Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
| Outros Autores: | , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng por |
| Título da fonte: | Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346 |
Resumo: | The democratization of discussions about urban planning and management is a relatively recent process. It is based on the articles 182 and 183 of the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution and Law 10,257/2001 (City Statute), which consolidated the Master Plans as a basic instrument of the developmental policy and urban expansion of municipalities and made popular participation mandatory during its design and implementation.Aim: To understand how the participatory experiences were during the Master Plans revision process in different Brazilian municipalities in consequence the obligatoriness established by Law 10.257/2001.Methodology: The methodologic procedure was a systematic review of academic researches (theses and dissertations) on Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations – BDTD, data collected from participatory proceeding, systematization, and analysis of the results.Results: The review identified: (1) the main characteristics of the researches in terms of their structure, area of knowledge, keywords, (2) the instruments of democratic management provided for the urban legislation and the respective participatory tools proposed by the Ministry of Cities and adopted by the evaluated municipalities, and (3) the main difficulties faced, as well as the advances and potentialities of including participation in urban planning and management.Discussion: This research found out that the adoption of the instruments of democratic management, as well as the participatory tools, for a large number of studied municipalities do not support establishing that the participatory processes were effective, as a consequence of events that weakened them. Nevertheless, advances and potentialities to be consolidated were detected. |
| id |
UNINOVE-3_de8ee72da472174909e08aac26b2b9d1 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/19346 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-3 |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic reviewExperiencias participativas en planificación y gestión urbana: una revisión sistemáticaExperiências participativas no planejamento e gestão urbana: uma revisão sistemáticaParticipation. Urban planning. Urban management. Masterplan. Brazilian municipalities.Participación. Planificación Urbana. Gestión Urbana. Plan de Ordenación Urbana. Municipios brasileños.Participação. Planejamento Urbano. Gestão Urbana. Plano Diretor. Municípios brasileiros.The democratization of discussions about urban planning and management is a relatively recent process. It is based on the articles 182 and 183 of the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution and Law 10,257/2001 (City Statute), which consolidated the Master Plans as a basic instrument of the developmental policy and urban expansion of municipalities and made popular participation mandatory during its design and implementation.Aim: To understand how the participatory experiences were during the Master Plans revision process in different Brazilian municipalities in consequence the obligatoriness established by Law 10.257/2001.Methodology: The methodologic procedure was a systematic review of academic researches (theses and dissertations) on Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations – BDTD, data collected from participatory proceeding, systematization, and analysis of the results.Results: The review identified: (1) the main characteristics of the researches in terms of their structure, area of knowledge, keywords, (2) the instruments of democratic management provided for the urban legislation and the respective participatory tools proposed by the Ministry of Cities and adopted by the evaluated municipalities, and (3) the main difficulties faced, as well as the advances and potentialities of including participation in urban planning and management.Discussion: This research found out that the adoption of the instruments of democratic management, as well as the participatory tools, for a large number of studied municipalities do not support establishing that the participatory processes were effective, as a consequence of events that weakened them. Nevertheless, advances and potentialities to be consolidated were detected.La democratización de las discusiones sobre planificación y gestión urbana es un proceso relativamente reciente y se basa en los artículos 182 y 183 de la Constitución Federal de 1988 y la Ley 10.257 / 2001 (Estatuto de la Ciudad), que consolidó los Planes Maestros como un instrumento básico de política de desarrollo y urbanismo. expansión de los municipios y obligó a la participación popular en su diseño e implementación.Objetivo: Entender cómo se produjeron las experiencias participativas en los procesos de revisión de los Planes Maestros de los diferentes municipios brasileños a través de la obligación establecida por la Ley 10.257/2001.Metodología: El procedimiento metodológico fue una revisión sistemática de los trabajos académicos (tesis y tesis) en la Biblioteca Digital Brasileña de Tesis y Disertaciones - BDTD, recopilación de datos relacionados con procesos participativos, sistematización y análisis de resultados.Resultados: La revisión permitió identificar: (1) las principales características de las investigaciones relativas a su estructura, área de conocimiento, palabras clave, (2) los instrumentos de gestión democrática previstos en la legislación urbana y los respectivos instrumentos participativos propuestos por el Ministerio de Ciudades y adoptados por los municipios evaluados, y (3) las principales dificultades a las que se enfrentan, así como los avances y potencialidades de la inclusión de la participación en la planificación urbana.Discusión: La investigación demostró que la adopción de los instrumentos de gestión democrática previstos en la legislación y los instrumentos participativos propuestos por el Ministerio de Ciudades por la mayoría de los municipios estudiados, no nos permite afirmar que los procesos participativos fueron efectivos, debido a situaciones que los debilitaron. Por otro lado, se identificaron los avances y potencialidades que debían consolidarse.A democratização das discussões acerca do planejamento e gestão urbana é um processo relativamente recente e está fundamentado nos artigos 182 e 183 da Constituição Federal de 1988 e na Lei 10.257/2001 (Estatuto da Cidade); consolidou os Planos Diretores como instrumento básico da política de desenvolvimento e expansão urbana dos municípios e tornou obrigatória a participação popular na sua elaboração e implementação.Objetivo: Compreender como ocorreram as experiências participativas nos processos de revisão de Planos Diretores de diferentes municípios brasileiros mediante a obrigatoriedade estabelecida pela Lei 10.257/2001.Metodologia: O procedimento metodológico: revisão sistemática de trabalhos acadêmicos (teses e dissertações) na Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações – BDTD, coleta de dados relativos aos processos participativos, sistematização e análise dos resultados.Resultados: A revisão permitiu identificar: (1) as principais características das pesquisas quanto sua estrutura, área de conhecimento e palavras-chaves; (2) os instrumentos de gestão democrática previstos na legislação urbanística e as respectivas ferramentas participativas propostas pelo Ministério das Cidades e adotados pelos municípios avaliados; (3) as principais dificuldades enfrentadas, bem como os avanços e as potencialidades da inclusão da participação no planejamento e gestão urbana.Discussão: A pesquisa demonstrou que a adoção dos instrumentos de gestão democrática e das ferramentas participativas, em grande parte dos Municípios estudados, não permite afirmar que os processos participativos foram efetivos em função das situações que os enfraqueceram. Por outro lado, foram identificados avanços e potencialidades a serem consolidados.Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE2021-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/1934610.5585/geas.v10i1.19346Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; v. 10 n. 1 (2021): Fluxo contínuo; e193462316-9834reponame:Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeASinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEengporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346/9154https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346/9155Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidadehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Maressa Correa PereiraFontes, Maria Solange Gurgel de CastroMagagnin, Renata Cardoso2021-12-22T15:29:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/19346Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/geasONGhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/oai||journalgeas@gmail.com2316-98342316-9834opendoar:2021-12-22T15:29Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review Experiencias participativas en planificación y gestión urbana: una revisión sistemática Experiências participativas no planejamento e gestão urbana: uma revisão sistemática |
| title |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| spellingShingle |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review Mendes, Maressa Correa Pereira Participation. Urban planning. Urban management. Masterplan. Brazilian municipalities. Participación. Planificación Urbana. Gestión Urbana. Plan de Ordenación Urbana. Municipios brasileños. Participação. Planejamento Urbano. Gestão Urbana. Plano Diretor. Municípios brasileiros. |
| title_short |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| title_full |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| title_sort |
Participatory experiences in urban planning and management: a systematic review |
| author |
Mendes, Maressa Correa Pereira |
| author_facet |
Mendes, Maressa Correa Pereira Fontes, Maria Solange Gurgel de Castro Magagnin, Renata Cardoso |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Fontes, Maria Solange Gurgel de Castro Magagnin, Renata Cardoso |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, Maressa Correa Pereira Fontes, Maria Solange Gurgel de Castro Magagnin, Renata Cardoso |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Participation. Urban planning. Urban management. Masterplan. Brazilian municipalities. Participación. Planificación Urbana. Gestión Urbana. Plan de Ordenación Urbana. Municipios brasileños. Participação. Planejamento Urbano. Gestão Urbana. Plano Diretor. Municípios brasileiros. |
| topic |
Participation. Urban planning. Urban management. Masterplan. Brazilian municipalities. Participación. Planificación Urbana. Gestión Urbana. Plan de Ordenación Urbana. Municipios brasileños. Participação. Planejamento Urbano. Gestão Urbana. Plano Diretor. Municípios brasileiros. |
| description |
The democratization of discussions about urban planning and management is a relatively recent process. It is based on the articles 182 and 183 of the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution and Law 10,257/2001 (City Statute), which consolidated the Master Plans as a basic instrument of the developmental policy and urban expansion of municipalities and made popular participation mandatory during its design and implementation.Aim: To understand how the participatory experiences were during the Master Plans revision process in different Brazilian municipalities in consequence the obligatoriness established by Law 10.257/2001.Methodology: The methodologic procedure was a systematic review of academic researches (theses and dissertations) on Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations – BDTD, data collected from participatory proceeding, systematization, and analysis of the results.Results: The review identified: (1) the main characteristics of the researches in terms of their structure, area of knowledge, keywords, (2) the instruments of democratic management provided for the urban legislation and the respective participatory tools proposed by the Ministry of Cities and adopted by the evaluated municipalities, and (3) the main difficulties faced, as well as the advances and potentialities of including participation in urban planning and management.Discussion: This research found out that the adoption of the instruments of democratic management, as well as the participatory tools, for a large number of studied municipalities do not support establishing that the participatory processes were effective, as a consequence of events that weakened them. Nevertheless, advances and potentialities to be consolidated were detected. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-14 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346 10.5585/geas.v10i1.19346 |
| url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/geas.v10i1.19346 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
| language |
eng por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346/9154 https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19346/9155 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; v. 10 n. 1 (2021): Fluxo contínuo; e19346 2316-9834 reponame:Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
| instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
| instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
| institution |
UNINOVE |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS |
| collection |
Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||journalgeas@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1800217234732220416 |