The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/961 |
Resumo: | The contemporary criminal policy evidences the predilection for a new way of criminality with which the penal process is not prepared yet to deal with. The corporate crimes reflect a large segment of this contemporary criminal law, in which there is a need to criminalize individuals for any actions taken on behalf of legal identities. If on one hand the principle of culpability requires clear and detailed definition by whom and how he/she committed the offense, in order to enable their full defense, on the other hand the rigor would end by contributing for the impunity of business leaders. This article investigated the relationship of criminal procedural principles of constitutional dignity in face of mechanisms created by forensic practice. It still attempted to analyze how the jurisprudence of the Superior Courts is facing this issue. Whereas the divergence is established in the scope of case-by-case analysis, we sought to define criteria to limit the accusatory actuation in this kind of crimes. |
id |
UNILASALLE-4_73b968dd9cbc0d3e9d1d2dd6c9adbf6f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/961 |
network_acronym_str |
UNILASALLE-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal processA denúncia genérica nos delitos societários como óbice à concretização de um processo penal democráticofull defense; generic denouncement; penal processDireito; Processo PenalDefesa; Denúncia; Processo PenalThe contemporary criminal policy evidences the predilection for a new way of criminality with which the penal process is not prepared yet to deal with. The corporate crimes reflect a large segment of this contemporary criminal law, in which there is a need to criminalize individuals for any actions taken on behalf of legal identities. If on one hand the principle of culpability requires clear and detailed definition by whom and how he/she committed the offense, in order to enable their full defense, on the other hand the rigor would end by contributing for the impunity of business leaders. This article investigated the relationship of criminal procedural principles of constitutional dignity in face of mechanisms created by forensic practice. It still attempted to analyze how the jurisprudence of the Superior Courts is facing this issue. Whereas the divergence is established in the scope of case-by-case analysis, we sought to define criteria to limit the accusatory actuation in this kind of crimes.A política criminal contemporânea evidencia a predileção por uma nova forma de criminalidade, com a qual o processo penal ainda não está preparado a lidar. Os crimes societários refletem um grande segmento desse direito penal contemporâneo, em que há a necessidade de se criminalizar pessoas físicas por ações tomadas em nome de pessoas jurídicas. Se de um lado o princípio da culpabilidade exige definição clara e minuciosa de quem e como cometeu o delito, de forma a viabilizar sua ampla defesa, por outro o rigor acabaria contribuindo para a impunidade empresarial. O presente artigo investigou a relação de princípios processuais penais de dignidade constitucional frente a mecanismos criados pela prática forense. Ainda buscou analisar como a jurisprudência dos Tribunais Superiores vêm enfrentando a matéria. Considerando que a divergência se estabelece no âmbito da análise casuística, buscou-se definir critérios para limitar a atuação acusatória em crimes dessa natureza.LaSalle University - Unilasalle CanoasMenezes, Bruno SeligmanPauli, Cristiane Penning2013-11-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/96110.18316/961Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 1, n. 1 (2013); p. 25-47Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 1, n. 1 (2013); p. 25-472318-8081reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDESinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/961/936info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-24T14:22:18Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/961Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/indexhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br2318-80812318-8081opendoar:2017-05-24T14:22:18Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process A denúncia genérica nos delitos societários como óbice à concretização de um processo penal democrático |
title |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
spellingShingle |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process Menezes, Bruno Seligman full defense; generic denouncement; penal process Direito; Processo Penal Defesa; Denúncia; Processo Penal |
title_short |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
title_full |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
title_fullStr |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
title_full_unstemmed |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
title_sort |
The generic denouncement in the corporate offenses as obstacle to the concretization of democratic penal process |
author |
Menezes, Bruno Seligman |
author_facet |
Menezes, Bruno Seligman Pauli, Cristiane Penning |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pauli, Cristiane Penning |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Menezes, Bruno Seligman Pauli, Cristiane Penning |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
full defense; generic denouncement; penal process Direito; Processo Penal Defesa; Denúncia; Processo Penal |
topic |
full defense; generic denouncement; penal process Direito; Processo Penal Defesa; Denúncia; Processo Penal |
description |
The contemporary criminal policy evidences the predilection for a new way of criminality with which the penal process is not prepared yet to deal with. The corporate crimes reflect a large segment of this contemporary criminal law, in which there is a need to criminalize individuals for any actions taken on behalf of legal identities. If on one hand the principle of culpability requires clear and detailed definition by whom and how he/she committed the offense, in order to enable their full defense, on the other hand the rigor would end by contributing for the impunity of business leaders. This article investigated the relationship of criminal procedural principles of constitutional dignity in face of mechanisms created by forensic practice. It still attempted to analyze how the jurisprudence of the Superior Courts is facing this issue. Whereas the divergence is established in the scope of case-by-case analysis, we sought to define criteria to limit the accusatory actuation in this kind of crimes. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/961 10.18316/961 |
url |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/961 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18316/961 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/961/936 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 1, n. 1 (2013); p. 25-47 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 1, n. 1 (2013); p. 25-47 2318-8081 reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) instacron:UNILASALLE |
instname_str |
Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
instacron_str |
UNILASALLE |
institution |
UNILASALLE |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br |
_version_ |
1788165953114079232 |