Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Valeska Dayanne Pinto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/5162
Resumo: The article, through a bibliographical research of qualitative approach, proposes to analyze dissonant conceptions of democracy. On the one hand, the pragmatic institutional arrangement, which builds a model of democracy based on the conceptualization proposed by Joseph Schumpeter, according to which democracy is a method for making political decisions. Incorporating traces of this model, Richard Posner converges to a political notion with no intrinsic value, being only a device for the choice of rulers. On the other hand, a democratic and substantial structure, which proposes to protect individual rights, guarantee freedom, equality and dignity. In this substantial model, an authentic debate and a co-participatory conception are indispensable to the notion of democracy. Against this counterpoint, it is questioned: witch the democracy model more viable to realization of rights and dignity? To answer this problematic, this research proposes to investigate how minority rights may be embedded in the majority logic and to examine the reason for which the elitist struct is not enough to comprehend the complexity of democratic life. This is an important study, considering that democracy is a political regime widely used in the world, however has recently been put in check in certain countries, especially when, under the mantle of majority will, minority rights are reduced. In this scenario, the difficulty of pragmatic democracy is in the absence of value aspects, in a way not to consider equally all the individuals included in the democratic pact. Thus, it is concluded that the most viable model is one that is not limited to majoritarian procedures.
id UNILASALLE-4_4b1982e864bdd08f6134e1efd1022c49
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/5162
network_acronym_str UNILASALLE-4
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
repository_id_str
spelling Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald DworkinDemocracia pragmática vis à vis democracia substancial: um diálogo entre Richard Posner e Ronald DworkinDemocracy; Pragmatism; Method; Human Dignity; Individual Rights.Filosofia do Direito, Teoria PolíticaDemocracia; Pragmatismo; Método; Dignidade Humana; Direitos Individuais.The article, through a bibliographical research of qualitative approach, proposes to analyze dissonant conceptions of democracy. On the one hand, the pragmatic institutional arrangement, which builds a model of democracy based on the conceptualization proposed by Joseph Schumpeter, according to which democracy is a method for making political decisions. Incorporating traces of this model, Richard Posner converges to a political notion with no intrinsic value, being only a device for the choice of rulers. On the other hand, a democratic and substantial structure, which proposes to protect individual rights, guarantee freedom, equality and dignity. In this substantial model, an authentic debate and a co-participatory conception are indispensable to the notion of democracy. Against this counterpoint, it is questioned: witch the democracy model more viable to realization of rights and dignity? To answer this problematic, this research proposes to investigate how minority rights may be embedded in the majority logic and to examine the reason for which the elitist struct is not enough to comprehend the complexity of democratic life. This is an important study, considering that democracy is a political regime widely used in the world, however has recently been put in check in certain countries, especially when, under the mantle of majority will, minority rights are reduced. In this scenario, the difficulty of pragmatic democracy is in the absence of value aspects, in a way not to consider equally all the individuals included in the democratic pact. Thus, it is concluded that the most viable model is one that is not limited to majoritarian procedures.O artigo, por intermédio de pesquisa bibliográfica de abordagem qualitativa, propõe-se a analisar concepções dissonantes de democracia. Por um lado, o arranjo institucional pragmático, que constrói um modelo de democracia baseado na conceituação proposta por Joseph Schumpeter, segundo a qual a democracia é um método para tomada de decisões políticas. Incorporando traços desse modelo, Richard Posner converge para uma noção política sem valor intrínseco, tratando-se somente de um engenho para escolha de governantes. De outro, uma estrutura democrática e substancial, que propõe-se à proteção de direitos individuais, garantia de liberdade, igualdade e dignidade. Neste modelo substancial, um debate autêntico e uma concepção coparticipativa são indispensáveis à noção de democracia.LaSalle University - Unilasalle CanoasVerbicaro, Loiane PradoFerreira, Valeska Dayanne Pinto2019-02-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/516210.18316/redes.v7i1.5162Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 7, n. 1 (2019); p. 115-137Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 7, n. 1 (2019); p. 115-1372318-8081reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDESinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/5162/pdfDireitos autorais 2019 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-07T12:07:48Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/5162Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/indexhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br2318-80812318-8081opendoar:2022-03-07T12:07:48Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
Democracia pragmática vis à vis democracia substancial: um diálogo entre Richard Posner e Ronald Dworkin
title Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
spellingShingle Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Democracy; Pragmatism; Method; Human Dignity; Individual Rights.
Filosofia do Direito, Teoria Política
Democracia; Pragmatismo; Método; Dignidade Humana; Direitos Individuais.
title_short Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
title_full Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
title_fullStr Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
title_sort Pragmatic democracy vis to vis substantial democracy: a dialogue between Richard Posner and Ronald Dworkin
author Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
author_facet Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Ferreira, Valeska Dayanne Pinto
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Valeska Dayanne Pinto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Verbicaro, Loiane Prado
Ferreira, Valeska Dayanne Pinto
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy; Pragmatism; Method; Human Dignity; Individual Rights.
Filosofia do Direito, Teoria Política
Democracia; Pragmatismo; Método; Dignidade Humana; Direitos Individuais.
topic Democracy; Pragmatism; Method; Human Dignity; Individual Rights.
Filosofia do Direito, Teoria Política
Democracia; Pragmatismo; Método; Dignidade Humana; Direitos Individuais.
description The article, through a bibliographical research of qualitative approach, proposes to analyze dissonant conceptions of democracy. On the one hand, the pragmatic institutional arrangement, which builds a model of democracy based on the conceptualization proposed by Joseph Schumpeter, according to which democracy is a method for making political decisions. Incorporating traces of this model, Richard Posner converges to a political notion with no intrinsic value, being only a device for the choice of rulers. On the other hand, a democratic and substantial structure, which proposes to protect individual rights, guarantee freedom, equality and dignity. In this substantial model, an authentic debate and a co-participatory conception are indispensable to the notion of democracy. Against this counterpoint, it is questioned: witch the democracy model more viable to realization of rights and dignity? To answer this problematic, this research proposes to investigate how minority rights may be embedded in the majority logic and to examine the reason for which the elitist struct is not enough to comprehend the complexity of democratic life. This is an important study, considering that democracy is a political regime widely used in the world, however has recently been put in check in certain countries, especially when, under the mantle of majority will, minority rights are reduced. In this scenario, the difficulty of pragmatic democracy is in the absence of value aspects, in a way not to consider equally all the individuals included in the democratic pact. Thus, it is concluded that the most viable model is one that is not limited to majoritarian procedures.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/5162
10.18316/redes.v7i1.5162
url https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/5162
identifier_str_mv 10.18316/redes.v7i1.5162
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/5162/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 7, n. 1 (2019); p. 115-137
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 7, n. 1 (2019); p. 115-137
2318-8081
reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
instacron:UNILASALLE
instname_str Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
instacron_str UNILASALLE
institution UNILASALLE
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
collection Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br
_version_ 1788165953127710720