The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Thesis Juris |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/13169 |
Resumo: | It is discussed the absence of the normative possibility of patenting a computer program in Brazil, along with the resulting effects of the shortage of an adequate protection to that immaterial work which cannot be compared to other artistic and literary works as it currently occurs in Brazilian legislation. Once the software itself does not have adequate protection, there is an incentive to plagiarism and counterfeiting. This submits the person of the originator of the computer program to risks and uncertainties of needing to draw upon common means to protecting their patrimony, without there being, however, guarantee of exclusivity and primacy over their intellectual work, which is the source code. By using the deductive method and the bibliographic research, the study proposes the necessity of updating the law, so that it will conform to, for example, countries with emphasis on entrepreneurship, such as the United States. The article concludes that it is not possible to achieve healthy entrepreneurship if, to people with an innovative and inventive eye, are not guaranteed by law, the exclusivity and primacy of their creation for a reasonable time lapse. |
id |
UNINOVE-2_088d03eb86a802e74d50a2feb866398f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/13169 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problemA impossibilidade normativa de patente de código fonte no Brasil e o problema do plágio de softwareIntellectual propertySoftware patentPlagiarismDireito de autorPatente de softwarePlágioIt is discussed the absence of the normative possibility of patenting a computer program in Brazil, along with the resulting effects of the shortage of an adequate protection to that immaterial work which cannot be compared to other artistic and literary works as it currently occurs in Brazilian legislation. Once the software itself does not have adequate protection, there is an incentive to plagiarism and counterfeiting. This submits the person of the originator of the computer program to risks and uncertainties of needing to draw upon common means to protecting their patrimony, without there being, however, guarantee of exclusivity and primacy over their intellectual work, which is the source code. By using the deductive method and the bibliographic research, the study proposes the necessity of updating the law, so that it will conform to, for example, countries with emphasis on entrepreneurship, such as the United States. The article concludes that it is not possible to achieve healthy entrepreneurship if, to people with an innovative and inventive eye, are not guaranteed by law, the exclusivity and primacy of their creation for a reasonable time lapse.Discute-se a ausência da possibilidade normativa de patente de programa de computador no Brasil e os efeitos decorrentes da falta de uma adequada proteção a tal obra imaterial que não pode ser comparada às demais obras artísticas e literárias, como atualmente ocorre na legislação brasileira. Como o software em si não é adequadamente protegido, há um incentivo ao plágio e contrafação. Isto submete a pessoa do originador do programa de computador a riscos e incertezas de ter que se valer dos meios comuns para proteção do seu patrimônio, sem que haja, contudo, garantia de exclusividade e primazia sobre sua obra intelectual, que é o código-fonte. Usando o método dedutivo e a pesquisa bibliográfica, propõe-se a necessidade de atualização da lei, para que esta se adeque, por exemplo, a países que possuem enfoque no empreendedorismo, tal como os Estados Unidos. Conclui o artigo que não é possível se alcançar um salutar empreendedorismo se às pessoas com olhar inovador e inventivo não forem asseguradas, pela lei, a exclusividade e primazia de sua criação por razoável lapso de tempo. Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2020-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1316910.5585/rtj.v9i1.13169Revista Thesis Juris; v. 9 n. 1 (2020): (jan./jun.); 29-522317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/13169/8265Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Jurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParchen, Charles EmmanuelFreitas, Cinthia Obladen de Almendra2020-06-23T22:57:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/13169Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2020-06-23T22:57:25Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem A impossibilidade normativa de patente de código fonte no Brasil e o problema do plágio de software |
title |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
spellingShingle |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem Parchen, Charles Emmanuel Intellectual property Software patent Plagiarism Direito de autor Patente de software Plágio |
title_short |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
title_full |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
title_fullStr |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
title_full_unstemmed |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
title_sort |
The normative impossibility of source code patent in Brazil and the software plagiarism problem |
author |
Parchen, Charles Emmanuel |
author_facet |
Parchen, Charles Emmanuel Freitas, Cinthia Obladen de Almendra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Cinthia Obladen de Almendra |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Parchen, Charles Emmanuel Freitas, Cinthia Obladen de Almendra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intellectual property Software patent Plagiarism Direito de autor Patente de software Plágio |
topic |
Intellectual property Software patent Plagiarism Direito de autor Patente de software Plágio |
description |
It is discussed the absence of the normative possibility of patenting a computer program in Brazil, along with the resulting effects of the shortage of an adequate protection to that immaterial work which cannot be compared to other artistic and literary works as it currently occurs in Brazilian legislation. Once the software itself does not have adequate protection, there is an incentive to plagiarism and counterfeiting. This submits the person of the originator of the computer program to risks and uncertainties of needing to draw upon common means to protecting their patrimony, without there being, however, guarantee of exclusivity and primacy over their intellectual work, which is the source code. By using the deductive method and the bibliographic research, the study proposes the necessity of updating the law, so that it will conform to, for example, countries with emphasis on entrepreneurship, such as the United States. The article concludes that it is not possible to achieve healthy entrepreneurship if, to people with an innovative and inventive eye, are not guaranteed by law, the exclusivity and primacy of their creation for a reasonable time lapse. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/13169 10.5585/rtj.v9i1.13169 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/13169 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/rtj.v9i1.13169 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/13169/8265 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris; v. 9 n. 1 (2020): (jan./jun.); 29-52 2317-3580 reponame:Revista Thesis Juris instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
collection |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
thesis@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1800218169302843392 |