University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Amanda Lopes dos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Prati, Sérgio Roberto Adriano, Santos, Aline de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15442
Resumo: To analyze the university students’ lifestyle of different shifts. It was instigated 400 students of a university in Paranavaí, 287 of Business and 113 of Pedagogy. All of them answered the questionnaire Fantastic Lifestyle, composed by 25 questions, subdivided into 9 dimensions: Family and friends (F); Physical activity (PA); Nutrition (N); Tobacco and drugs (TD); Alcohol (Al); Safety, stress and sexual activity (S); Type of behavior (TC); Introspection (I) and Career (C). Each answer assigns a value from 0 to 4 points, totaling a maximum score of 100 (the higher the score, the better the lifestyle). On average, the Business students obtained 65.0 ± 10.4 pts, Pedagogy students reached 67.6 ± 10.9 pts. In the comparison between students of different shifts it was observed that there was no statistical difference (P> 0.05) among students of Pedagogy (Afternoon, n = 56, EVF = 67.8 ± 10.7 pts and Night n=57, EVF 67,4±11,2pts), whereas Business students showed some difference (P=0,01), the morning shift (68.1 ± 9.3) presented better results than the night one (64.1 ± 10.6pts). Finally, it was identified that 35% of Business students reached the minimum score (70 points) considered healthier and of lower risk, with 28 % morning students and 71% night. As for Pedagogy students, 45% obtained EVF considered adequate, being 43% of afternoon and 56% of night. College students' lifestyle is predominantly inadequate; night students’ lifestyle is worse than day students and this is most evident in male students.
id UNIFEI_e2273619785b3925a359e8c065c20d20
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15442
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shiftsEstilo de vida en estudiantes universitarios: Análisis de estudiantes em diferentes horario de estudioEstilo de vida de universitários: Análise de estudantes em diferentes turnosEstudantesEstilo de vidaComportamento de riscoSaúde.EstudiantesEstilo de VidaAsunción de riesgoSalud.StudentsLifestyleRisk-TakingHealth.To analyze the university students’ lifestyle of different shifts. It was instigated 400 students of a university in Paranavaí, 287 of Business and 113 of Pedagogy. All of them answered the questionnaire Fantastic Lifestyle, composed by 25 questions, subdivided into 9 dimensions: Family and friends (F); Physical activity (PA); Nutrition (N); Tobacco and drugs (TD); Alcohol (Al); Safety, stress and sexual activity (S); Type of behavior (TC); Introspection (I) and Career (C). Each answer assigns a value from 0 to 4 points, totaling a maximum score of 100 (the higher the score, the better the lifestyle). On average, the Business students obtained 65.0 ± 10.4 pts, Pedagogy students reached 67.6 ± 10.9 pts. In the comparison between students of different shifts it was observed that there was no statistical difference (P> 0.05) among students of Pedagogy (Afternoon, n = 56, EVF = 67.8 ± 10.7 pts and Night n=57, EVF 67,4±11,2pts), whereas Business students showed some difference (P=0,01), the morning shift (68.1 ± 9.3) presented better results than the night one (64.1 ± 10.6pts). Finally, it was identified that 35% of Business students reached the minimum score (70 points) considered healthier and of lower risk, with 28 % morning students and 71% night. As for Pedagogy students, 45% obtained EVF considered adequate, being 43% of afternoon and 56% of night. College students' lifestyle is predominantly inadequate; night students’ lifestyle is worse than day students and this is most evident in male students.Analizar el estilo de vida de estudiantes universitarios de diferentes turnos. Se investigaron 400 estudiantes de una universidad de Paranavaí-PR, 287 de Administración y 113 de Pedagogía; todos respondieron el cuestionario Fantastic Lifestyle (25 preguntas) subdivididas en 9 dimensiones: Familia y amigos (F); Actividad física (AF); Nutrición (N); Tabaco y drogas (TD); Alcohol (Al); Seguridad, estrés y actividad sexual (S); Tipo de comportamiento (TC); Introspección (I); Carrera (C). Cada respuesta asigna un valor de 0 a 4 puntos, totalizando una puntuación máxima de 100 (cuanto más alto, mejor es el estilo de vida). En promedio, los estudiantes de Administración obtuvieron 65.0 ± 10.4pts y los estudiantes de pedagogía 67.6 ± 10.9pts. Al comparar estudiantes de diferentes turnos, se observó que no hubo diferencia estadística (P> 0.05) entre los estudiantes de Pedagogía (Tarde, n = 56, EVF = 67.8 ± 10.7pts; Nocturne, n = 57, EVF = 67.4 ± 11.2pts ), por otro lado, los estudiantes de Administración mostraron una diferencia (P = 0.01), y los estudiantes del turno de la mañana (68.1 ± 9.3) mostraron un mejor EVF en relación al turno de la noche (64, 1 ± 10.6pts). Finalmente, se identificó que el 35% de los estudiantes de Administración alcanzó la puntuación mínima (70 puntos) considerada más saludable y menos riesgosa, 28% estudiando en la mañana y 71% en la noche. En cuanto a los estudiantes de Pedagogía, el 45% obtuvo EVF considerada adecuada, el 43% de los cuales por la tarde y el 56% por la noche. El estilo de vida de los estudiantes universitarios es predominantemente inadecuado; los estudiantes nocturnos tienen un estilo de vida peor en comparación con los estudiantes diurnos, esto es más evidente en los estudiantes varones.Analisar o estilo de vida de universitários de diferentes turnos. Foram investigados 400 estudantes de uma universidade de Paranavaí-PR, 287 de Administração e 113 de Pedagogia; todos responderam ao questionário Estilo de vida Fantástico (EVF), composto por 25 questões, subdividido em 9 dimensões: Família e amigos (F); Atividade física (AF); Nutrição (N); Tabaco e drogas (TD); Álcool (Al); Segurança, estresse e atividade sexual (S); Tipo de comportamento (TC); Introspecção (I) e Carreira (C). Cada resposta atribui um valor de 0 a 4 pontos, totalizando escore máximo de 100 (quanto mais alto, melhor o estilo de vida). Em média os estudantes de Administração obtiveram 65,0±10,4pts e estudantes de pedagogia 67,6±10,9pts. Na comparação entre estudantes de turnos diferentes observou-se que não houve diferença estatística (P>0,05) entre estudantes de pedagogia (Vespertino, n=56, EVF= 67,8±10,7pts e Noturno, n=57, EVF= 67,4±11,2pts), em contrapartida estudantes de administração apresentaram diferença (P=0,01), sendo que estudantes do turno matutino (68,1±9,3) apontaram melhor EVF em relação ao noturno (64,1±10,6pts). Por fim, foi identificado que 35% dos estudantes de Administração alcançaram o escore mínimo (70pontos) considerado mais saudável e de menor risco, sendo 28% do período matutino e 71% do noturno. Quanto aos estudantes de Pedagogia, 45% obtiveram EVF considerado adequado, sendo 43% do vespertino e 56% do noturno. O Estilo de vida dos universitários é predominantemente inadequado; estudantes do período noturno apresentam pior estilo de vida quando comparado com estudantes diurnos e isso é mais evidente em estudantes do sexo masculino.Research, Society and Development2021-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1544210.33448/rsd-v10i5.15442Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e54810515442Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e54810515442Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e548105154422525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15442/13701Copyright (c) 2021 Amanda Lopes dos Santos; Sérgio Roberto Adriano Prati; Aline de Souza Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Amanda Lopes dosPrati, Sérgio Roberto Adriano Santos, Aline de Souza2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15442Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:15.961874Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
Estilo de vida en estudiantes universitarios: Análisis de estudiantes em diferentes horario de estudio
Estilo de vida de universitários: Análise de estudantes em diferentes turnos
title University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
spellingShingle University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
Santos, Amanda Lopes dos
Estudantes
Estilo de vida
Comportamento de risco
Saúde.
Estudiantes
Estilo de Vida
Asunción de riesgo
Salud.
Students
Lifestyle
Risk-Taking
Health.
title_short University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
title_full University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
title_fullStr University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
title_full_unstemmed University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
title_sort University students’ lifestyle of students in diferent shifts
author Santos, Amanda Lopes dos
author_facet Santos, Amanda Lopes dos
Prati, Sérgio Roberto Adriano
Santos, Aline de Souza
author_role author
author2 Prati, Sérgio Roberto Adriano
Santos, Aline de Souza
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Amanda Lopes dos
Prati, Sérgio Roberto Adriano
Santos, Aline de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estudantes
Estilo de vida
Comportamento de risco
Saúde.
Estudiantes
Estilo de Vida
Asunción de riesgo
Salud.
Students
Lifestyle
Risk-Taking
Health.
topic Estudantes
Estilo de vida
Comportamento de risco
Saúde.
Estudiantes
Estilo de Vida
Asunción de riesgo
Salud.
Students
Lifestyle
Risk-Taking
Health.
description To analyze the university students’ lifestyle of different shifts. It was instigated 400 students of a university in Paranavaí, 287 of Business and 113 of Pedagogy. All of them answered the questionnaire Fantastic Lifestyle, composed by 25 questions, subdivided into 9 dimensions: Family and friends (F); Physical activity (PA); Nutrition (N); Tobacco and drugs (TD); Alcohol (Al); Safety, stress and sexual activity (S); Type of behavior (TC); Introspection (I) and Career (C). Each answer assigns a value from 0 to 4 points, totaling a maximum score of 100 (the higher the score, the better the lifestyle). On average, the Business students obtained 65.0 ± 10.4 pts, Pedagogy students reached 67.6 ± 10.9 pts. In the comparison between students of different shifts it was observed that there was no statistical difference (P> 0.05) among students of Pedagogy (Afternoon, n = 56, EVF = 67.8 ± 10.7 pts and Night n=57, EVF 67,4±11,2pts), whereas Business students showed some difference (P=0,01), the morning shift (68.1 ± 9.3) presented better results than the night one (64.1 ± 10.6pts). Finally, it was identified that 35% of Business students reached the minimum score (70 points) considered healthier and of lower risk, with 28 % morning students and 71% night. As for Pedagogy students, 45% obtained EVF considered adequate, being 43% of afternoon and 56% of night. College students' lifestyle is predominantly inadequate; night students’ lifestyle is worse than day students and this is most evident in male students.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15442
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15442
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15442
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15442
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15442/13701
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Amanda Lopes dos Santos; Sérgio Roberto Adriano Prati; Aline de Souza Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Amanda Lopes dos Santos; Sérgio Roberto Adriano Prati; Aline de Souza Santos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e54810515442
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e54810515442
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e54810515442
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052677571477504

Registros relacionados