“Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Renata Silva
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Almanack (Guarulhos)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805
Resumo: This article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies.
id UNIFESP-2_a380e5618abacb2fbf4d2d488917f07e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14805
network_acronym_str UNIFESP-2
network_name_str Almanack (Guarulhos)
repository_id_str
spelling “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)PetiçõesConselho UltramarinoImpério PortuguêsProvisõesThis article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies.O objetivo do artigo é examinar o mecanismo peticionário como modalidade particular de comunicação política entre os vassalos do ultramar português e o monarca, a partir de seu Conselho Ultramarino. Pretende-se perscrutar os vários usos das petições e seus enquadramentos nas lógicas governativas da colonização enquanto um canal institucional amplo, multifacetado e dinâmico de relacionamento entre as pessoas e o poder régio sediado em Lisboa. Considerando as potencialidades analíticas da reconstituição ordenada do circuito petição – forma de tramitação – resposta, parto do corpus documental tutelado pelo Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino, cotejando tanto a documentação peticionária propriamente dita, na forma dos Avulsos, como os circuitos decisórios plasmados nos livros de registro da instituição (Códices). Em um primeiro momento, faço uma análise discursivo-formal das petições. Em seguida, discuto as dinâmicas jurídico-institucionais de tratamento e resposta das petições das partes, a partir dos Livros de Registro de Provisões do Conselho Ultramarino. A principal hipótese defendida é a de que as petições e suas vias de tramitação e resposta sinalizam para práticas de governança, modelos de submissão e formas de controle nem sempre explicitados pela historiografia ou consideradas como meramente protocolares. Elas são, não obstante, reveladoras das práticas institucionais do complexo organizacional régio português em suas relações com as sociedades coloniais.Universidade Federal de São Paulo2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/1480510.1590/2236-463334ed00123Almanack; No. 34 (2023)Almanack; Núm. 34 (2023)Almanack; n. 34 (2023)2236-4633reponame:Almanack (Guarulhos)instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPporhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805/11108Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Renata Silva2023-08-23T23:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14805Revistahttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/almPUBhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/oaialmanack@unifesp.br||andremachados@yahoo.com.br2236-46332236-4633opendoar:2023-08-23T23:18:56Almanack (Guarulhos) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
title “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
spellingShingle “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
Fernandes, Renata Silva
Petições
Conselho Ultramarino
Império Português
Provisões
title_short “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
title_full “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
title_fullStr “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
title_full_unstemmed “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
title_sort “Na Real presença de Vossa Majestade": as petições ultramarinas e a governação colonial (século XVIII)
author Fernandes, Renata Silva
author_facet Fernandes, Renata Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Renata Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Petições
Conselho Ultramarino
Império Português
Provisões
topic Petições
Conselho Ultramarino
Império Português
Provisões
description This article intends to examine the petitionary mechanism as a particular modality of political communication between the Portuguese overseas vassals and the monarch, from his Overseas Council. My goal is to scrutinize the various uses of petitions and their framing in the governmental logic of colonization as a broad, multifaceted, and dynamic institutional channel of relationship between subjects and the royal power based in Lisbon. Considering the analytical potential of the reconstitution of the petition–form of processing–response circuit, part of the corpus housed in the Overseas Historical Archive, I propose to compare both the petitionary documents themselves, in the form of the Single Documents, and the decision-making circuits embodied in the registry books of the institution (Codices). At first, I make a discursive-formal analysis of the petitions. Then, I discuss the legal-institutional dynamics of treatment and response to the parties’ petitions, based on the Overseas Council’s Provisions Record Books. The main hypothesis defended is that the petitions and their procedures and responses point to governance practices, submission models and forms of control not always made explicit by historiography or seen as merely protocol. They are, however, very important sources of the institutional practices of the organizational complex of the Portuguese region in its relations with colonial societies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805
10.1590/2236-463334ed00123
url https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/2236-463334ed00123
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/alm/article/view/14805/11108
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Renata Silva Fernandes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Almanack; No. 34 (2023)
Almanack; Núm. 34 (2023)
Almanack; n. 34 (2023)
2236-4633
reponame:Almanack (Guarulhos)
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Almanack (Guarulhos)
collection Almanack (Guarulhos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Almanack (Guarulhos) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv almanack@unifesp.br||andremachados@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1800217299296190464