Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17862 |
Resumo: | This article carries out an analysis of the implementation of the models Information Technology and Communication (ICT) Governance in the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary in the light of Institutional Theory and good practices internationally recognized such as the COBIT framework and regulations published by the Federal Court of Auditors (FCA) and the National Council of Justice (NCJ). For this, it was performed a comparative analysis of the results of the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD, published by CNJ in 2016 and 2017. It was sought to identify whether the Courts, specifically those of the State Justice, had their models of ICT Governance implemented and/or were improved in this period. It was observed that the implementation of ICT Governance models figures a recent thematic in these institutions and, although mechanisms of coercive isomorphism have been employed, its effective institutionalization within these Courts is still slow and emblematic, with markedly weakened advances regarding the effectiveness of its controls. |
id |
UNIFEI_e6702465418fe4b0fc5f0639e7394cbf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17862 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD La Gobernanza de Tecnología de la Información en el Poder Judicial: Un análisis a partir del cuestionario iGovTIC-JUD A Governança de Tecnologia da Informação no Poder Judiciário: Uma análise a partir do questionário iGovTIC-JUD Gobernanza de TICPoder JudicialTeoría institucional.Governança de TICPoder JudiciárioTeoria institucional.ICT GovernanceJudiciaryInstitutional theory.This article carries out an analysis of the implementation of the models Information Technology and Communication (ICT) Governance in the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary in the light of Institutional Theory and good practices internationally recognized such as the COBIT framework and regulations published by the Federal Court of Auditors (FCA) and the National Council of Justice (NCJ). For this, it was performed a comparative analysis of the results of the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD, published by CNJ in 2016 and 2017. It was sought to identify whether the Courts, specifically those of the State Justice, had their models of ICT Governance implemented and/or were improved in this period. It was observed that the implementation of ICT Governance models figures a recent thematic in these institutions and, although mechanisms of coercive isomorphism have been employed, its effective institutionalization within these Courts is still slow and emblematic, with markedly weakened advances regarding the effectiveness of its controls.El presente artículo realiza un análisis de la implementación de modelos de Gobernanza de Tecnología de la Información y Comunicación (TIC) en el ámbito del Poder Judicial brasileño a la luz de la Teoría Institucional y de las buenas prácticas propaladas internacionalmente, a ejemplo del framework COBIT y reglamentos publicados por el Tribunal de Cuentas de la Unión (TCU) y el Consejo Nacional de Justicia (CNJ). Para eso, se realizó un análisis comparativo de los resultados del cuestionario iGovTIC-JUD, publicado por el CNJ, en los años 2016 y 2017. Se buscó identificar si los Tribunales, específicamente los de la Justicia Estatal han tenido sus modelos de Gobernanza de TIC implementados y / o mejorados en ese período. Se observó que la implementación de modelos de Gobernanza de TIC figura temática reciente en estos órganos y, aunque se han empleado mecanismos del isomorfismo coercitivo, su efectiva institucionalización en el interior de esos Tribunales todavía se muestra lenta y emblemática, con avances notadamente fragilizados en cuanto a la efectividad de sus controles.O presente artigo realiza uma análise da implementação de modelos de Governança de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação (TIC) no âmbito do Poder Judiciário brasileiro à luz da Teoria Institucional e das boas práticas propaladas internacionalmente, à exemplo do framework COBIT e regulamentos publicados pelo Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU) e Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Para isso, realizou uma análise comparativa dos resultados do questionário iGovTIC-JUD, publicado pelo CNJ, nos anos de 2016 e 2017. Buscou-se identificar se os Tribunais da Justiça Estadual tiveram seus modelos de Governança de TIC implementados e/ou melhorados nesse período. Observou-se que a implementação de modelos de Governança de TIC figura temática recente nestes órgãos e, ainda que mecanismos do isomorfismo coercitivo tenham sido empregados, sua efetiva implantação no interior desses Tribunais ainda se mostrou lenta e emblemática, com avanços notadamente fragilizados no tocante à efetividade de seus controles.Research, Society and Development2021-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1786210.33448/rsd-v10i9.17862Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e23610917862Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e23610917862Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e236109178622525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17862/16139Copyright (c) 2021 Adriano Pereira de Castro Pachecohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPacheco, Adriano Pereira de Castro2021-09-12T14:28:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17862Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:07.704185Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD La Gobernanza de Tecnología de la Información en el Poder Judicial: Un análisis a partir del cuestionario iGovTIC-JUD A Governança de Tecnologia da Informação no Poder Judiciário: Uma análise a partir do questionário iGovTIC-JUD |
title |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
spellingShingle |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD Pacheco, Adriano Pereira de Castro Gobernanza de TIC Poder Judicial Teoría institucional. Governança de TIC Poder Judiciário Teoria institucional. ICT Governance Judiciary Institutional theory. |
title_short |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
title_full |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
title_fullStr |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
title_sort |
Governance of Information Technology in the Judiciary: An analysis based on the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD |
author |
Pacheco, Adriano Pereira de Castro |
author_facet |
Pacheco, Adriano Pereira de Castro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pacheco, Adriano Pereira de Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gobernanza de TIC Poder Judicial Teoría institucional. Governança de TIC Poder Judiciário Teoria institucional. ICT Governance Judiciary Institutional theory. |
topic |
Gobernanza de TIC Poder Judicial Teoría institucional. Governança de TIC Poder Judiciário Teoria institucional. ICT Governance Judiciary Institutional theory. |
description |
This article carries out an analysis of the implementation of the models Information Technology and Communication (ICT) Governance in the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary in the light of Institutional Theory and good practices internationally recognized such as the COBIT framework and regulations published by the Federal Court of Auditors (FCA) and the National Council of Justice (NCJ). For this, it was performed a comparative analysis of the results of the questionnaire iGovTIC-JUD, published by CNJ in 2016 and 2017. It was sought to identify whether the Courts, specifically those of the State Justice, had their models of ICT Governance implemented and/or were improved in this period. It was observed that the implementation of ICT Governance models figures a recent thematic in these institutions and, although mechanisms of coercive isomorphism have been employed, its effective institutionalization within these Courts is still slow and emblematic, with markedly weakened advances regarding the effectiveness of its controls. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17862 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17862 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17862 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17862 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17862/16139 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Adriano Pereira de Castro Pacheco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Adriano Pereira de Castro Pacheco https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e23610917862 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e23610917862 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e23610917862 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052787485310976 |