Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639 |
Resumo: | This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy. |
id |
UNIFEI_e8d72149f02290a6090c167d3b82032d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5639 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case studyProtocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión en la piscicultura del estado de Pará: un estudio de casoProtocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo na piscicultura no estado do Pará: um estudo de casoAquiculturaBoas práticasCriação de peixesProdutividadeSobrevivência.AcuiculturaBuenas practicasPisciculturaProductividadSupervivencia.AquacultureGood practicesFish farmingProductivitySurvival.This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo proponer un protocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión (BPG) en la piscicultura. Con este fin, se creó un protocolo inicial mediante encuestas bibliográficas, observaciones de campo y entrevistas con piscicultores acerca del manejo de 32 granjas comerciales de peces en el estado de Pará, para determinar los puntos sujetos a intervenciones de baja complejidad y bajo costo. Posteriormente, se definieron 21 procedimientos para componer el protocolo con los siguientes pasos: transporte, asentamiento, biometría, gestión de alimentos, calidad del agua y pesca. Para su uso, cada proyecto debe tener sus procedimientos calificados en 0 (cero), cuando no cumple con el estándar establecido, o 1 (uno), cuando lo hace. La suma de los promedios de las respuestas en cada etapa indica el grado de adecuación del proyecto en: poco adecuado (0 a 2), potencialmente adecuado (2.1 a 4) o adecuado (4.1 a 6). Se espera que el protocolo sugerido ayude a los acuicultores a adoptar buenas prácticas de gestión, contribuyendo a mejorar la adecuación de sus proyectos.Este estudo objetivou propor um protocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo (BPM) na piscicultura. Para tanto, criou-se um protocolo inicial por meio de levantamento bibliográfico, observações em campo e entrevistas com piscicultores acerca do manejo em 32 pisciculturas comerciais no estado do Pará, para determinar os pontos passíveis de intervenções de baixa complexidade e custo reduzido. Posteriormente, foram definidos 21 procedimentos para compor o protocolo com as seguintes etapas: transporte, povoamento, biometria, manejo alimentar, qualidade da água e despesca. Para utilização, cada empreendimento deve ter seus procedimentos pontuados em 0 (zero), quando não cumpre o padrão estabelecido, ou 1 (um), quando cumpre. A soma das médias das respostas em cada etapa indica o grau de adequação do empreendimento em: pouco adequada (0 a 2), potencialmente adequada (2,1 a 4) ou adequada (4,1 a 6). Espera-se que o protocolo sugerido auxilie piscicultores na adoção de boas práticas de manejo, contribuindo para melhorar a adequação de seus empreendimentos.Research, Society and Development2020-07-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/563910.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e512985639Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e512985639Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e5129856392525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639/5104Copyright (c) 2020 Kaio Barros, Thayson Reis, Renato Rodrigues, Daniel Campelo, Galileu Veras, Marcos Brabohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Kaio Diego das NevesReis, Thayson da SilvaRodrigues, Renato PinheiroCampelo, Daniel Abreu VasconcelosVeras, Galileu CrovattoBrabo, Marcos Ferreira2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5639Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:05.798166Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study Protocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión en la piscicultura del estado de Pará: un estudio de caso Protocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo na piscicultura no estado do Pará: um estudo de caso |
title |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves Aquicultura Boas práticas Criação de peixes Produtividade Sobrevivência. Acuicultura Buenas practicas Piscicultura Productividad Supervivencia. Aquaculture Good practices Fish farming Productivity Survival. |
title_short |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
title_full |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
title_sort |
Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study |
author |
Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves |
author_facet |
Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves Reis, Thayson da Silva Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos Veras, Galileu Crovatto Brabo, Marcos Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, Thayson da Silva Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos Veras, Galileu Crovatto Brabo, Marcos Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves Reis, Thayson da Silva Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos Veras, Galileu Crovatto Brabo, Marcos Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aquicultura Boas práticas Criação de peixes Produtividade Sobrevivência. Acuicultura Buenas practicas Piscicultura Productividad Supervivencia. Aquaculture Good practices Fish farming Productivity Survival. |
topic |
Aquicultura Boas práticas Criação de peixes Produtividade Sobrevivência. Acuicultura Buenas practicas Piscicultura Productividad Supervivencia. Aquaculture Good practices Fish farming Productivity Survival. |
description |
This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639/5104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e512985639 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e512985639 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e512985639 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052737629716480 |