“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Almanack (Guarulhos) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805 |
Resumo: | This article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies. |
id |
UNIFESP-2_a380e5618abacb2fbf4d2d488917f07e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14805 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFESP-2 |
network_name_str |
Almanack (Guarulhos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)PetiçõesConselho UltramarinoImpério PortuguêsProvisõesThis article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies.O objetivo do artigo é examinar o mecanismo peticionário como modalidade particular de comunicação política entre os vassalos do ultramar português e o monarca, a partir de seu Conselho Ultramarino. Pretende-se perscrutar os vários usos das petições e seus enquadramentos nas lógicas governativas da colonização enquanto um canal institucional amplo, multifacetado e dinâmico de relacionamento entre as pessoas e o poder régio sediado em Lisboa. Considerando as potencialidades analíticas da reconstituição ordenada do circuito petição – forma de tramitação – resposta, parto do corpus documental tutelado pelo Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino, cotejando tanto a documentação peticionária propriamente dita, na forma dos Avulsos, como os circuitos decisórios plasmados nos livros de registro da instituição (Códices). Em um primeiro momento, faço uma análise discursivo-formal das petições. Em seguida, discuto as dinâmicas jurídico-institucionais de tratamento e resposta das petições das partes, a partir dos Livros de Registro de Provisões do Conselho Ultramarino. A principal hipótese defendida é a de que as petições e suas vias de tramitação e resposta sinalizam para práticas de governança, modelos de submissão e formas de controle nem sempre explicitados pela historiografia ou consideradas como meramente protocolares. Elas são, não obstante, reveladoras das práticas institucionais do complexo organizacional régio português em suas relações com as sociedades coloniais.Universidade Federal de São Paulo2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/1480510.1590/2236-463334ed00123Almanack; No. 34 (2023)Almanack; Núm. 34 (2023)Almanack; n. 34 (2023)2236-4633reponame:Almanack (Guarulhos)instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPporhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805/11108Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Renata Silva2023-08-23T23:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14805Revistahttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/almPUBhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/oaialmanack@unifesp.br||andremachados@yahoo.com.br2236-46332236-4633opendoar:2023-08-23T23:18:56Almanack (Guarulhos) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
title |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
spellingShingle |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) Fernandes, Renata Silva Petições Conselho Ultramarino Império Português Provisões |
title_short |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
title_full |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
title_fullStr |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
title_sort |
“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII) |
author |
Fernandes, Renata Silva |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Renata Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Renata Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Petições Conselho Ultramarino Império Português Provisões |
topic |
Petições Conselho Ultramarino Império Português Provisões |
description |
This article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805 10.1590/2236-463334ed00123 |
url |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/2236-463334ed00123 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805/11108 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Almanack; No. 34 (2023) Almanack; Núm. 34 (2023) Almanack; n. 34 (2023) 2236-4633 reponame:Almanack (Guarulhos) instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Almanack (Guarulhos) |
collection |
Almanack (Guarulhos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Almanack (Guarulhos) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
almanack@unifesp.br||andremachados@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1800217299296190464 |