The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method. |
id |
UNIJ-1_6116f6bb8ac92fac108f0c79160cf0b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13607 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal CourtO Teste da Proporcionalidade no Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e no Supremo Tribunal FederalTeste da proporcionalidadeAplicabilidadeDireito comparadoJurisprudênciaTribunal Constitucional PeruanoProportionalityAplicabilityComparative LawJurisprudencePeruvian Constitutional CourtThe purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method. A presente investigação tem por finalidade examinar a aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade pelo Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. A questão a ser respondida é a seguinte: Como o Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e o Supremo Tribunal Federal aplicam o teste da proporcionalidade? O teste da proporcionalidade é uma ferramenta central da jurisdição do Estado de direito constitucional democrático. Em uma constituição com catálogo de direitos fundamentais somente são admitidas restrições justificadas com base no teste da proporcionalidade. O problema da aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade é central, justificando-se examinar como os tribunais constitucionais empregam essa ferramenta metodológica. A análise de decisões do Tribunal Constitucional do Peru mostra a aplicação do modelo standard, amplamente difundido, configurado nos subtestes da legitimidade do fim, da adequação, da necessidade e proporcionalidade em sentido estrito. A análise de decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal evidencia a prevalência de aplicação indistinta e não rigorosa de uma ideia geral e ampla de proporcionalidade, mais como um topoi retórico-argumentativo, identificada com razoabilidade ou ponderação. Em algumas decisões, pode ser rastreada a aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade na configuração do modelo standard. Comparativamente, as decisões do Tribunal Constitucional do Peru são superiores às do Supremo Tribunal Federal em relação à qualidade da fundamentação da aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade. A pesquisa é bibliográfica, com análise de casos comparativa, e o método é o hipotético-dedutivo. EDITORA UNIJUI2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1360710.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e136072317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607/7627Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGavião Filho, Anizio Pires Guidolin, Renata Vielmo2023-10-10T11:18:32Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13607Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2023-10-10T11:18:32Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court O Teste da Proporcionalidade no Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e no Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
spellingShingle |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires Teste da proporcionalidade Aplicabilidade Direito comparado Jurisprudência Tribunal Constitucional Peruano Proportionality Aplicability Comparative Law Jurisprudence Peruvian Constitutional Court |
title_short |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
title_full |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
title_fullStr |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
title_sort |
The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court |
author |
Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires |
author_facet |
Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires Guidolin, Renata Vielmo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guidolin, Renata Vielmo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires Guidolin, Renata Vielmo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teste da proporcionalidade Aplicabilidade Direito comparado Jurisprudência Tribunal Constitucional Peruano Proportionality Aplicability Comparative Law Jurisprudence Peruvian Constitutional Court |
topic |
Teste da proporcionalidade Aplicabilidade Direito comparado Jurisprudência Tribunal Constitucional Peruano Proportionality Aplicability Comparative Law Jurisprudence Peruvian Constitutional Court |
description |
The purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607 10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607 |
url |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607/7627 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e13607 2317-5389 reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) instacron:UNIJUI |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
instacron_str |
UNIJUI |
institution |
UNIJUI |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845054795579392 |