Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Reis, Thayson da Silva, Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro, Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos, Veras, Galileu Crovatto, Brabo, Marcos Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639
Resumo: This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy.
id UNIFEI_e8d72149f02290a6090c167d3b82032d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5639
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case studyProtocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión en la piscicultura del estado de Pará: un estudio de casoProtocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo na piscicultura no estado do Pará: um estudo de casoAquiculturaBoas práticasCriação de peixesProdutividadeSobrevivência.AcuiculturaBuenas practicasPisciculturaProductividadSupervivencia.AquacultureGood practicesFish farmingProductivitySurvival.This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo proponer un protocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión (BPG) en la piscicultura. Con este fin, se creó un protocolo inicial mediante encuestas bibliográficas, observaciones de campo y entrevistas con piscicultores acerca del manejo de 32 granjas comerciales de peces en el estado de Pará, para determinar los puntos sujetos a intervenciones de baja complejidad y bajo costo. Posteriormente, se definieron 21 procedimientos para componer el protocolo con los siguientes pasos: transporte, asentamiento, biometría, gestión de alimentos, calidad del agua y pesca. Para su uso, cada proyecto debe tener sus procedimientos calificados en 0 (cero), cuando no cumple con el estándar establecido, o 1 (uno), cuando lo hace. La suma de los promedios de las respuestas en cada etapa indica el grado de adecuación del proyecto en: poco adecuado (0 a 2), potencialmente adecuado (2.1 a 4) o adecuado (4.1 a 6). Se espera que el protocolo sugerido ayude a los acuicultores a adoptar buenas prácticas de gestión, contribuyendo a mejorar la adecuación de sus proyectos.Este estudo objetivou propor um protocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo (BPM) na piscicultura. Para tanto, criou-se um protocolo inicial por meio de levantamento bibliográfico, observações em campo e entrevistas com piscicultores acerca do manejo em 32 pisciculturas comerciais no estado do Pará, para determinar os pontos passíveis de intervenções de baixa complexidade e custo reduzido. Posteriormente, foram definidos 21 procedimentos para compor o protocolo com as seguintes etapas: transporte, povoamento, biometria, manejo alimentar, qualidade da água e despesca. Para utilização, cada empreendimento deve ter seus procedimentos pontuados em 0 (zero), quando não cumpre o padrão estabelecido, ou 1 (um), quando cumpre. A soma das médias das respostas em cada etapa indica o grau de adequação do empreendimento em: pouco adequada (0 a 2), potencialmente adequada (2,1 a 4) ou adequada (4,1 a 6). Espera-se que o protocolo sugerido auxilie piscicultores na adoção de boas práticas de manejo, contribuindo para melhorar a adequação de seus empreendimentos.Research, Society and Development2020-07-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/563910.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e512985639Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e512985639Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e5129856392525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639/5104Copyright (c) 2020 Kaio Barros, Thayson Reis, Renato Rodrigues, Daniel Campelo, Galileu Veras, Marcos Brabohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Kaio Diego das NevesReis, Thayson da SilvaRodrigues, Renato PinheiroCampelo, Daniel Abreu VasconcelosVeras, Galileu CrovattoBrabo, Marcos Ferreira2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5639Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:05.798166Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
Protocolo para evaluación de buenas prácticas de gestión en la piscicultura del estado de Pará: un estudio de caso
Protocolo para avaliação de boas práticas de manejo na piscicultura no estado do Pará: um estudo de caso
title Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
spellingShingle Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves
Aquicultura
Boas práticas
Criação de peixes
Produtividade
Sobrevivência.
Acuicultura
Buenas practicas
Piscicultura
Productividad
Supervivencia.
Aquaculture
Good practices
Fish farming
Productivity
Survival.
title_short Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
title_full Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
title_fullStr Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
title_sort Evaluation protocol of fish farming good management practices in the state of Pará: case study
author Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves
author_facet Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves
Reis, Thayson da Silva
Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro
Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos
Veras, Galileu Crovatto
Brabo, Marcos Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Reis, Thayson da Silva
Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro
Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos
Veras, Galileu Crovatto
Brabo, Marcos Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, Kaio Diego das Neves
Reis, Thayson da Silva
Rodrigues, Renato Pinheiro
Campelo, Daniel Abreu Vasconcelos
Veras, Galileu Crovatto
Brabo, Marcos Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aquicultura
Boas práticas
Criação de peixes
Produtividade
Sobrevivência.
Acuicultura
Buenas practicas
Piscicultura
Productividad
Supervivencia.
Aquaculture
Good practices
Fish farming
Productivity
Survival.
topic Aquicultura
Boas práticas
Criação de peixes
Produtividade
Sobrevivência.
Acuicultura
Buenas practicas
Piscicultura
Productividad
Supervivencia.
Aquaculture
Good practices
Fish farming
Productivity
Survival.
description This paper aimed to propose a protocol for good management practices (GMP) evaluation in fish farming. For such purpose, an initial protocol was created through bibliographic survey, field observations and interviews with fish farmers about management of 32 commercial fish farms in the state of Pará, to determine the susceptible points to interventions to low complexity and low-cost. Subsequently, 21 procedures were defined to compose the protocol with following steps: transport, settlement, biometrics, food management, water quality and harvest. For use, each project must have its procedures scored at 0 (zero), when it does not meet the established standard, or 1 (one), when it does. The sum of averages responses in each stage indicates the project adequacy degree in: little adequate (0 to 2), potentially adequate (2.1 to 4) or adequate (4.1 to 6). The suggested protocol is expected to assist fish farmers in adopting good management practices, contributing to improve their project adequacy.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5639
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5639/5104
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e512985639
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e512985639
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e512985639
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052737629716480