Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14263 |
Resumo: | Artificial intelligence has been used in the Brazilian Judiciary, especially in the face of normative acts of the National Council of Justice, however there is no regulation of the subject in the legislative scope. Considering the urgency of a regulatory framework, the present study aims to discuss the issue of artificial intelligence regulation in the Judiciary, especially what are the limits and possibilities related to the use of AI by the Judiciary, with emphasis on the judicial decision. Therefore, from the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and the historical and comparative procedure methods, a comparative law study is carried out between the normative structures under construction in the European Union and in Brazil. It is concluded that the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence of the European Union, which is awaiting approval by the European Parliament, presents important norms, especially regarding ethical and security issues to be observed by AI systems, which deserve to be observed by Brazil at a global level legislative. |
id |
UNIFOR-3_086a4819c20c99e91034b9696da95343 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/14263 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFOR-3 |
network_name_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciaryRegulação da Inteligência Artifical no Judiciário Brasileiro e EuropeuInteligência artificial Conselho Nacional de Justiçadecisão judicialpoder judiciário Artificial IntelligenceNational Council of Justice judicial decisionJudicial PowerregulationArtificial intelligence has been used in the Brazilian Judiciary, especially in the face of normative acts of the National Council of Justice, however there is no regulation of the subject in the legislative scope. Considering the urgency of a regulatory framework, the present study aims to discuss the issue of artificial intelligence regulation in the Judiciary, especially what are the limits and possibilities related to the use of AI by the Judiciary, with emphasis on the judicial decision. Therefore, from the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and the historical and comparative procedure methods, a comparative law study is carried out between the normative structures under construction in the European Union and in Brazil. It is concluded that the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence of the European Union, which is awaiting approval by the European Parliament, presents important norms, especially regarding ethical and security issues to be observed by AI systems, which deserve to be observed by Brazil at a global level legislative.A inteligência artificial tem sido utilizada no Poder Judiciário brasileiro, sobretudo diante de atos normativos do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, todavia inexiste regulamentação da temática no âmbito legislativo. Tendo em vista a urgência de um marco-regulatório, o presente estudo visa discutir o tema da regulação da inteligência artificial no Judiciário, especialmente quais são os limites e as possibilidades relacionadas à utilização da IA pelo Judiciário, com ênfase na decisão judicial. Para tanto, a partir da abordagem fenomenológico-hermenêutica e dos métodos de procedimento histórico e comparativo realiza-se um estudo de direito comparado entre as estruturas normativas em construção no âmbito da União Europeia e no Brasil. Conclui-se que a Proposta de Regulamento de Inteligência Artificial da União Europeia, que aguarda aprovação do Parlamento Europeu, apresenta normas importantes, especialmente quanto às questões éticas e de segurança a serem observadas pelos sistemas de IA, que merecem ser observadas pelo Brasil em nível legislativo.Universidade de Fortaleza2023-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/1426310.5020/2317-2150.2023.14263Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2023)Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 28 Núm. 4 (2023)Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 28 n. 4 (2023)2317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14263/7119Copyright (c) 2023 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHoch, Patrícia AdrianiEngelmann, Wilson2024-02-27T12:14:44Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/14263Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/rpenhttp://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2024-02-27T12:14:44Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary Regulação da Inteligência Artifical no Judiciário Brasileiro e Europeu |
title |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
spellingShingle |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary Hoch, Patrícia Adriani Inteligência artificial Conselho Nacional de Justiça decisão judicial poder judiciário Artificial Intelligence National Council of Justice judicial decision Judicial Power regulation |
title_short |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
title_full |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
title_fullStr |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
title_sort |
Regulation of artificial intelligence in the brazilian and european judiciary |
author |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani |
author_facet |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani Engelmann, Wilson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Engelmann, Wilson |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani Engelmann, Wilson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Inteligência artificial Conselho Nacional de Justiça decisão judicial poder judiciário Artificial Intelligence National Council of Justice judicial decision Judicial Power regulation |
topic |
Inteligência artificial Conselho Nacional de Justiça decisão judicial poder judiciário Artificial Intelligence National Council of Justice judicial decision Judicial Power regulation |
description |
Artificial intelligence has been used in the Brazilian Judiciary, especially in the face of normative acts of the National Council of Justice, however there is no regulation of the subject in the legislative scope. Considering the urgency of a regulatory framework, the present study aims to discuss the issue of artificial intelligence regulation in the Judiciary, especially what are the limits and possibilities related to the use of AI by the Judiciary, with emphasis on the judicial decision. Therefore, from the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and the historical and comparative procedure methods, a comparative law study is carried out between the normative structures under construction in the European Union and in Brazil. It is concluded that the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence of the European Union, which is awaiting approval by the European Parliament, presents important norms, especially regarding ethical and security issues to be observed by AI systems, which deserve to be observed by Brazil at a global level legislative. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14263 10.5020/2317-2150.2023.14263 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14263 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2317-2150.2023.14263 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14263/7119 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2023) Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 28 Núm. 4 (2023) Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 28 n. 4 (2023) 2317-2150 1519-8464 reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) instacron:UNIFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
instacron_str |
UNIFOR |
institution |
UNIFOR |
reponame_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
collection |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistapensar@unifor.br |
_version_ |
1800217257139240960 |