Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5483 |
Resumo: | This article investigates perceptions of masters and doctorates students in Administration regarding the use of the portfolio as a self-regulated learning tool. The model of Pintrich (2000), which comprises as cognitive, motivational, behavioral and context areas, was used as theoretical basis for the content of these perceptions, particularly as the reaction and reflection phase. In the data collection, participative observation and documents, obtained from the self-assessments of the students. Data were analyzed by the content analysis and clustering. The results showed that the methodology employed enhanced learning, making the discourses more active and self - critical. Four clusters were identified that portrayed students' perceptions of learning and adaptability to the methodological proposal of self-regulation: immediate adopters, adaptive majority, cautious and resistant. It was possible to identify the positive and negative axes related to the adaptability to the use of the portfolio. The study corroborates the idea of feasibility and effectiveness of the portfolio tool as an alternative methodology to the traditional teaching and learning evaluation model. |
id |
UNIFEI_fd1bde84a73f2488f633b313f548d6df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5483 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptionsAprendizaje autorregulado con el uso de cartera: análisis de las percepciones de los estudiantesAprendizagem autorregulada com o uso de portfólio: análises sobre percepções discentesActive methodologySelf-regulated learningPortfolio.Metodología activaAprendizaje auto-reguladoPortfolio.Metodologia ativaAprendizagem autorreguladaPortfólio.This article investigates perceptions of masters and doctorates students in Administration regarding the use of the portfolio as a self-regulated learning tool. The model of Pintrich (2000), which comprises as cognitive, motivational, behavioral and context areas, was used as theoretical basis for the content of these perceptions, particularly as the reaction and reflection phase. In the data collection, participative observation and documents, obtained from the self-assessments of the students. Data were analyzed by the content analysis and clustering. The results showed that the methodology employed enhanced learning, making the discourses more active and self - critical. Four clusters were identified that portrayed students' perceptions of learning and adaptability to the methodological proposal of self-regulation: immediate adopters, adaptive majority, cautious and resistant. It was possible to identify the positive and negative axes related to the adaptability to the use of the portfolio. The study corroborates the idea of feasibility and effectiveness of the portfolio tool as an alternative methodology to the traditional teaching and learning evaluation model.Este artículo investiga las percepciones de los estudiantes de maestría y doctorado en Administración en cuanto al uso del portfolio como herramienta de aprendizaje autorregulada. El modelo de Pintrich (2000), el cual comprende las áreas cognitiva, motivacional, comportamental y de contexto, fue la base teórica para comprender esas percepciones, particularmente en cuanto a la fase reacción y reflexión. Se utilizó observación participante y documentos, obtenidos de las autoevaluaciones de los discentes. Los datos fueron analizados por medio del análisis de contenido y de clusters. Los resultados mostraron que la metodología empleada potenció el aprendizaje, haciendo los discentes más activos y autocríticos. Se identificaron cuatro clusters que retratar las percepciones de aprendizaje y de adaptabilidad de los discentes a la propuesta metodológica de la autorregulación: adoptivos inmediatos, mayoría adaptativa, cautelosos y resistentes. Fue posible identificar los ejes positivos y negativos relacionados con la adaptabilidad al uso de la cartera. El estudio corrobora la idea de viabilidad y eficacia de la herramienta de cartera como metodología alternativa al modelo tradicional de enseñanza y de evaluación del aprendizaje.Este artigo investiga as percepções de discentes de mestrado e doutorado em Administração quanto ao uso do portfólio como ferramenta de aprendizagem autorregulada. O modelo de Pintrich (2000), o qual compreende as áreas cognitiva, motivacional, comportamental e de contexto, foi a base teórica para compreender essas percepções, particularmente quanto à fase reação e reflexão. Na coleta de dados, foi utilizada observação participante e documentos, obtidos das autoavaliações dos discentes. Os dados foram analisados por meio da análise de conteúdo e de clusters. Os resultados mostraram que a metodologia empregada potencializou a aprendizagem, tornando os discentes mais ativos e autocríticos. Foram identificados quatro clusters que retrataram as percepções de aprendizado e de adaptabilidade dos discentes à proposta metodológica da autorregulação: adotantes imediatos, maioria adaptativa, cautelosos e resistentes. Foi possível visualizar os eixos positivos e negativos relacionados com a adaptabilidade ao uso do portfólio. O estudo corrobora a ideia de viabilidade e eficácia da ferramenta de portfólio como metodologia alternativa ao modelo tradicional de ensino e de avaliação da aprendizagem.Research, Society and Development2020-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/548310.33448/rsd-v9i8.5483Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e311985483Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e311985483Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e3119854832525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5483/4842Copyright (c) 2020 Marlene Medeiros, Aline Soares Dantas, Anatália Saraiva Martins Ramos, Guilherme Smaniotto Tres, Marcus Vinicius Dantas de Assunçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, MarleneDantas, Aline SoaresTres, Guilherme SmaniottoRamos, Anatália Saraiva MartinsAssunção, Marcus Vinicius Dantas de2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5483Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:59.422824Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions Aprendizaje autorregulado con el uso de cartera: análisis de las percepciones de los estudiantes Aprendizagem autorregulada com o uso de portfólio: análises sobre percepções discentes |
title |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
spellingShingle |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions Medeiros, Marlene Active methodology Self-regulated learning Portfolio. Metodología activa Aprendizaje auto-regulado Portfolio. Metodologia ativa Aprendizagem autorregulada Portfólio. |
title_short |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
title_full |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
title_fullStr |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
title_sort |
Self-Regulated learning with the use of portfolio: analysis of student perceptions |
author |
Medeiros, Marlene |
author_facet |
Medeiros, Marlene Dantas, Aline Soares Tres, Guilherme Smaniotto Ramos, Anatália Saraiva Martins Assunção, Marcus Vinicius Dantas de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dantas, Aline Soares Tres, Guilherme Smaniotto Ramos, Anatália Saraiva Martins Assunção, Marcus Vinicius Dantas de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros, Marlene Dantas, Aline Soares Tres, Guilherme Smaniotto Ramos, Anatália Saraiva Martins Assunção, Marcus Vinicius Dantas de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Active methodology Self-regulated learning Portfolio. Metodología activa Aprendizaje auto-regulado Portfolio. Metodologia ativa Aprendizagem autorregulada Portfólio. |
topic |
Active methodology Self-regulated learning Portfolio. Metodología activa Aprendizaje auto-regulado Portfolio. Metodologia ativa Aprendizagem autorregulada Portfólio. |
description |
This article investigates perceptions of masters and doctorates students in Administration regarding the use of the portfolio as a self-regulated learning tool. The model of Pintrich (2000), which comprises as cognitive, motivational, behavioral and context areas, was used as theoretical basis for the content of these perceptions, particularly as the reaction and reflection phase. In the data collection, participative observation and documents, obtained from the self-assessments of the students. Data were analyzed by the content analysis and clustering. The results showed that the methodology employed enhanced learning, making the discourses more active and self - critical. Four clusters were identified that portrayed students' perceptions of learning and adaptability to the methodological proposal of self-regulation: immediate adopters, adaptive majority, cautious and resistant. It was possible to identify the positive and negative axes related to the adaptability to the use of the portfolio. The study corroborates the idea of feasibility and effectiveness of the portfolio tool as an alternative methodology to the traditional teaching and learning evaluation model. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5483 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5483 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5483 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5483 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5483/4842 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e311985483 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e311985483 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e311985483 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052737564704768 |