Stakeholders in the context of smart cities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Jefferson Cirne da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Storópoli, José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931
Resumo: In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities.
id UNIFEI_dffd2f89f569013d941a9b91b1a9b707
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11931
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Stakeholders in the context of smart citiesGrupos de interés no contexto das smart citiesStakeholders no contexto das smart citiesStakeholdersCidades inteligentesHélice quádruplaRevisão sistemática.Partes intresadasCiudades inteligentesHélice cuádrupleRevisión sistemática.StakeholdersSmart citiesQuadrupal helixSystematic review.In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities.En 2050, el 70% de la población mundial vivirá en ciudades, presionando a la gestión para que se vuelva inteligente y los actores ganen relevancia e interés como objeto de estudio, comenzando a disputar el protagonismo en estos territorios. No hemos identificado estudios que reconozcan a estas partes interesadas en las ciudades inteligentes. El objetivo era identificarlos, así como sus atributos y su relevancia. Realizamos una revisión sistemática de la literatura y obtuvimos 82 documentos finales. Como resultado, la sociedad civil fue el actor más citado, seguida de las industrias / empresas, seguida de los gobiernos y, finalmente, de la academia / universidades. Los resultados, tanto por región geográfica de estudio como por formación académica de los autores, hacen referencia al mismo resultado. No identificamos ninguna mención de la relevancia y los atributos de las partes interesadas en las ciudades inteligentes, lo que indica una brecha científica que se estudiará en el futuro. La docencia y la investigación fue el segmento menos significativo entre los actores, lo que indica la necesidad de incluir a este grupo como protagonistas activos en este proceso. Concluimos que la sociedad civil debe involucrarse de manera efectiva en estas iniciativas de ciudades inteligentes, después de todo, estos son los principales accionistas de estas ciudades.Em 2050, 70% da população mundial viverá em cidades, pressionando as gestões a tornarem-se inteligentes e os stakeholders ganham relevância e interesse enquanto objeto de estudo, passando a disputar o protagonismo nestes territórios. Não identificamos estudos que reconheçam estes stakeholders nas cidades inteligentes. O objetivo foi identificá-los, bem como os seus atributos e a sua saliência. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática da literatura e obtivemos 82 documentos finais. Como resultado, a sociedade civil foi o stakeholder mais citado, seguido pelas indústrias/companhias, na sequência pelos governos e, por último, pela academia/universidades. Os resultados, tanto por região geográfica de estudo quanto pela formação acadêmica dos autores, remetem ao mesmo resultado. Não identificamos menção à saliência e aos atributos dos stakeholders das smart cities, indicando lacuna científica a ser futuramente estudada. Ensino e pesquisa foi o segmento menos significativo entre os stakeholders, indicando a necessidade de inserção deste grupo como protagonistas ativos neste processo.  Concluimos que a sociedade civil carece de ser efetivamente envolvida nestas iniciativas de smart cities, afinal de contas, seriam estes os principais acionistas destas cidades.Research, Society and Development2021-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1193110.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e44410111931Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e44410111931Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e444101119312525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931/10807Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópolihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Jefferson Cirne daStorópoli, José2021-02-20T21:19:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11931Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:38.402388Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
Grupos de interés no contexto das smart cities
Stakeholders no contexto das smart cities
title Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
spellingShingle Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
Costa, Jefferson Cirne da
Stakeholders
Cidades inteligentes
Hélice quádrupla
Revisão sistemática.
Partes intresadas
Ciudades inteligentes
Hélice cuádruple
Revisión sistemática.
Stakeholders
Smart cities
Quadrupal helix
Systematic review.
title_short Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
title_full Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
title_fullStr Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
title_sort Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
author Costa, Jefferson Cirne da
author_facet Costa, Jefferson Cirne da
Storópoli, José
author_role author
author2 Storópoli, José
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Jefferson Cirne da
Storópoli, José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stakeholders
Cidades inteligentes
Hélice quádrupla
Revisão sistemática.
Partes intresadas
Ciudades inteligentes
Hélice cuádruple
Revisión sistemática.
Stakeholders
Smart cities
Quadrupal helix
Systematic review.
topic Stakeholders
Cidades inteligentes
Hélice quádrupla
Revisão sistemática.
Partes intresadas
Ciudades inteligentes
Hélice cuádruple
Revisión sistemática.
Stakeholders
Smart cities
Quadrupal helix
Systematic review.
description In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931
10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931/10807
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópoli
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópoli
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e44410111931
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e44410111931
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e44410111931
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052668686893056