Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009 |
Resumo: | The aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel. |
id |
UNINOVE-4_0b646723cdc05c951848d618b07367a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/11009 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusinessAnálise de importância e desempenho das ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos em agroindústriaProject Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix.maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetosThe aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel.O estudo tem por objetivo avaliar ferramentas que auxiliam as empresas no gerenciamento de projetos, verificando sua importância e desempenho pelo grau de utilização. A pesquisa se trata de survey case, realizada em uma agroindústria, que mantém rotinas de gerenciamento de projetos. A amostra é composta por gerentes de unidades e membros de suas equipes, que possuem ligação a gerenciamento de projetos. Para medir a confiabilidade das respostas utilizou-se Alfa de Cronbach e, a Correlação de Pearson para verificar as relações das variáveis. A Importance-Performance Matrix, de Slack (1994), foi utilizada para apontar as ferramentas que ficaram no quadrante “zona de urgência”, ou seja, com maior importância e menor desempenho. Os resultados indicam que houve significância nas variáveis aquisição com riscos e integração, comunicação com recursos humanos e conhecimento com integração. A pesquisa demonstra, pela ótica dos gestores, as ferramentas com menor e maior lacuna entre o grau de desempenho, por meio da utilização, e da importância mesmo que não seja utilizada na sua rotina de trabalho, entre os grupos de identificação. O método pode ser utilizado em empresas que gerenciam seus projetos por meio de ferramentas, identificando onde é necessário alocar maior e menor investimento em seus processos, seja em ferramentas ou em pessoal.Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)UnochapecóSingepProfissionais da empresa estudadaNardi, MarceloBulegon, FabioBarichello, RodrigoSilva, Givanildo2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/1100910.5585/gep.v10i1.11009Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 10, n. 1 (2019): janeiro-abril; 51-652236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009/6645Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-12T13:39:49Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/11009Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2019-09-12T13:39:49Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness Análise de importância e desempenho das ferramentas de gerenciamento de projetos em agroindústria |
title |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
spellingShingle |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness Nardi, Marcelo Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix. maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos |
title_short |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
title_full |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
title_fullStr |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
title_sort |
Importance-performance analysis of project management tools in agribusiness |
author |
Nardi, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Nardi, Marcelo Bulegon, Fabio Barichello, Rodrigo Silva, Givanildo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bulegon, Fabio Barichello, Rodrigo Silva, Givanildo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Unochapecó Singep Profissionais da empresa estudada |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nardi, Marcelo Bulegon, Fabio Barichello, Rodrigo Silva, Givanildo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix. maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos |
topic |
Project Management; Project management tools; Importance-Performance Matrix. maturidade em projetos; Processos e ciclo de vida em gestão de projetos |
description |
The aim of the study is to evaluate tools that help companies to manage projects, verifying their importance and performance by the degree of use. The research is a survey case, conducted in an agroindustry, which maintains project management routines. The sample is made up of unit managers and members of their teams, all of whom are connected to project management. To measure the reliability of the responses, we used the Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson’s Correlation to verify the relationships of the variables. The Slack (1994) Importance-Performance Matrix was used to indicate which tools were in the “urgency zone” quadrant, that is, with greater importance and lower performance. The results indicate that there was significance in the variables acquisition with risks is integration, communication with human resources knowledge with integration. The research shows managers the tools with the smallest and largest gap between the degree of performance, through the use, and the importance, even if not used in their work routine, between the identification groups. The method can be used in companies that manage their projects through tools, identifying where it is necessary to allocate more and less investment in their processes, be it in tools or in personnel. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009 10.5585/gep.v10i1.11009 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/gep.v10i1.11009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/11009/6645 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 Marcelo Nardi, Fabio Bulegon, Rodrigo Barichello, Givanildo Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 10, n. 1 (2019): janeiro-abril; 51-65 2236-0972 reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
collection |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1797052865173258240 |