Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nardi, Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bulegon, Fabio, Barichello, Rodrigo, Silva, Givanildo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009
Resumo: The aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel.
id UNINOVE-4_0b646723cdc05c951848d618b07367a5
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/11009
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-4
network_name_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository_id_str
spelling Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusinessAnálise de importância e desempenho das ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos em agroindústriaProject Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix.maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetosThe aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel.O estudo tem por objetivo avaliar ferramentas que auxiliam as empresas no gerenciamento de projetos, verificando sua importância e desempenho pelo grau de utilização. A pesquisa se trata de survey case, realizada em uma agroindústria, que mantém rotinas de gerenciamento de projetos. A amostra é composta por gerentes de unidades e membros de suas equipes, que possuem ligação a gerenciamento de projetos. Para medir a confiabilidade das respostas utilizou-se Alfa de Cronbach e, a Correlação de Pearson para verificar as relações das variáveis. A Importance-Performance Matrix, de Slack (1994), foi utilizada para apontar as ferramentas que ficaram no quadrante “zona de urgência”, ou seja, com maior importância e menor desempenho. Os resultados indicam que houve significância nas variáveis aquisição com riscos e integração, comunicação com recursos humanos e conhecimento com integração. A pesquisa demonstra, pela ótica dos gestores, as ferramentas com menor e maior lacuna entre o grau de desempenho, por meio da utilização, e da importância mesmo que não seja utilizada na sua rotina de trabalho, entre os grupos de identificação. O método pode ser utilizado em empresas que gerenciam seus projetos por meio de ferramentas, identificando onde é necessário alocar maior e menor investimento em seus processos, seja em ferramentas ou em pessoal.Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)UnochapecóSingepProfissionais da empresa estudadaNardi, MarceloBulegon, FabioBarichello, RodrigoSilva, Givanildo2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/1100910.5585/gep.v10i1.11009Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 10, n. 1 (2019): janeiro-abril; 51-652236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009/6645Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-12T13:39:49Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/11009Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2019-09-12T13:39:49Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
Análise de importância e desempenho das ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos em agroindústria
title Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
spellingShingle Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
Nardi, Marcelo
Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix.
maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos
title_short Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
title_full Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
title_fullStr Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
title_full_unstemmed Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
title_sort Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
author Nardi, Marcelo
author_facet Nardi, Marcelo
Bulegon, Fabio
Barichello, Rodrigo
Silva, Givanildo
author_role author
author2 Bulegon, Fabio
Barichello, Rodrigo
Silva, Givanildo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
Unochapecó
Singep
Profissionais da empresa estudada

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nardi, Marcelo
Bulegon, Fabio
Barichello, Rodrigo
Silva, Givanildo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix.
maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos
topic Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix.
maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos
description The aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009
10.5585/gep.v10i1.11009
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/gep.v10i1.11009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009/6645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 10, n. 1 (2019): janeiro-abril; 51-65
2236-0972
reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
collection Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br
_version_ 1797052865173258240