Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Thesis Juris |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16904 |
Resumo: | The general objective of this research is to revisit the inquisitive-procedural nature of the public civil inquiry, proposing a procedural analysis of the respective institute through the mandatory observance of the contradictory principle, seen as a legal presupposition of the democratic legitimacy of the state provision. The objective justification for choosing the theme stems from its practical, theoretical and current relevance, especially since the evidence produced in the context of the public civil inquiry may be used in the filing of public civil action and in conducting the conduct adjustment term. Through bibliographic and documentary research, thematic, theoretical, interpretive and critical analyzes, it was concluded that the public civil inquiry is a model of a democratic collective process, with the observance of the adversary being mandatory to ensure the democratic legitimacy of the state provision. |
id |
UNINOVE-2_417490f0095cf4a98de92d12bcb9de1c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/16904 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardianContraditório no inquérito civil como modelo participativo de tutela coletivapublic civil inquirycontradictory principledemocratic collective processinquérito civil públicoprincípio do contraditórioprocesso coletivo democráticoThe general objective of this research is to revisit the inquisitive-procedural nature of the public civil inquiry, proposing a procedural analysis of the respective institute through the mandatory observance of the contradictory principle, seen as a legal presupposition of the democratic legitimacy of the state provision. The objective justification for choosing the theme stems from its practical, theoretical and current relevance, especially since the evidence produced in the context of the public civil inquiry may be used in the filing of public civil action and in conducting the conduct adjustment term. Through bibliographic and documentary research, thematic, theoretical, interpretive and critical analyzes, it was concluded that the public civil inquiry is a model of a democratic collective process, with the observance of the adversary being mandatory to ensure the democratic legitimacy of the state provision.O objetivo geral da presente pesquisa é revisitar a natureza inquisito-procedimental do inquérito civil público, propondo uma análise processual do respectivo instituto mediante a observância obrigatória do princípio do contraditório, visto como pressuposto jurídico da legitimidade democrática do provimento estatal. A justificativa objetiva da escolha do tema decorre de sua relevância prática, teórica e atual, especialmente porque as provas produzidas no âmbito do inquérito civil público poderão ser utilizadas na propositura da ação civil pública e na realização do termo de ajustamento de conduta. Por meio da pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, análises temáticas, teóricas, interpretativas e críticas, concluiu-se que o inquérito civil público é um modelo de processo coletivo democrático, sendo obrigatória a observância do contraditório para assegurar a legitimidade democrática do provimento estatal.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2021-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1690410.5585/rtj.v10i1.16904Revista Thesis Juris; v. 10 n. 1 (2021): (jan./jun.); 84-1142317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16904/8968Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Thesis Jurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Fabrício VeigaAlves, Davi de Paula2021-06-21T10:52:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/16904Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2021-06-21T10:52:45Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian Contraditório no inquérito civil como modelo participativo de tutela coletiva |
title |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
spellingShingle |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian Costa, Fabrício Veiga public civil inquiry contradictory principle democratic collective process inquérito civil público princípio do contraditório processo coletivo democrático |
title_short |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
title_full |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
title_fullStr |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
title_sort |
Contraditory in civil survey as participative model of collective guardian |
author |
Costa, Fabrício Veiga |
author_facet |
Costa, Fabrício Veiga Alves, Davi de Paula |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves, Davi de Paula |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Fabrício Veiga Alves, Davi de Paula |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
public civil inquiry contradictory principle democratic collective process inquérito civil público princípio do contraditório processo coletivo democrático |
topic |
public civil inquiry contradictory principle democratic collective process inquérito civil público princípio do contraditório processo coletivo democrático |
description |
The general objective of this research is to revisit the inquisitive-procedural nature of the public civil inquiry, proposing a procedural analysis of the respective institute through the mandatory observance of the contradictory principle, seen as a legal presupposition of the democratic legitimacy of the state provision. The objective justification for choosing the theme stems from its practical, theoretical and current relevance, especially since the evidence produced in the context of the public civil inquiry may be used in the filing of public civil action and in conducting the conduct adjustment term. Through bibliographic and documentary research, thematic, theoretical, interpretive and critical analyzes, it was concluded that the public civil inquiry is a model of a democratic collective process, with the observance of the adversary being mandatory to ensure the democratic legitimacy of the state provision. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16904 10.5585/rtj.v10i1.16904 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16904 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/rtj.v10i1.16904 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16904/8968 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris; v. 10 n. 1 (2021): (jan./jun.); 84-114 2317-3580 reponame:Revista Thesis Juris instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
collection |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
thesis@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1800218169596444672 |