenderson Costa da Silva; Liana Cynthia de Macedo Reis; Marcos André Arrais de Sousa; Alice de Castro Cruz Pimentel; Daniel Rodrigues Furtado; Augusto Cesar Evelin Rodrigues; Adrielle Martins Monteiro Alves; Renan Paraguassu de Sá Rodrigues; Amanda Laurindo Monteirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da Lima, Helena Maria ReinaldoSilva, Francisco Laurindo da Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo Silva, Wenderson Costa da Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar EvelinAlves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo 2021-12-04T11:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20089Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:50.042120Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
Actividad del propóleo rojo en el control de bacterias en la cavidad bucal
Atividade da Própolis Vermelha no controle de bactérias da cavidade oral
title Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
spellingShingle Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da
Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico.
Actividad antibacterial
Fitoterápico
Propóleos.
Antibacterials
Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap.
Herbal Medicines
Propolis.
Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos.
Antibacterianos
Fitoterápicos
Própolis.
title_short Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
title_full Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
title_fullStr Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
title_full_unstemmed Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
title_sort Activity of Red Propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity
author Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da
author_facet Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da
Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo
Silva, Francisco Laurindo da
Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo
Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de
Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz
Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues
Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin
Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro
Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá
Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo
author_role author
author2 Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo
Silva, Francisco Laurindo da
Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo
Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de
Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz
Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues
Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin
Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro
Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá
Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Daniela Caroline Barbosa da
Lima, Helena Maria Reinaldo
Silva, Francisco Laurindo da
Sousa, Francisco das Chagas Araújo
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Reis, Liana Cynthia de Macedo
Sousa, Marcos André Arrais de
Pimentel, Alice de Castro Cruz
Furtado, Daniel Rodrigues
Rodrigues, Augusto Cesar Evelin
Alves, Adrielle Martins Monteiro
Rodrigues, Renan Paraguassu de Sá
Monteiro, Amanda Laurindo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico.
Actividad antibacterial
Fitoterápico
Propóleos.
Antibacterials
Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap.
Herbal Medicines
Propolis.
Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos.
Antibacterianos
Fitoterápicos
Própolis.
topic Propóleos; Actividad antibacterial; Fitoterápico.
Actividad antibacterial
Fitoterápico
Propóleos.
Antibacterials
Propolis; Antibacterial activity; Phytotherap.
Herbal Medicines
Propolis.
Própolis; Antibacterianos; Fitoterápicos.
Antibacterianos
Fitoterápicos
Própolis.
description Natural-source products are being studied to preserve human health, including to prevent oral diseases, because industrialized drugs can cause bacterial resistance and adverse effects. Red propolis, a resinous and complex substance, of natural origin produced by bees, has therapeutic properties such as antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this work was to verify the antibacterial effect of red propolis in the control of bacteria in the oral cavity and the specific objectives were to compare the effect of propolis with the effect of chlorhexidine and determine in which bacterial strains propolis was more effective. Strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC-25922), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25923) were used. The antimicrobial activity of propolis was determined by the agar diffusion method with the well technique. The wells were filled with 40 µL of 0.12% chlorhexidine solutions (positive control), red propolis in concentrations of 12%, 6%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.12%, 0.012% and distilled water (negative control). Tests were performed in triplicate and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Data were organized into tables and graphs to demonstrate the results obtained. Values ​​of p <0.05 were considered significant. It was observed that propolis in general showed similar effectiveness to chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria. It can be concluded that red propolis in its varied concentrations had antimicrobial effects. Its effectiveness was as good as that of chlorhexidine in Gram-positive bacteria and in Gram-negative bacteria there was no inhibitory effect.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089
10.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.20089
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20089/19334
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e58101420089
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e58101420089
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e58101420089
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052689102667776