Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931 |
Resumo: | In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities. |
id |
UNIFEI_dffd2f89f569013d941a9b91b1a9b707 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11931 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Stakeholders in the context of smart citiesGrupos de interés no contexto das smart citiesStakeholders no contexto das smart citiesStakeholdersCidades inteligentesHélice quádruplaRevisão sistemática.Partes intresadasCiudades inteligentesHélice cuádrupleRevisión sistemática.StakeholdersSmart citiesQuadrupal helixSystematic review.In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities.En 2050, el 70% de la población mundial vivirá en ciudades, presionando a la gestión para que se vuelva inteligente y los actores ganen relevancia e interés como objeto de estudio, comenzando a disputar el protagonismo en estos territorios. No hemos identificado estudios que reconozcan a estas partes interesadas en las ciudades inteligentes. El objetivo era identificarlos, así como sus atributos y su relevancia. Realizamos una revisión sistemática de la literatura y obtuvimos 82 documentos finales. Como resultado, la sociedad civil fue el actor más citado, seguida de las industrias / empresas, seguida de los gobiernos y, finalmente, de la academia / universidades. Los resultados, tanto por región geográfica de estudio como por formación académica de los autores, hacen referencia al mismo resultado. No identificamos ninguna mención de la relevancia y los atributos de las partes interesadas en las ciudades inteligentes, lo que indica una brecha científica que se estudiará en el futuro. La docencia y la investigación fue el segmento menos significativo entre los actores, lo que indica la necesidad de incluir a este grupo como protagonistas activos en este proceso. Concluimos que la sociedad civil debe involucrarse de manera efectiva en estas iniciativas de ciudades inteligentes, después de todo, estos son los principales accionistas de estas ciudades.Em 2050, 70% da população mundial viverá em cidades, pressionando as gestões a tornarem-se inteligentes e os stakeholders ganham relevância e interesse enquanto objeto de estudo, passando a disputar o protagonismo nestes territórios. Não identificamos estudos que reconheçam estes stakeholders nas cidades inteligentes. O objetivo foi identificá-los, bem como os seus atributos e a sua saliência. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática da literatura e obtivemos 82 documentos finais. Como resultado, a sociedade civil foi o stakeholder mais citado, seguido pelas indústrias/companhias, na sequência pelos governos e, por último, pela academia/universidades. Os resultados, tanto por região geográfica de estudo quanto pela formação acadêmica dos autores, remetem ao mesmo resultado. Não identificamos menção à saliência e aos atributos dos stakeholders das smart cities, indicando lacuna científica a ser futuramente estudada. Ensino e pesquisa foi o segmento menos significativo entre os stakeholders, indicando a necessidade de inserção deste grupo como protagonistas ativos neste processo. Concluimos que a sociedade civil carece de ser efetivamente envolvida nestas iniciativas de smart cities, afinal de contas, seriam estes os principais acionistas destas cidades.Research, Society and Development2021-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1193110.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e44410111931Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e44410111931Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e444101119312525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931/10807Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópolihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Jefferson Cirne daStorópoli, José2021-02-20T21:19:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11931Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:38.402388Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities Grupos de interés no contexto das smart cities Stakeholders no contexto das smart cities |
title |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
spellingShingle |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities Costa, Jefferson Cirne da Stakeholders Cidades inteligentes Hélice quádrupla Revisão sistemática. Partes intresadas Ciudades inteligentes Hélice cuádruple Revisión sistemática. Stakeholders Smart cities Quadrupal helix Systematic review. |
title_short |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
title_full |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
title_fullStr |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
title_sort |
Stakeholders in the context of smart cities |
author |
Costa, Jefferson Cirne da |
author_facet |
Costa, Jefferson Cirne da Storópoli, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Storópoli, José |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Jefferson Cirne da Storópoli, José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stakeholders Cidades inteligentes Hélice quádrupla Revisão sistemática. Partes intresadas Ciudades inteligentes Hélice cuádruple Revisión sistemática. Stakeholders Smart cities Quadrupal helix Systematic review. |
topic |
Stakeholders Cidades inteligentes Hélice quádrupla Revisão sistemática. Partes intresadas Ciudades inteligentes Hélice cuádruple Revisión sistemática. Stakeholders Smart cities Quadrupal helix Systematic review. |
description |
In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11931/10807 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópoli https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópoli https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e44410111931 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e44410111931 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e44410111931 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052668686893056 |