Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perez, Mirko Dennys Ayala
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Renato Pichini de, Maeda, Fernando, Miranda-Jr, Walter Gomes, Pimentel, Angelica Castro, Boaro, Leticia Cristina Cidreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11337
Resumo: In order to improve the adhesion between cement and zirconia, aluminum oxide sandblasting (JAT) and Rocatec, sandblasting with silica coated aluminum oxide (ROC), also the primer Signum Zirconia Bond (SZB) were used. The objective of the study was to verify the influence of the surface treatment and the presence of SZB primer in relation to the bond strength between cement and zirconia, using 60 zirconia specimens measuring 7 mm in length, 7 mm in width and 3 mm in length. thickness. Three surface treatments were evaluated: sandblasting with pre-sintering aluminum oxide (OPre), Rocatec Soft before (RPre) and zirconia final sintering (RPos), and also, regarding the presence or not of SZB. All specimens were cemented with Panavia F. The bond strength (RU) was evaluated through a shear test with a standardization device from SDI (Southern Dental Industrie) on a universal testing machine (Kratos), with a speed of 0 , 5 mm / min. The data were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis / Mann-Whitney (α = 0.05). Average (SD) of UK without the use of SZB: OPre: 5.5 (0.9) Ba; RPre: 4.0 (1.4) Bb; RPos: 5.0 (0.5) Bab. Average (SD) of UK using SZB: OPre: 7.9 (1.5) Aab; RPre: 6.7 (2.3) Ab; RPos: 9.0 (1.2) Aa. The use of primer increased the cement / zirconia bond strength regardless of the surface treatment performed, in addition, the Rocatec group after sintering with primer, obtained higher bond strength values ​​compared to the other study groups.
id UNIFEI_e23cf81954e8672a583014a797777e75
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11337
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interfaceEficacia del tratamiento y de la utilización de un primer a base de MDP en la resistencia de unión en la interfaz circonio-cementoEficiência do tratamento e da utilização de um primer a base de MDP na resistência de união da interface zircônia-cimentoAdesivos dentináriosCerâmicaZircônio.Adhesivos dentinariosCerámicaZirconio.Dentin BondingCeramicsZirconium.In order to improve the adhesion between cement and zirconia, aluminum oxide sandblasting (JAT) and Rocatec, sandblasting with silica coated aluminum oxide (ROC), also the primer Signum Zirconia Bond (SZB) were used. The objective of the study was to verify the influence of the surface treatment and the presence of SZB primer in relation to the bond strength between cement and zirconia, using 60 zirconia specimens measuring 7 mm in length, 7 mm in width and 3 mm in length. thickness. Three surface treatments were evaluated: sandblasting with pre-sintering aluminum oxide (OPre), Rocatec Soft before (RPre) and zirconia final sintering (RPos), and also, regarding the presence or not of SZB. All specimens were cemented with Panavia F. The bond strength (RU) was evaluated through a shear test with a standardization device from SDI (Southern Dental Industrie) on a universal testing machine (Kratos), with a speed of 0 , 5 mm / min. The data were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis / Mann-Whitney (α = 0.05). Average (SD) of UK without the use of SZB: OPre: 5.5 (0.9) Ba; RPre: 4.0 (1.4) Bb; RPos: 5.0 (0.5) Bab. Average (SD) of UK using SZB: OPre: 7.9 (1.5) Aab; RPre: 6.7 (2.3) Ab; RPos: 9.0 (1.2) Aa. The use of primer increased the cement / zirconia bond strength regardless of the surface treatment performed, in addition, the Rocatec group after sintering with primer, obtained higher bond strength values ​​compared to the other study groups.Para mejorar la adhesión entre el cemento y el zirconio, fue utilizado el chorro con oxido de aluminio (JAT) y el Rocatec, chorro con oxido de aluminio revestido por sílica (ROC).también el primer Signum Zirconia Bond (SZB). El objetivo de este estudio fue verificar la influencia del tratamiento de superficie y de la presencia del primer SZB en relación a la resistencia de unión entre el cemento y el zirconio, utilizando  60 cuerpos de prueba en zirconio midiendo 7mm de altura,7mm de ancho y 3 mm de espesor. Fueron evaluados tres tratamientos de superficie : chorro con oxido de aluminio pre-sinterizado (OPre),Rocatec Soft antes (RPre)y después de la sinterización final del zirconio (RPos) y también cuando hay presencia o no del SZB. Todos los cuerpos de prueba fueron cementados con Panavia F. La resistencia de unión (RU) fue evaluada por el teste de cizallamiento con el dispositivo de padronización de la SDI (Southern Dental Industrie) en una maquina de ensayo universal (Kratos), a una velocidad de 0,5 mm/min. Los datos fueron evaluados utilizando Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney (α=0,05). Medias (DP) de RU sin utilización del SZB: OPre: 5,5 (0,9) Ba; RPre: 4,0 (1,4) Bb; RPos: 5,0 (0,5) Bab. Medias (DP) de RU con la utilización de SZB: OPre: 7,9 (1,5) Aab; RPre: 6,7 (2,3) Ab; RPos:9,0 (1,2) Aa. El uso del primer aumento la resistencia de unión cemento/zirconio independientemente del tratamiento de superficie realizado, además, el grupo tratado con Rocatec pos-sinterización con  primer obtuvo mayores valores de resistencia de unión comparados a los demás grupos de estudio.Para melhorar a adesão entre cimento e zircônia, foram utilizados jateamento com óxido de alumínio (JAT) e o Rocatec, jateamento com óxido de alumínio revestido por sílica (ROC), também o  primer Signum Zircônia Bond (SZB). O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a influência do tratamento de superfície e da presença de primer SZB em relação a resistência de união entre cimento e zircônia, utilizando 60 corpos de prova de zircônia medindo 7 mm de comprimento, 7 mm de largura e 3 mm de espessura. Foram avaliados três tratamentos de superfície: jateamento com óxido de alumínio pré-sinterização (OPre), Rocatec Soft antes (RPre) e após-sinterização final da zircônia (RPos), e também, quanto a presença ou não de SZB. Todos os corpos de prova foram cimentados com Panavia F. A resitência de união (RU) foi avaliada através de teste de cisalhamento com dispositivo de padronização da SDI (Southern Dental Industrie) em uma máquina de ensaios universal (Kratos), com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os dados foram avaliados utilizando Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney (α=0,05). Médias (DP) de RU sem a utilização de SZB: OPre: 5,5 (0,9) Ba; RPre: 4,0 (1,4) Bb; RPos: 5,0 (0,5) Bab. Médias (DP) de RU com a utilização de SZB: OPre: 7,9 (1,5) Aab; RPre: 6,7 (2,3) Ab; RPos:9,0 (1,2) Aa. A utilização do primer aumentou a resistência de união cimento/zircônia independentemente do tratamento de superfície realizado, além disso, o grupo Rocatec pós-sinterização com primer, obteve maiores valores de resistência de união comparados aos demais grupos do estudo.Research, Society and Development2021-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1133710.33448/rsd-v10i5.11337Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e20910511337Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e20910511337Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e209105113372525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11337/13388Copyright (c) 2021 Mirko Dennys Ayala Perez; Renato Pichini de Oliveira; Fernando Maeda; Walter Gomes Miranda-Jr; Angelica Castro Pimentel; Leticia Cristina Cidreira Boarohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerez, Mirko Dennys Ayala Oliveira, Renato Pichini de Maeda, FernandoMiranda-Jr, Walter Gomes Pimentel, Angelica Castro Boaro, Leticia Cristina Cidreira 2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11337Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:11.564338Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
Eficacia del tratamiento y de la utilización de un primer a base de MDP en la resistencia de unión en la interfaz circonio-cemento
Eficiência do tratamento e da utilização de um primer a base de MDP na resistência de união da interface zircônia-cimento
title Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
spellingShingle Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
Perez, Mirko Dennys Ayala
Adesivos dentinários
Cerâmica
Zircônio.
Adhesivos dentinarios
Cerámica
Zirconio.
Dentin Bonding
Ceramics
Zirconium.
title_short Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
title_full Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
title_fullStr Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
title_sort Efficiency of treatment and use of a MDP-primer on the bond strentgh of zirconia-cement interface
author Perez, Mirko Dennys Ayala
author_facet Perez, Mirko Dennys Ayala
Oliveira, Renato Pichini de
Maeda, Fernando
Miranda-Jr, Walter Gomes
Pimentel, Angelica Castro
Boaro, Leticia Cristina Cidreira
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Renato Pichini de
Maeda, Fernando
Miranda-Jr, Walter Gomes
Pimentel, Angelica Castro
Boaro, Leticia Cristina Cidreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perez, Mirko Dennys Ayala
Oliveira, Renato Pichini de
Maeda, Fernando
Miranda-Jr, Walter Gomes
Pimentel, Angelica Castro
Boaro, Leticia Cristina Cidreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adesivos dentinários
Cerâmica
Zircônio.
Adhesivos dentinarios
Cerámica
Zirconio.
Dentin Bonding
Ceramics
Zirconium.
topic Adesivos dentinários
Cerâmica
Zircônio.
Adhesivos dentinarios
Cerámica
Zirconio.
Dentin Bonding
Ceramics
Zirconium.
description In order to improve the adhesion between cement and zirconia, aluminum oxide sandblasting (JAT) and Rocatec, sandblasting with silica coated aluminum oxide (ROC), also the primer Signum Zirconia Bond (SZB) were used. The objective of the study was to verify the influence of the surface treatment and the presence of SZB primer in relation to the bond strength between cement and zirconia, using 60 zirconia specimens measuring 7 mm in length, 7 mm in width and 3 mm in length. thickness. Three surface treatments were evaluated: sandblasting with pre-sintering aluminum oxide (OPre), Rocatec Soft before (RPre) and zirconia final sintering (RPos), and also, regarding the presence or not of SZB. All specimens were cemented with Panavia F. The bond strength (RU) was evaluated through a shear test with a standardization device from SDI (Southern Dental Industrie) on a universal testing machine (Kratos), with a speed of 0 , 5 mm / min. The data were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis / Mann-Whitney (α = 0.05). Average (SD) of UK without the use of SZB: OPre: 5.5 (0.9) Ba; RPre: 4.0 (1.4) Bb; RPos: 5.0 (0.5) Bab. Average (SD) of UK using SZB: OPre: 7.9 (1.5) Aab; RPre: 6.7 (2.3) Ab; RPos: 9.0 (1.2) Aa. The use of primer increased the cement / zirconia bond strength regardless of the surface treatment performed, in addition, the Rocatec group after sintering with primer, obtained higher bond strength values ​​compared to the other study groups.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11337
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.11337
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11337
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.11337
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11337/13388
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e20910511337
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e20910511337
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e20910511337
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052667257683968