Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Mouseion (Canoas) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/4710 |
Resumo: | The “Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife” (PAG) convened in 2010 an international ideas contest to run the “Atrio de la Alhambra”. The project presented on second round by the architects Alvaro Siza Vieira and Juan Domingo Santos was the winner but today, almost 8 years later, it has not been executed. The context of this impasse is an open controversy in which civil organizations, patrimonialists, professional colleges, the PAG itself and even ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites / UNESCO) have intervened.The following work aims to historicize the mismatches that the Atrium project claim to solve, through the different configurations assumed in the Plan Director 2007-2020 as the 2010 international contest, replacing some of the most reliable arguments that result in the controversy and a contribution from an architectural and urbanistic component through the city-monument hypothesis as an indissoluble pair. |
id |
UNILASALLE-1_74be8256d0b9b19300e7deae93cae692 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/4710 |
network_acronym_str |
UNILASALLE-1 |
network_name_str |
Mouseion (Canoas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pairAtrio Alhambra: proceso de desarticulación del par ciudad-monumentoÁtrio Alhambra: processo de desarticulação do par cidade – monumentoCity-monumentMonumental Site of the Alhambra and the GeneralifeAtrium of the Alhambra and the GeneralifeCiudad-monumentoConjunto Monumental de la Alhambra y el GeneralifeAtrio de la Alhambra y el GeneralifeCidade-monumentoConjunto Monumental da Alhambra e do GeneralifeÁtrio da Alhambra e GeneralifeThe “Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife” (PAG) convened in 2010 an international ideas contest to run the “Atrio de la Alhambra”. The project presented on second round by the architects Alvaro Siza Vieira and Juan Domingo Santos was the winner but today, almost 8 years later, it has not been executed. The context of this impasse is an open controversy in which civil organizations, patrimonialists, professional colleges, the PAG itself and even ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites / UNESCO) have intervened.The following work aims to historicize the mismatches that the Atrium project claim to solve, through the different configurations assumed in the Plan Director 2007-2020 as the 2010 international contest, replacing some of the most reliable arguments that result in the controversy and a contribution from an architectural and urbanistic component through the city-monument hypothesis as an indissoluble pair.El Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife (PAG) convocó en 2010 a un concurso internacional de ideas para ejecutar el “atrio de la alhambra”. El proyecto presentado en segunda vuelta por los arquitectos Álvaro Siza Vieira y Juan Domingo Santos resultó ganador pero al día de hoy, casi 8 años más tarde, no se ha ejecutado. El marco de este impasse es una polémica abierta en la que han intervenido desde organizaciones civiles, patrimonialistas, colegiaturas profesionales, el propio PAG e inclusive el Consejo Internacional de Monumentos y Sitios/UNESCO - ICOMOS. El siguiente trabajo se propone historizar el problema que vendría a resolver el Atrio, a través de las distintas configuraciones que asume en el Plan Director 2007-2020 como las del concurso de 2010, reponiendo algunos de los argumentos más solventes que redundan la polémica y hacer un aporte desde una componente arquitectónica y urbanística a través de la hipótesis de ciudad-monumento como par indisoluble.O Patronato da Alhambra e Generalife (PAG) convocou em 2010 uma competição internacional de ideias para administrar o “átrio da Alhambra”. O projeto apresentado na segunda volta pelos arquitetos Álvaro Siza Vieira e Juan Domingo Santos foi o vencedor, mas até hoje, quase oito anos depois, não foi executado. No centro desse impasse está uma controvérsia aberta pela intervenção de organizações civis, patrimonialistas, faculdades profissionais, o próprio PAG e até mesmo o ICOMOS (Conselho Internacional de Monumentos e Locais / UNESCO). O presente trabalho visa historicizar o problema que viria a resolver o átrio, através das diferentes configurações assumidas no Plano Diretor 2007-2020, como as do concurso de 2010, substituindo alguns dos argumentos mais polêmicos que resultam na controvérsia e apresentar uma contribuição de um componente arquitetônico e urbanístico através da hipótese cidade-monumento como um par indissolúvel.Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas2018-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/471010.18316/mouseion.v0i29.4710Mouseion; No. 29 (2018); p. 161-175Revista Mouseion; n. 29 (2018); p. 161-1751981-7207reponame:Mouseion (Canoas)instname:Centro Universitário La Salle (Unilasalle)instacron:UNILASALLEspahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/4710/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Mouseioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCambon, Nicolás2022-05-23T17:40:47Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/4710Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseionhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/oai||revista.mouseion@unilasalle.edu.br1981-72071981-7207opendoar:2022-05-23T17:40:47Mouseion (Canoas) - Centro Universitário La Salle (Unilasalle)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair Atrio Alhambra: proceso de desarticulación del par ciudad-monumento Átrio Alhambra: processo de desarticulação do par cidade – monumento |
title |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
spellingShingle |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair Cambon, Nicolás City-monument Monumental Site of the Alhambra and the Generalife Atrium of the Alhambra and the Generalife Ciudad-monumento Conjunto Monumental de la Alhambra y el Generalife Atrio de la Alhambra y el Generalife Cidade-monumento Conjunto Monumental da Alhambra e do Generalife Átrio da Alhambra e Generalife |
title_short |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
title_full |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
title_fullStr |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
title_full_unstemmed |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
title_sort |
Atrio Alhambra: dismantling process of the city-monument pair |
author |
Cambon, Nicolás |
author_facet |
Cambon, Nicolás |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cambon, Nicolás |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
City-monument Monumental Site of the Alhambra and the Generalife Atrium of the Alhambra and the Generalife Ciudad-monumento Conjunto Monumental de la Alhambra y el Generalife Atrio de la Alhambra y el Generalife Cidade-monumento Conjunto Monumental da Alhambra e do Generalife Átrio da Alhambra e Generalife |
topic |
City-monument Monumental Site of the Alhambra and the Generalife Atrium of the Alhambra and the Generalife Ciudad-monumento Conjunto Monumental de la Alhambra y el Generalife Atrio de la Alhambra y el Generalife Cidade-monumento Conjunto Monumental da Alhambra e do Generalife Átrio da Alhambra e Generalife |
description |
The “Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife” (PAG) convened in 2010 an international ideas contest to run the “Atrio de la Alhambra”. The project presented on second round by the architects Alvaro Siza Vieira and Juan Domingo Santos was the winner but today, almost 8 years later, it has not been executed. The context of this impasse is an open controversy in which civil organizations, patrimonialists, professional colleges, the PAG itself and even ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites / UNESCO) have intervened.The following work aims to historicize the mismatches that the Atrium project claim to solve, through the different configurations assumed in the Plan Director 2007-2020 as the 2010 international contest, replacing some of the most reliable arguments that result in the controversy and a contribution from an architectural and urbanistic component through the city-monument hypothesis as an indissoluble pair. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/4710 10.18316/mouseion.v0i29.4710 |
url |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/4710 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18316/mouseion.v0i29.4710 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Mouseion/article/view/4710/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Mouseion info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Mouseion |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Mouseion; No. 29 (2018); p. 161-175 Revista Mouseion; n. 29 (2018); p. 161-175 1981-7207 reponame:Mouseion (Canoas) instname:Centro Universitário La Salle (Unilasalle) instacron:UNILASALLE |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário La Salle (Unilasalle) |
instacron_str |
UNILASALLE |
institution |
UNILASALLE |
reponame_str |
Mouseion (Canoas) |
collection |
Mouseion (Canoas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mouseion (Canoas) - Centro Universitário La Salle (Unilasalle) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.mouseion@unilasalle.edu.br |
_version_ |
1800218181234589696 |