Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16995 |
Resumo: | Conyza spp. it is a difficult species to control, especially in more advanced phenological stages requiring specific chemical control strategies. The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of Conyza spp. through an application of 2,4-D herbicide + glyphosate, followed or not, by sequential applications of desiccant herbicides in isolation and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides in pre-planting of soybean crop. The experiment was carried out in the field in an area with natural infestation of Conyza spp. in a randomized block experimental design with 4 replications and 18 treatments. An application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (975 + 1025 g a.i. ha-1) was performed and 15 days after the initial application (DAI) sequential applications were performed: diquat (400 g a.i. ha-1); carfentrazone (30 g a.i. ha-1); glufosinate ammonium (500 g a.i. ha-1); saflufenacil (49 g a.i. ha-1) individually and associated with flumioxazim + imazethapyr (50 + 100 g a.i. ha-1); sulfentrazone + diuron (245 + 490 g a.i. ha-1) and diclosulam (29.4 g a.i. ha-1) and the control without herbicide application. A single 2,4-D + glyphosate application was not effective in the control. Applications that relied on carfentrazone were ineffective in controlling. Diquat, saflufenacil and ammonium glufosinate, associated with pre-emergent herbicides (diclosulam, sulfentrazone + diuron and flumioxazim + imazethapyr), resulted in a control greater than 80%. Carfentrazone is not an alternative for the control of Conyza spp., diquat, glufosinate ammonium and saflufenacil isolated and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides are viable in the control of Conyza spp. |
id |
UNIFEI_e28f97aecb86c34bfc6d105d4205808d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16995 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications?Estrategias de control para Conyza spp. en pre-siembra de soja: Aplicaciones únicas o secuenciales?Estratégias de controle de Conyza spp. em pré-plantio da soja: Aplicações únicas ou sequenciais?ResidualControl químicoManejo integrado de malezas.ResidualChemical controlIntegrated management.ResidualControle químicoManejo integrado.Conyza spp. it is a difficult species to control, especially in more advanced phenological stages requiring specific chemical control strategies. The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of Conyza spp. through an application of 2,4-D herbicide + glyphosate, followed or not, by sequential applications of desiccant herbicides in isolation and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides in pre-planting of soybean crop. The experiment was carried out in the field in an area with natural infestation of Conyza spp. in a randomized block experimental design with 4 replications and 18 treatments. An application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (975 + 1025 g a.i. ha-1) was performed and 15 days after the initial application (DAI) sequential applications were performed: diquat (400 g a.i. ha-1); carfentrazone (30 g a.i. ha-1); glufosinate ammonium (500 g a.i. ha-1); saflufenacil (49 g a.i. ha-1) individually and associated with flumioxazim + imazethapyr (50 + 100 g a.i. ha-1); sulfentrazone + diuron (245 + 490 g a.i. ha-1) and diclosulam (29.4 g a.i. ha-1) and the control without herbicide application. A single 2,4-D + glyphosate application was not effective in the control. Applications that relied on carfentrazone were ineffective in controlling. Diquat, saflufenacil and ammonium glufosinate, associated with pre-emergent herbicides (diclosulam, sulfentrazone + diuron and flumioxazim + imazethapyr), resulted in a control greater than 80%. Carfentrazone is not an alternative for the control of Conyza spp., diquat, glufosinate ammonium and saflufenacil isolated and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides are viable in the control of Conyza spp.Conyza spp. es una especie de difícil control, especialmente en etapas fenológicas más avanzadas que requieren estrategias específicas de control químico. El objetivo del presente trabajo es evaluar el control de Conyza spp. con una aplicación de 2,4-D + glifosato, seguida o no, de aplicaciones secuenciales de herbicidas desecantes de forma aislada y / o asociados con herbicidas pre-emergentes en la pre-siembra del cultivo de soja. El experimento se realizó en campo en una área con infestación natural de Conyza spp en un diseño experimental de bloques completos al azar, con 4 repeticiones y 18 tratamientos. Se realizó aplicación de 2,4-D + glifosato (975 + 1025 g i.a. ha-1) y 15 días después de la aplicación inicial (DAI) se realizaron aplicaciones secuenciales: diquat (400 g i.a. ha-1); carfentrazona (30 g a.i. ha-1); glufosinato de amonio (500 g a.i. ha-1); saflufenacil (49 g i.a. ha-1) solos y asociados a flumioxazina + imazetapir (50 + 100 g i.a. ha-1); sulfentrazona + diuron (245 + 490 g i.a. ha-1) y diclosulam (29,4 g i.a. ha-1) y un testigo sin aplicación. Una sola aplicación de 2,4-D + glifosato no fue eficaz. Las aplicaciones que dependían de carfentrazona fueron ineficaces. Sin embargo, diquat, saflufenacil y glufosinato de amonio, asociados con herbicidas preemergentes (diclosulam, sulfentrazona + diuron y flumioxazim + imazethapyr), resultaron en un control superior al 80%. Carfentrazona no es una alternativa para el control de Conyza spp., mientras diquat, glufosinato de amonio y saflufenacil aislados y / o asociados a herbicidas preemergentes son viables para control de Conyza spp.A Conyza spp. é uma espécie de difícil controle, principalmente em estágios fenológicos mais avançados demandando estratégias específicas de controle químico. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar o controle de Conyza spp. através de uma aplicação do herbicida 2,4-D + glifosato, seguidas ou não, de aplicações sequenciais de herbicidas dessecantes de forma isolada e/ou associados a herbicidas pré-emergentes em pré-plantio da cultura da soja. O experimento foi realizado a campo em uma área com infestação natural de Conyza spp em delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso com 4 repetições e 18 tratamentos. Foi efetuada uma aplicação de 2,4-D + glifosato (975 + 1025 g i.a. ha-1) e após 15 dias da aplicação inicial (DAI) foram realizadas as aplicações sequenciais: diquat (400 g i.a. ha-1); carfentrazone (30 g i.a. ha-1); glufosinato de amônio (500 g i.a. ha-1); saflufenacil (49 g i.a. ha-1) individualmente e associados com flumioxazina + imazetapir (50 + 100 g i.a. ha-1); sulfentrazone + diuron (245 + 490 g i.a. ha-1) e diclosulam (29,4 g i.a. ha-1) e a testemunha sem aplicação de herbicida. Uma única aplicação 2,4-D + glifosato não foi efetiva no controle. As aplicações que contaram com carfentrazone foram ineficazes no controle. Diquat, saflufenacil e glufosinato de amônio, associados com herbicidas pré-emergentes (diclosulam, sulfentrazone + diuron e flumioxazim + imazethapyr), resultaram em controle superiores a 80%. Carfentrazone não é uma alternativa para o controle de Conyza spp., diquat, amônio glufosinato e saflufenacil isolados e/ou associados com herbicidas pré-emergentes são viáveis no controle de Conyza spp.Research, Society and Development2021-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1699510.33448/rsd-v10i8.16995Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e10310816995Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e10310816995Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e103108169952525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16995/15282Copyright (c) 2021 Paulo Vinicius da Silva; Pedro Henrique de Souza Menezes da Costa; Matheus Vieira Barbosa de Oliveira; Daniela Maria Barros; Daniel Zamignan Molina; Roque Dias de Carvalho; Patrícia Andrea Monquero; Estela Maris Ináciohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Paulo Vinicius da Costa, Pedro Henrique de Souza Menezes da Oliveira, Matheus Vieira Barbosa de Barros, Daniela Maria Molina, Daniel Zamignan Carvalho, Roque Dias de Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Inácio, Estela Maris 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16995Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:24.248033Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? Estrategias de control para Conyza spp. en pre-siembra de soja: Aplicaciones únicas o secuenciales? Estratégias de controle de Conyza spp. em pré-plantio da soja: Aplicações únicas ou sequenciais? |
title |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
spellingShingle |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Residual Control químico Manejo integrado de malezas. Residual Chemical control Integrated management. Residual Controle químico Manejo integrado. |
title_short |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
title_full |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
title_fullStr |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
title_sort |
Control strategies for Conyza spp. in soybean pre-planting: Single or sequential applications? |
author |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da |
author_facet |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Costa, Pedro Henrique de Souza Menezes da Oliveira, Matheus Vieira Barbosa de Barros, Daniela Maria Molina, Daniel Zamignan Carvalho, Roque Dias de Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Inácio, Estela Maris |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Pedro Henrique de Souza Menezes da Oliveira, Matheus Vieira Barbosa de Barros, Daniela Maria Molina, Daniel Zamignan Carvalho, Roque Dias de Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Inácio, Estela Maris |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Costa, Pedro Henrique de Souza Menezes da Oliveira, Matheus Vieira Barbosa de Barros, Daniela Maria Molina, Daniel Zamignan Carvalho, Roque Dias de Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Inácio, Estela Maris |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Residual Control químico Manejo integrado de malezas. Residual Chemical control Integrated management. Residual Controle químico Manejo integrado. |
topic |
Residual Control químico Manejo integrado de malezas. Residual Chemical control Integrated management. Residual Controle químico Manejo integrado. |
description |
Conyza spp. it is a difficult species to control, especially in more advanced phenological stages requiring specific chemical control strategies. The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of Conyza spp. through an application of 2,4-D herbicide + glyphosate, followed or not, by sequential applications of desiccant herbicides in isolation and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides in pre-planting of soybean crop. The experiment was carried out in the field in an area with natural infestation of Conyza spp. in a randomized block experimental design with 4 replications and 18 treatments. An application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (975 + 1025 g a.i. ha-1) was performed and 15 days after the initial application (DAI) sequential applications were performed: diquat (400 g a.i. ha-1); carfentrazone (30 g a.i. ha-1); glufosinate ammonium (500 g a.i. ha-1); saflufenacil (49 g a.i. ha-1) individually and associated with flumioxazim + imazethapyr (50 + 100 g a.i. ha-1); sulfentrazone + diuron (245 + 490 g a.i. ha-1) and diclosulam (29.4 g a.i. ha-1) and the control without herbicide application. A single 2,4-D + glyphosate application was not effective in the control. Applications that relied on carfentrazone were ineffective in controlling. Diquat, saflufenacil and ammonium glufosinate, associated with pre-emergent herbicides (diclosulam, sulfentrazone + diuron and flumioxazim + imazethapyr), resulted in a control greater than 80%. Carfentrazone is not an alternative for the control of Conyza spp., diquat, glufosinate ammonium and saflufenacil isolated and/or associated with pre-emergent herbicides are viable in the control of Conyza spp. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16995 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16995 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16995 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16995 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16995/15282 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e10310816995 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e10310816995 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e10310816995 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052751404859392 |