Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13009 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the phenomenon of judicial activism in the game of Law, whose relevance is justified by the democratic crisis installed in Brazil. Therefore, therefore was a concern to make a historical recovery of its context, the differentiation between judicial activism and the judicialization of public policies, and the confrontation of two antagonistic doctrinal positions: Luís Roberto Barroso and Lenio Luiz Streck. The work still permeates discussions about the vulnerability of democracy and its rules game, impacted by the application of an “activism” to the inside of the Executive Power and activist judicial decisions handed down when it is going through a COVID-19 pandemic, based on values personal of their respective institutional representatives, who act as constitutional interpreters. The research used the deductive methodology through bibliographic research, including national and foreign authors, in addition to recent judicial decisions that demonstrate how the current health crisis is being dealt with. |
id |
UNIFEI_fa35e457a147b7600b85bcc1ab39fb1b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13009 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play¿Es el activism judicial um juego sin juego limpio? Ley e juegoO ativismo judicial é um jogo sem fair play? Direito e BrincadeiraDerechoBromaJuegoActivismo judicialJudicializaciónPandemiaCOVID-19.DireitoBrincadeiraJogoAtivismo judicialJudiacializaçãoPandemiaCOVID-19.RightPlayGameJudicial activismJudicializationPandemiaCOVID-19.This article aims to analyze the phenomenon of judicial activism in the game of Law, whose relevance is justified by the democratic crisis installed in Brazil. Therefore, therefore was a concern to make a historical recovery of its context, the differentiation between judicial activism and the judicialization of public policies, and the confrontation of two antagonistic doctrinal positions: Luís Roberto Barroso and Lenio Luiz Streck. The work still permeates discussions about the vulnerability of democracy and its rules game, impacted by the application of an “activism” to the inside of the Executive Power and activist judicial decisions handed down when it is going through a COVID-19 pandemic, based on values personal of their respective institutional representatives, who act as constitutional interpreters. The research used the deductive methodology through bibliographic research, including national and foreign authors, in addition to recent judicial decisions that demonstrate how the current health crisis is being dealt with.Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar el fenómeno del activismo judicial en el juego de la Ley, cuya relevancia está justificada por la crisis democrática instalada en Brasil. Por eso, se preocupó por hacer un rescate histórico de su contexto, la diferenciación entre activismo judicial y judicialización de políticas públicas, y el enfrentamiento de dos posiciones doctrinales opuestas: la de Luís Roberto Barroso y la de Lenio Luiz Streck. La obra aún permea discusiones sobre la vulnerabilidad de la democracia y las reglas de su juego, impactadas por la aplicación de un “activismo” al interior del Poder Ejecutivo y decisiones judiciales activistas dictadas cuando atraviesa una pandemia de COVID-19, basada en valores. datos personales de sus respectivos representantes institucionales, quienes actúan como intérpretes constitucionales. La investigación utilizó la metodología deductiva a través de investigaciones bibliográficas, incluyendo autores nacionales y extranjeros, además de recientes decisiones judiciales que demuestran cómo se está afrontando la actual crisis de salud.O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar o fenômeno do ativismo judicial no jogo do Direito, cuja relevância justifica-se pela crise democrática instalada no Brasil. Para tanto, houve a preocupação em se fazer um resgate histórico do seu contexto, a diferenciação entre ativismo judicial e judicialização de políticas públicas, e o enfrentamento de duas posições doutrinárias antagônicas: a de Luís Roberto Barroso e a de Lenio Luiz Streck. O trabalho ainda permeia discussões sobre a vulnerabilidade da democracia e as regras de seu jogo, impactados pela aplicação de um “ativismo” às avessas do Poder Executivo e decisões judiciais ativistas proferidas no momento em que passa por pandemia do COVID-19, fundadas em valores pessoais de seus respectivos representantes institucionais, que atuam como intérpretes constitucionais. A pesquisa utilizou-se da metodologia dedutiva por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica, incluindo autores nacionais e estrangeiros, além de decisões judiciais recentes que demonstram como se está lidando com a atual crise sanitária.Research, Society and Development2021-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1300910.33448/rsd-v10i3.13009Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e9010313009Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e9010313009Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e90103130092525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13009/11765Copyright (c) 2021 Janaina de Castro Marchi Medina; Renata Maria Silveira Toledohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedina, Janaina de Castro Marchi Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira 2021-03-28T12:03:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13009Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:34:25.957203Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play ¿Es el activism judicial um juego sin juego limpio? Ley e juego O ativismo judicial é um jogo sem fair play? Direito e Brincadeira |
title |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
spellingShingle |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play Medina, Janaina de Castro Marchi Derecho Broma Juego Activismo judicial Judicialización Pandemia COVID-19. Direito Brincadeira Jogo Ativismo judicial Judiacialização Pandemia COVID-19. Right Play Game Judicial activism Judicialization Pandemia COVID-19. |
title_short |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
title_full |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
title_fullStr |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
title_sort |
Is judicial activism a game without fair play? Law and play |
author |
Medina, Janaina de Castro Marchi |
author_facet |
Medina, Janaina de Castro Marchi Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medina, Janaina de Castro Marchi Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Derecho Broma Juego Activismo judicial Judicialización Pandemia COVID-19. Direito Brincadeira Jogo Ativismo judicial Judiacialização Pandemia COVID-19. Right Play Game Judicial activism Judicialization Pandemia COVID-19. |
topic |
Derecho Broma Juego Activismo judicial Judicialización Pandemia COVID-19. Direito Brincadeira Jogo Ativismo judicial Judiacialização Pandemia COVID-19. Right Play Game Judicial activism Judicialization Pandemia COVID-19. |
description |
This article aims to analyze the phenomenon of judicial activism in the game of Law, whose relevance is justified by the democratic crisis installed in Brazil. Therefore, therefore was a concern to make a historical recovery of its context, the differentiation between judicial activism and the judicialization of public policies, and the confrontation of two antagonistic doctrinal positions: Luís Roberto Barroso and Lenio Luiz Streck. The work still permeates discussions about the vulnerability of democracy and its rules game, impacted by the application of an “activism” to the inside of the Executive Power and activist judicial decisions handed down when it is going through a COVID-19 pandemic, based on values personal of their respective institutional representatives, who act as constitutional interpreters. The research used the deductive methodology through bibliographic research, including national and foreign authors, in addition to recent judicial decisions that demonstrate how the current health crisis is being dealt with. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13009 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13009 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13009 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13009/11765 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Janaina de Castro Marchi Medina; Renata Maria Silveira Toledo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Janaina de Castro Marchi Medina; Renata Maria Silveira Toledo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e9010313009 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e9010313009 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e9010313009 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052746295148544 |