The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle Maia
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11000
Resumo: This article analyzes the parliamentary debate on the new National Drug Policy (Law No. 13,840 / 19) in the Chamber of Deputies. The objective is to identify the discursive formations on which such discourses are based, correlating them with visions guided by biopolitics. The research problem is expressed by the following question: what are the predominant ideologies in the parliamentary debate about the production, commercialization and consumption of psychoactive substances? The hypothesis that guides the study consists of the premise that parliamentarians have progressively adopted a sanitary discourse, treating users as sick individuals who need state protection to take care of their health, through compulsory hospitalization. In order to carry out the research, we analyzed the shorthand notes of the debates during the vote on the matter at the Plenary of the Chamber of Deputies, totaling 70 pronouncements. The conclusions confirm the hypothesis, with the predominance of health discourse formation. In addition, the following were identified: a punitivist discursive formation, which advocates more rigor in punishing traffickers; a libertarian discursive formation, identified in few statements, which is based on respect for free will, without State interference in the individual's private life.
id UNIJ-1_919fed4d0d732695e52bd01d90981f94
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/11000
network_acronym_str UNIJ-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formationsO debate parlamentar sobre a nova política de drogas na Câmara dos Deputados: formações discursivas e biopolíticasPoder Legislativo. Discurso Político. Análise de Discurso. Política de Drogas.Brazilian Legislature. Political speech. Discourse Analysis. Drug Policy.This article analyzes the parliamentary debate on the new National Drug Policy (Law No. 13,840 / 19) in the Chamber of Deputies. The objective is to identify the discursive formations on which such discourses are based, correlating them with visions guided by biopolitics. The research problem is expressed by the following question: what are the predominant ideologies in the parliamentary debate about the production, commercialization and consumption of psychoactive substances? The hypothesis that guides the study consists of the premise that parliamentarians have progressively adopted a sanitary discourse, treating users as sick individuals who need state protection to take care of their health, through compulsory hospitalization. In order to carry out the research, we analyzed the shorthand notes of the debates during the vote on the matter at the Plenary of the Chamber of Deputies, totaling 70 pronouncements. The conclusions confirm the hypothesis, with the predominance of health discourse formation. In addition, the following were identified: a punitivist discursive formation, which advocates more rigor in punishing traffickers; a libertarian discursive formation, identified in few statements, which is based on respect for free will, without State interference in the individual's private life.O artigo analisa o debate parlamentar sobre a nova Política Nacional de Drogas (Lei nº 13.840/19) na Câmara dos Deputados. O objetivo é identificar as formações discursivas nas quais se baseiam tais discursos, correlacionando-as com visões orientadas por biopolíticas. O problema de pesquisa é expresso pela seguinte questão: quais são as ideologias preponderantes no debate parlamentar acerca da produção, comercialização e consumo de substâncias psicoativas? A hipótese que guia o estudo consiste na premissa de que os parlamentares têm, progressivamente, adotado um discurso sanitarista, tratando os usuários como indivíduos doentes que necessitam da tutela estatal para cuidar de sua saúde, mediante internação compulsória. Para a realização da pesquisa analisamos as notas taquigráficas dos debates durante a votação da matéria no Plenário da Câmara dos Deputados, totalizando 70 pronunciamentos. As conclusões confirmam a hipótese, com o predomínio da formação discursiva sanitarista. Além disso, foram identificadas: uma formação discursiva punitivista, que defende mais rigor na punição dos traficantes; uma formação discursiva libertária, identificada em poucos pronunciamentos, que se baseia no respeito ao livre-arbítrio, sem interferência do Estado na vida privada do indivíduo.EDITORA UNIJUI2022-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1100010.21527/2317-5389.2022.19.11000Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 10 n. 19 (2022): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e110002317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11000/7040Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle MaiaBarros, Antonio Teixeira de2022-07-04T13:36:09Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/11000Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2022-07-04T13:36:09Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
O debate parlamentar sobre a nova política de drogas na Câmara dos Deputados: formações discursivas e biopolíticas
title The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
spellingShingle The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
Cerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle Maia
Poder Legislativo. Discurso Político. Análise de Discurso. Política de Drogas.
Brazilian Legislature. Political speech. Discourse Analysis. Drug Policy.
title_short The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
title_full The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
title_fullStr The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
title_full_unstemmed The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
title_sort The parliamentary debate on the new drug policy in the Chamber of Deputies: discursive and biopolitical formations
author Cerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle Maia
author_facet Cerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle Maia
Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
author_role author
author2 Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cerqueira, Wanessa Gabrielle Maia
Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Poder Legislativo. Discurso Político. Análise de Discurso. Política de Drogas.
Brazilian Legislature. Political speech. Discourse Analysis. Drug Policy.
topic Poder Legislativo. Discurso Político. Análise de Discurso. Política de Drogas.
Brazilian Legislature. Political speech. Discourse Analysis. Drug Policy.
description This article analyzes the parliamentary debate on the new National Drug Policy (Law No. 13,840 / 19) in the Chamber of Deputies. The objective is to identify the discursive formations on which such discourses are based, correlating them with visions guided by biopolitics. The research problem is expressed by the following question: what are the predominant ideologies in the parliamentary debate about the production, commercialization and consumption of psychoactive substances? The hypothesis that guides the study consists of the premise that parliamentarians have progressively adopted a sanitary discourse, treating users as sick individuals who need state protection to take care of their health, through compulsory hospitalization. In order to carry out the research, we analyzed the shorthand notes of the debates during the vote on the matter at the Plenary of the Chamber of Deputies, totaling 70 pronouncements. The conclusions confirm the hypothesis, with the predominance of health discourse formation. In addition, the following were identified: a punitivist discursive formation, which advocates more rigor in punishing traffickers; a libertarian discursive formation, identified in few statements, which is based on respect for free will, without State interference in the individual's private life.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11000
10.21527/2317-5389.2022.19.11000
url https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11000
identifier_str_mv 10.21527/2317-5389.2022.19.11000
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11000/7040
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 10 n. 19 (2022): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e11000
2317-5389
reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron:UNIJUI
instname_str Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron_str UNIJUI
institution UNIJUI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845057491468288