Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34773 |
Resumo: | The COVID-19 pandemic has been declared since March 11, 2020. Until December 2020, the absence of specific treatments or vaccines for COVID-19 implied the need to use non-pharmacological strategies to reduce infection rates. This study aimed to track and compare the policy responses of countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world. Was performed a scoping search in five databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science and Google Scholar) between December 1, 2019 and April 30, 2020. Information on policy and health on official websites of the listed countries was also searched. After the selection process, which was carried out independently by two evaluators following the previously established criteria, 55 titles were included. Of the 18 documents of national health societies, 13 addressed the prevention of COVID-19. The most reported country was Italy (17). The strategies most cited by the studies are: traveler monitoring, international travel controls, social distancing orders, closure schools and universities, partial and total lockdown. Until the end of April, all countries evaluated, United States, Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Belgium, Germany, Iran, Brazil and the Netherlands, have adopted measures such as social distancing orders and the closure of schools and universities. Except for Iran, all these countries have adopted some type of lockdown. So far (August, 2022), Germany has already been cited as an example of a successful country in controlling the pandemic, while the United States still has the highest numbers in the world in total cases, total deaths and new deaths weekly from COVID-19. |
id |
UNIFEI_fdcb412350645f7d86453da0cebd52e4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34773 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping reviewRespuestas de política de países con el mayor número de muertes por COVID-19 en el mundo: una revisión de alcanceRespostas políticas de países com o maior número de mortes por COVID-19 no mundo: uma revisão de escopoCOVID-19Infecciones por CoronavirusPandemiasSalud PúblicaPolítica de salud.COVID-19Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPublic HealthHealth policy.COVID-19PandemiasSaúde PúblicaInfecções por coronavírusPolítica de saúde.The COVID-19 pandemic has been declared since March 11, 2020. Until December 2020, the absence of specific treatments or vaccines for COVID-19 implied the need to use non-pharmacological strategies to reduce infection rates. This study aimed to track and compare the policy responses of countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world. Was performed a scoping search in five databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science and Google Scholar) between December 1, 2019 and April 30, 2020. Information on policy and health on official websites of the listed countries was also searched. After the selection process, which was carried out independently by two evaluators following the previously established criteria, 55 titles were included. Of the 18 documents of national health societies, 13 addressed the prevention of COVID-19. The most reported country was Italy (17). The strategies most cited by the studies are: traveler monitoring, international travel controls, social distancing orders, closure schools and universities, partial and total lockdown. Until the end of April, all countries evaluated, United States, Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Belgium, Germany, Iran, Brazil and the Netherlands, have adopted measures such as social distancing orders and the closure of schools and universities. Except for Iran, all these countries have adopted some type of lockdown. So far (August, 2022), Germany has already been cited as an example of a successful country in controlling the pandemic, while the United States still has the highest numbers in the world in total cases, total deaths and new deaths weekly from COVID-19.La pandemia de COVID-19 fue declarada el 11 de marzo de 2020. Hasta diciembre de 2020, la ausencia de tratamientos o vacunas específicas para COVID-19 implicó la necesidad de utilizar estrategias no farmacológicas para reducir las tasas de infección. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo rastrear y comparar las respuestas políticas de los países con el mayor número de muertes por COVID-19 en el mundo. Realizamos una búsqueda de alcance en cinco bases de datos (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science y Google Scholar) entre el 1 de diciembre de 2019 y el 30 de abril de 2020. También se buscó información sobre políticas y salud en los sitios web oficiales de los países enumerados. Tras el proceso de selección, que se llevó a cabo de forma independiente por dos evaluadores siguiendo los criterios previamente establecidos, se incluyeron 55 títulos. De los 18 documentos de las sociedades nacionales de salud, 13 abordaron la prevención de la COVID-19. El país más informado fue Italia (17). Las estrategias más citadas por los estudios fueron: monitoreo de viajeros, controles de viajes internacionales, órdenes de distanciamiento social, cierre de escuelas y universidades, bloqueo parcial y total. A fine de abril, todos los países evaluados, Estados Unidos, Italia, Reino Unido, España, Francia, Bélgica, Alemania, Irán, Brasil y Holanda, habían adoptado medidas como órdenes de distanciamiento social y cierre de escuelas y universidades. A excepción de Irán, todos estos países han adoptado algún tipo de bloqueo. Hasta el momento (Agosto de 2022), Alemania ya ha sido citada como ejemplo de país exitoso en el control de la pandemia, mientras que Estados Unidos aún tiene las cifras más altas del mundo en casos totales, muertes totales y nuevas muertes semanales por contagios de COVID-19.A pandemia de COVID-19 foi declarada em 11 de Março de 2020. Até dezembro de 2020, a ausência de tratamentos ou vacinas específicas para COVID-19 implicou na necessidade de utilização de estratégias não farmacológicas para redução das taxas de infecção. Este estudo teve como objetivo rastrear e comparar as respostas políticas dos países com o maior número de mortes por COVID-19 no mundo. Realizamos uma busca de escopo em cinco bases de dados (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science e Google acadêmico) entre 1º de Dezembro de 2019 e 30 de Abril de 2020. Também foram pesquisadas informações em sites oficiais dos países listados, sobre políticas e saúde. Após o processo de seleção, que foi realizado independentemente por dois avaliadores seguindo os critérios previamente estabelecidos, 55 títulos foram incluídos. Dos 18 documentos das sociedades nacionais de saúde, 13 abordaram a prevenção da COVID-19. O país mais relatado foi a Itália (17). As estratégias mais citadas pelos estudos foram: monitoramento de viajantes, controles de viagens internacionais, ordens de distanciamento social, fechamento de escolas e universidades, bloqueio parcial e total. Até o final de Abril, todos os países avaliados, Estados Unidos, Itália, Reino Unido, Espanha, França, Bélgica, Alemanha, Irã, Brasil e Holanda, adotaram medidas como ordens de distanciamento social e fechamento de escolas e universidades. Com exceção do Irã, todos esses países adotaram algum bloqueio. Até o momento (Agosto de 2022), a Alemanha já foi citada como exemplo de país bem-sucedido no controle da pandemia, enquanto os Estados Unidos ainda apresentam os maiores números do mundo em total de casos, total de óbitos e novas mortes semanais por COVID- 19.Research, Society and Development2022-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3477310.33448/rsd-v11i12.34773Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e546111234773Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e546111234773Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e5461112347732525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34773/29358Copyright (c) 2022 Alana Teles Costa; Lysandro Pinto Borges; Renata Ferraz Figueiredo; Marcio Lima da Conceição Vieira; Mairim Russo Serafini; Cristiani Isabel Banderó Walkerhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Alana TelesBorges, Lysandro PintoFigueiredo, Renata FerrazVieira, Marcio Lima da ConceiçãoSerafini, Mairim RussoWalker, Cristiani Isabel Banderó2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34773Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:56.188940Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review Respuestas de política de países con el mayor número de muertes por COVID-19 en el mundo: una revisión de alcance Respostas políticas de países com o maior número de mortes por COVID-19 no mundo: uma revisão de escopo |
title |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review Costa, Alana Teles COVID-19 Infecciones por Coronavirus Pandemias Salud Pública Política de salud. COVID-19 Coronavirus Infections Pandemics Public Health Health policy. COVID-19 Pandemias Saúde Pública Infecções por coronavírus Política de saúde. |
title_short |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
title_full |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
title_sort |
Policy responses from countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world: a scoping review |
author |
Costa, Alana Teles |
author_facet |
Costa, Alana Teles Borges, Lysandro Pinto Figueiredo, Renata Ferraz Vieira, Marcio Lima da Conceição Serafini, Mairim Russo Walker, Cristiani Isabel Banderó |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges, Lysandro Pinto Figueiredo, Renata Ferraz Vieira, Marcio Lima da Conceição Serafini, Mairim Russo Walker, Cristiani Isabel Banderó |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Alana Teles Borges, Lysandro Pinto Figueiredo, Renata Ferraz Vieira, Marcio Lima da Conceição Serafini, Mairim Russo Walker, Cristiani Isabel Banderó |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 Infecciones por Coronavirus Pandemias Salud Pública Política de salud. COVID-19 Coronavirus Infections Pandemics Public Health Health policy. COVID-19 Pandemias Saúde Pública Infecções por coronavírus Política de saúde. |
topic |
COVID-19 Infecciones por Coronavirus Pandemias Salud Pública Política de salud. COVID-19 Coronavirus Infections Pandemics Public Health Health policy. COVID-19 Pandemias Saúde Pública Infecções por coronavírus Política de saúde. |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic has been declared since March 11, 2020. Until December 2020, the absence of specific treatments or vaccines for COVID-19 implied the need to use non-pharmacological strategies to reduce infection rates. This study aimed to track and compare the policy responses of countries with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world. Was performed a scoping search in five databases (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science and Google Scholar) between December 1, 2019 and April 30, 2020. Information on policy and health on official websites of the listed countries was also searched. After the selection process, which was carried out independently by two evaluators following the previously established criteria, 55 titles were included. Of the 18 documents of national health societies, 13 addressed the prevention of COVID-19. The most reported country was Italy (17). The strategies most cited by the studies are: traveler monitoring, international travel controls, social distancing orders, closure schools and universities, partial and total lockdown. Until the end of April, all countries evaluated, United States, Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Belgium, Germany, Iran, Brazil and the Netherlands, have adopted measures such as social distancing orders and the closure of schools and universities. Except for Iran, all these countries have adopted some type of lockdown. So far (August, 2022), Germany has already been cited as an example of a successful country in controlling the pandemic, while the United States still has the highest numbers in the world in total cases, total deaths and new deaths weekly from COVID-19. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34773 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34773 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34773 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34773 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34773/29358 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e546111234773 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e546111234773 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e546111234773 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052837448908800 |