Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19915 |
Resumo: | This study aims to describe and compare two review methods - systematic and scoping - in addition to analyzing the use of these methods in studies in the area of patient care in pharmacy. The articles used to support this work were selected from the following databases: Google scholar, PubMed, and Scielo. The study was divided into two stages: 1) Description and comparison of two literature review methods: systematic review and scoping review; 2) Analysis and comparison of the use of scoping and systematic reviews in the area of patient care in Pharmacy. It was found that the methods for preparing the studied reviews follow a systematic and well-structured process, but they differ in terms of some methodological elements not observed in the scoping review, such as quality assessment of included studies and more advanced statistical analyses. The systematic review analyzed, unlike the scoping review, did not meet the criteria proposed for its preparation in the stages of selection and evaluation of the quality of studies. It is concluded that, although the reviews are aimed at different objectives, both present a careful methodology. Correctly associating the research question with the type of review is crucial for conducting the study. |
| id |
UNIFEI_ffe03a77723c6aeb2896403e3a2bd771 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19915 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy Comparación y análisis del uso de la revisión sistemática y revisión del alcance en el área de atención al paciente en FarmaciaComparação e análise do uso de revisão sistemática e revisão de escopo na área do cuidado ao paciente na FarmáciaRevisão de EscopoRevisão SistemáticaEstudo ComparativoAssistência ao PacienteServiços farmacêuticos.Scoping ReviewSystematic reviewComparative studyPatient carePharmaceutical services.Revisión del alcanceRevisión sistemáticaEstudio comparativoAsistencia al pacienteServicios farmaceuticos.This study aims to describe and compare two review methods - systematic and scoping - in addition to analyzing the use of these methods in studies in the area of patient care in pharmacy. The articles used to support this work were selected from the following databases: Google scholar, PubMed, and Scielo. The study was divided into two stages: 1) Description and comparison of two literature review methods: systematic review and scoping review; 2) Analysis and comparison of the use of scoping and systematic reviews in the area of patient care in Pharmacy. It was found that the methods for preparing the studied reviews follow a systematic and well-structured process, but they differ in terms of some methodological elements not observed in the scoping review, such as quality assessment of included studies and more advanced statistical analyses. The systematic review analyzed, unlike the scoping review, did not meet the criteria proposed for its preparation in the stages of selection and evaluation of the quality of studies. It is concluded that, although the reviews are aimed at different objectives, both present a careful methodology. Correctly associating the research question with the type of review is crucial for conducting the study.Este estudio tiene como objetivo describir y comparar dos métodos de revisión, sistemático y de alcance, además de analizar el uso de estos métodos en estudios en el área de atención al paciente en farmacia. Los artículos utilizados para apoyar este trabajo fueron seleccionados de las siguientes bases de datos: Google Scholar, PubMed y Scielo. El estudio se dividió en dos etapas: 1) Descripción y comparación de dos métodos de revisión de la literatura: revisión sistemática y revisión del alcance; 2) Análisis y comparación del uso del alcance y revisiones sistemáticas en el área de atención al paciente en Farmacia. Se encontró que los métodos para preparar las revisiones estudiadas siguen un proceso sistemático y bien estructurado, pero difieren en términos de algunos elementos metodológicos no observados en la revisión del alcance, como la evaluación de la calidad de los estudios incluidos y análisis estadísticos más avanzados. La revisión sistemática analizada, a diferencia de la revisión de alcance, no cumplió con los criterios propuestos para su elaboración en las etapas de selección y evaluación de la calidad de los estudios. Se concluye que, si bien las revisiones están dirigidas a objetivos diferentes, ambas presentan una metodología cuidada. Asociar correctamente la pregunta de investigación con el tipo de revisión es crucial para realizar el estudio.O presente estudo tem como objetivo descrever e comparar dois métodos de revisão - sistemática e de escopo – além de analisar o uso destes métodos em estudos na área do cuidado ao paciente na farmácia. Os artigos utilizados para fundamentar este trabalho foram selecionados nas bases de dados: Google scholar, PubMed e Scielo. O estudo foi dividido em duas etapas: 1) Descrição e comparação de dois métodos de revisão da literatura: revisão sistemática e a revisão de escopo; 2) Análise e comparação do uso de revisões de escopo e sistemática na área de cuidado ao paciente na Farmácia. Constatou-se que os métodos para a elaboração das revisões estudadas seguem um processo sistemático e bem estruturado, mas se diferem quanto a alguns elementos metodológicos não observados na revisão de escopo, como a avaliação da qualidade dos estudos incluídos e análises estatísticas mais avançadas. A revisão sistemática analisada, ao contrário da revisão de escopo, não atendeu aos critérios propostos para a sua elaboração nas etapas de seleção e avaliação da qualidade dos estudos. Conclui-se que, embora as revisões se destinem a objetivos diferentes, ambas apresentam uma metodologia criteriosa. Associar corretamente a pergunta de pesquisa com o tipo de revisão é crucial para a condução do estudo.Research, Society and Development2021-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1991510.33448/rsd-v10i12.19915Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e08101219915Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e08101219915Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e081012199152525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19915/17912Copyright (c) 2021 Tatiane Perusse Coelho; Cristiane de Paula Rezende; Maria do Carmo Vilas Boas Sousa; Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Pereira; Simone de Araújo Medina Mendonçahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho, Tatiane Perusse Rezende, Cristiane de Paula Sousa, Maria do Carmo Vilas Boas Pereira, Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Mendonça, Simone de Araújo Medina 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19915Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:42.129663Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy Comparación y análisis del uso de la revisión sistemática y revisión del alcance en el área de atención al paciente en Farmacia Comparação e análise do uso de revisão sistemática e revisão de escopo na área do cuidado ao paciente na Farmácia |
| title |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy Coelho, Tatiane Perusse Revisão de Escopo Revisão Sistemática Estudo Comparativo Assistência ao Paciente Serviços farmacêuticos. Scoping Review Systematic review Comparative study Patient care Pharmaceutical services. Revisión del alcance Revisión sistemática Estudio comparativo Asistencia al paciente Servicios farmaceuticos. |
| title_short |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| title_full |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| title_sort |
Comparison and analysis of the use of systematic review and scoping review in the area of patient care in Pharmacy |
| author |
Coelho, Tatiane Perusse |
| author_facet |
Coelho, Tatiane Perusse Rezende, Cristiane de Paula Sousa, Maria do Carmo Vilas Boas Pereira, Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Mendonça, Simone de Araújo Medina |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Rezende, Cristiane de Paula Sousa, Maria do Carmo Vilas Boas Pereira, Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Mendonça, Simone de Araújo Medina |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coelho, Tatiane Perusse Rezende, Cristiane de Paula Sousa, Maria do Carmo Vilas Boas Pereira, Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Mendonça, Simone de Araújo Medina |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Revisão de Escopo Revisão Sistemática Estudo Comparativo Assistência ao Paciente Serviços farmacêuticos. Scoping Review Systematic review Comparative study Patient care Pharmaceutical services. Revisión del alcance Revisión sistemática Estudio comparativo Asistencia al paciente Servicios farmaceuticos. |
| topic |
Revisão de Escopo Revisão Sistemática Estudo Comparativo Assistência ao Paciente Serviços farmacêuticos. Scoping Review Systematic review Comparative study Patient care Pharmaceutical services. Revisión del alcance Revisión sistemática Estudio comparativo Asistencia al paciente Servicios farmaceuticos. |
| description |
This study aims to describe and compare two review methods - systematic and scoping - in addition to analyzing the use of these methods in studies in the area of patient care in pharmacy. The articles used to support this work were selected from the following databases: Google scholar, PubMed, and Scielo. The study was divided into two stages: 1) Description and comparison of two literature review methods: systematic review and scoping review; 2) Analysis and comparison of the use of scoping and systematic reviews in the area of patient care in Pharmacy. It was found that the methods for preparing the studied reviews follow a systematic and well-structured process, but they differ in terms of some methodological elements not observed in the scoping review, such as quality assessment of included studies and more advanced statistical analyses. The systematic review analyzed, unlike the scoping review, did not meet the criteria proposed for its preparation in the stages of selection and evaluation of the quality of studies. It is concluded that, although the reviews are aimed at different objectives, both present a careful methodology. Correctly associating the research question with the type of review is crucial for conducting the study. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-12 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19915 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.19915 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19915 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.19915 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19915/17912 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e08101219915 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e08101219915 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e08101219915 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052808304787456 |