Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Menegazzo, Renato Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rickli, Max Emerson, Scanavacca, Juliana, Lima, Julliane Destro de, Silveira, Ana Cristina da, Menegazzo, André Werlang, Souza, Silvia Graciele Hülse de, Lopes, Ana Daniela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11452
Resumo: Tradescantia pallida is an ornamental plant widely found in flowerbeds and urban gardens. However, information about the physiological and biochemical responses of this ornamental plant to herbicides is scarce. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the toxicity, regrowth capacity, growth, physiology, and alterations in the metabolism of T. pallida after the application of different herbicide classes. The treatments consisted of spraying the herbicides: atrazine (1,500 g ha-1), diquat (300 g ha-1), carfentrazone (10 g ha-1), glyphosate (1,500 g ha-1), and 2,4-D (1,050 g ha-1) on T. pallida. Plants sprayed only with water represented the control group. The evaluations were carried out five days after the application of the herbicides. The evaluated variables were visual toxicity and regrowth index, chlorophyll a fluorescence, chlorophyll content (a, b and a + b), carotenoids and proline content. The herbicide 2,4-D did not act on the plant, but it may have produced a genotoxic effect. Glyphosate significantly increased the proline content and generated zero regrowth index, showing the plant's sensitivity to the herbicide. Carfentrazone was not fully effective in controlling T. pallida, which also did not show sensitivity to atrazine, but high sensitivity to diquat, despite the low proline content found. The different classes of herbicides act differently in terms of toxicity, regrowth, physiology and metabolism of T. pallida, these being useful variables to investigate the possible tolerance of plants to the different classes of herbicides.
id UNIFEI_ed9a63f72b3f99cc86bbded1f9312c5b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11452
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plantRespuesta diferencial a diferentes clases de herbicidas: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom como planta modeloResposta diferencial a diferentes classes de herbicidas: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom como planta modeloChemical controlToxicityPhysiologyMetabolismCommelinaceae.Control químicoToxicidadFisiologíaMetabolismoCommelinaceae.Controle químicoToxicidadeFisiologiaMetabolismoCommelinaceae.Tradescantia pallida is an ornamental plant widely found in flowerbeds and urban gardens. However, information about the physiological and biochemical responses of this ornamental plant to herbicides is scarce. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the toxicity, regrowth capacity, growth, physiology, and alterations in the metabolism of T. pallida after the application of different herbicide classes. The treatments consisted of spraying the herbicides: atrazine (1,500 g ha-1), diquat (300 g ha-1), carfentrazone (10 g ha-1), glyphosate (1,500 g ha-1), and 2,4-D (1,050 g ha-1) on T. pallida. Plants sprayed only with water represented the control group. The evaluations were carried out five days after the application of the herbicides. The evaluated variables were visual toxicity and regrowth index, chlorophyll a fluorescence, chlorophyll content (a, b and a + b), carotenoids and proline content. The herbicide 2,4-D did not act on the plant, but it may have produced a genotoxic effect. Glyphosate significantly increased the proline content and generated zero regrowth index, showing the plant's sensitivity to the herbicide. Carfentrazone was not fully effective in controlling T. pallida, which also did not show sensitivity to atrazine, but high sensitivity to diquat, despite the low proline content found. The different classes of herbicides act differently in terms of toxicity, regrowth, physiology and metabolism of T. pallida, these being useful variables to investigate the possible tolerance of plants to the different classes of herbicides.Tradescantia pallida es una planta ornamental que se encuentra ampliamente en parterres y jardines urbanos. Sin embargo, la información sobre las respuestas fisiológicas y bioquímicas de esta planta ornamental a los herbicidas son escasas. Por lo tanto, este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar la toxicidad, capacidad de rebrote, crecimiento, fisiología y alteraciones en el metabolismo de T. pallida luego de la aplicación de diferentes clases de herbicidas.  Los tratamientos consistieron en la aspersión de los herbicidas: atrazina (1,500 g ha-1), diquat (300 g ha-1), carfentrazona (10 g ha-1), glifosato (1,500 g ha-1) y 2,4-D (1.050 g ha-1) sobre T. pallida.  Las plantas rociadas solo con agua representaron el grupo de control. Las evaluaciones se realizaron 5 días después de la aplicación de los herbicidas. Se evaluó toxicidad visual e índice de rebrote, fluorescencia de clorofila a, contenido de clorofila (a, b y a + b), carotenoides y prolina. El herbicida 2,4-D no actuó sobre la planta, pero pudo haber producido un efecto genotóxico. El glifosato aumentó significativamente el contenido de prolina y generó un índice de crecimiento cero, lo que muestra la sensibilidad de la planta al herbicida. La carfentrazona no fue completamente efectiva en el control de T. pallida, que tampoco mostró sensibilidad a la atrazina, pero sí una alta sensibilidad al diquat, a pesar del bajo contenido de prolina encontrado. Las diferentes clases de herbicidas actúan de manera diferente en términos de toxicidad, rebrote, fisiología y metabolismo de T. pallida, variables útiles para investigar la posible tolerancia de las plantas a las diferentes clases de herbicidas.Tradescantia pallida é uma planta ornamental amplamente encontrada em canteiros e jardins urbanos. No entanto, informações sobres as respostas fisiológicas e bioquímicas dessa planta ornamental a herbicidas são escassas. Diante disso, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a toxicidade, capacidade de rebrota, crescimento, fisiologia, e alterações no metabolismo de T. pallida após aplicação de diferentes classes de herbicidas. Os tratamentos consistiram na pulverização dos herbicidas: atrazina (1.500 g ha-1), diquat (300 g ha-1), carfentrazone (10 g ha-1), glifosato (1.500 g ha-1) e 2,4-D (1.050 g ha-1) sobre T. pallida. Plantas pulverizadas somente com água representaram o grupo controle. As avaliações foram realizadas 5 dias após a aplicação dos herbicidas. Foi avaliado a toxicidade visual e índice de rebrota, fluorescência da clorofila a, conteúdo de clorofilas (a, b e a+b), carotenoides e prolina. O herbicida 2,4-D não atuou sobre a planta, mas pode ter produzido efeito genotóxico. Glifosato aumentou significativamente o teor de prolina e gerou índice zero de rebrota, evidenciando sensibilidade da planta ao herbicida. Carfentrazone não foi totalmente eficiente sobre o controle de T. pallida, que também não demonstrou sensibilidade a atrazina, mas alta sensibilidade a diquat, apesar do baixo teor de prolina verificado. As diferentes classes de herbicidas atuam de maneira diferente quanto à toxidez, rebrota, fisiologia e metabolismo de T. pallida, sendo estas, variáveis úteis para investigar a possível tolerância de plantas às diferentes classes de herbicidas.Research, Society and Development2021-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1145210.33448/rsd-v10i1.11452Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e6910111452Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e6910111452Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e69101114522525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11452/10263Copyright (c) 2021 Renato Fernando Menegazzo; Max Emerson Rickli; Juliana Scanavacca; Julliane Destro de Lima; Ana Cristina da Silveira; André Werlang Menegazzo; Silvia Graciele Hülse de Souza; Ana Daniela Lopeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenegazzo, Renato Fernando Rickli, Max Emerson Scanavacca, Juliana Lima, Julliane Destro deSilveira, Ana Cristina da Menegazzo, André Werlang Souza, Silvia Graciele Hülse de Lopes, Ana Daniela2021-02-20T21:19:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11452Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:16.570239Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
Respuesta diferencial a diferentes clases de herbicidas: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom como planta modelo
Resposta diferencial a diferentes classes de herbicidas: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom como planta modelo
title Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
spellingShingle Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
Menegazzo, Renato Fernando
Chemical control
Toxicity
Physiology
Metabolism
Commelinaceae.
Control químico
Toxicidad
Fisiología
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
Controle químico
Toxicidade
Fisiologia
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
title_short Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
title_full Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
title_fullStr Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
title_full_unstemmed Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
title_sort Differential response to different classes of herbicides: Tradescantia pallida (Rose) D. R. Hunt var. purpurea Boom as a model plant
author Menegazzo, Renato Fernando
author_facet Menegazzo, Renato Fernando
Rickli, Max Emerson
Scanavacca, Juliana
Lima, Julliane Destro de
Silveira, Ana Cristina da
Menegazzo, André Werlang
Souza, Silvia Graciele Hülse de
Lopes, Ana Daniela
author_role author
author2 Rickli, Max Emerson
Scanavacca, Juliana
Lima, Julliane Destro de
Silveira, Ana Cristina da
Menegazzo, André Werlang
Souza, Silvia Graciele Hülse de
Lopes, Ana Daniela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menegazzo, Renato Fernando
Rickli, Max Emerson
Scanavacca, Juliana
Lima, Julliane Destro de
Silveira, Ana Cristina da
Menegazzo, André Werlang
Souza, Silvia Graciele Hülse de
Lopes, Ana Daniela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chemical control
Toxicity
Physiology
Metabolism
Commelinaceae.
Control químico
Toxicidad
Fisiología
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
Controle químico
Toxicidade
Fisiologia
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
topic Chemical control
Toxicity
Physiology
Metabolism
Commelinaceae.
Control químico
Toxicidad
Fisiología
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
Controle químico
Toxicidade
Fisiologia
Metabolismo
Commelinaceae.
description Tradescantia pallida is an ornamental plant widely found in flowerbeds and urban gardens. However, information about the physiological and biochemical responses of this ornamental plant to herbicides is scarce. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the toxicity, regrowth capacity, growth, physiology, and alterations in the metabolism of T. pallida after the application of different herbicide classes. The treatments consisted of spraying the herbicides: atrazine (1,500 g ha-1), diquat (300 g ha-1), carfentrazone (10 g ha-1), glyphosate (1,500 g ha-1), and 2,4-D (1,050 g ha-1) on T. pallida. Plants sprayed only with water represented the control group. The evaluations were carried out five days after the application of the herbicides. The evaluated variables were visual toxicity and regrowth index, chlorophyll a fluorescence, chlorophyll content (a, b and a + b), carotenoids and proline content. The herbicide 2,4-D did not act on the plant, but it may have produced a genotoxic effect. Glyphosate significantly increased the proline content and generated zero regrowth index, showing the plant's sensitivity to the herbicide. Carfentrazone was not fully effective in controlling T. pallida, which also did not show sensitivity to atrazine, but high sensitivity to diquat, despite the low proline content found. The different classes of herbicides act differently in terms of toxicity, regrowth, physiology and metabolism of T. pallida, these being useful variables to investigate the possible tolerance of plants to the different classes of herbicides.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11452
10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11452
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11452
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11452
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11452/10263
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e6910111452
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e6910111452
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e6910111452
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052744251473920