Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcez, Marcos Paixão
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Maccari, Emerson Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9616
Resumo: Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive RD resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The RD projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in RD and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and RD evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to RD projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects - the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. 
id UNINOVE-4_913549ae0c09d46aad442526a881112b
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9616
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-4
network_name_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.Metodologia de Avaliação do Portfólio de Projetos de P&D pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco - um estudo de caso na Indústria Petroquímica.R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management;Avaliação de projetos de P&D; Gestão do portfolio de projetos. Gestão da Inovação; Valor presente ajustado ao risco; Gestão de ProjetoNowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive RD resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The RD projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in RD and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and RD evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to RD projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects - the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. Muita atenção tem sido reservada à avaliação de intangíveis, em especial em setores de alto conteúdo tecnológico, e, por conseguinte de elevadas alocações em projetos de PD, que por sua vez embutem alta incerteza. Os projetos de PD apresentam diferentes graus de inovação, embutindo distintos prazos de maturação, conteúdo tecnológico e níveis de incerteza. Novas pesquisas e práticas têm se concentrado em adaptar as metodologias tradicionais de avaliação para a tomada de decisão em gestão de portfólio e seleção de projetos nestes setores, especialmente o farmacêutico, biotecnológico e químico. Nesse sentido, a literatura contempla vários fatores de incerteza, tais como a complexidade da inovação, o estágio no ciclo de vida da tecnologia, grau de competências e domínio interno da tecnologia, risco e prazo de maturação. Realiza-se um aprofundamento nos campos de gestão tecnológica, finanças e análise da decisão e compara-se a teoria com os achados da prática empresarial em uma empresa de grande porte no setor petroquímico, com elevada alocação em PD e uso de metodologia específica de gestão do portfolio de projetos. Constata-se que as metodologias tradicionais de avaliação não respondem bem às elevadas incertezas dos projetos de inovação e necessitam ser ajustadas para uso, por meio de componentes de incerteza específicos - os direcionadores de risco, que afetam as probabilidades de sucesso técnico e comercial, e com isso se obtém um indicador mais robusto, o valor presente ajustado ao risco. Também parece prudente agrupar os projetos em diferentes categorias, selecionando os mais indicados segundo as métricas de avaliação de cada natureza, garantindo assim o alinhamento da estratégia tecnológica à corporativa.Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)Garcez, Marcos PaixãoMaccari, Emerson Antonio2015-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/961610.5585/gep.v6i2.351Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 01-152236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9616/4361Direitos autorais 2016 Marcos Paixão Garcez, Emerson Maccarihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-05-27T21:11:47Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9616Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2019-05-27T21:11:47Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
Metodologia de Avaliação do Portfólio de Projetos de P&D pelo valor presente ajustado ao risco - um estudo de caso na Indústria Petroquímica.
title Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
spellingShingle Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
Garcez, Marcos Paixão
R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management;
Avaliação de projetos de P&D; Gestão do portfolio de projetos. Gestão da Inovação; Valor presente ajustado ao risco; Gestão de Projeto
title_short Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
title_full Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
title_fullStr Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
title_sort Evaluation Methodology for the R&D Project Portfolio by Using the Risk Adjusted Net Present Value – One Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry.
author Garcez, Marcos Paixão
author_facet Garcez, Marcos Paixão
Maccari, Emerson Antonio
author_role author
author2 Maccari, Emerson Antonio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcez, Marcos Paixão
Maccari, Emerson Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management;
Avaliação de projetos de P&D; Gestão do portfolio de projetos. Gestão da Inovação; Valor presente ajustado ao risco; Gestão de Projeto
topic R&D project evaluation; Project Portfolio Management; Innovation Management;
Avaliação de projetos de P&D; Gestão do portfolio de projetos. Gestão da Inovação; Valor presente ajustado ao risco; Gestão de Projeto
description Nowadays dedicated attention is devoted to intangible evaluation aspects, especially in intensive technological sectors, which are characterized by expressive RD resources allocation and showing high uncertainties in the project development. The RD projects can present diverse inovativeness degrees, each one with different projects development terms, technological intensities and complexities, and related uncertainties degrees. So, the current research and practices are concentrated in the adjustment of the traditional evaluation methodologies for the decision making process related to the portfolio management in those sectors, mainly in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical industries. In this way, the literature presents some uncertainties factors, like the project complexity, the life cycle stage of the technology, the existence of internal knowledge and competencies regarding the technology, the risks involved and the project development terms. The study is based in one in-depth literature review in the technology management, financial methodologies and decision making theoretical streams, and evolves for one field case study carried out in one big petrochemical Brazilian company, which allocates expressive amounts of investments in RD and uses specific methodology for evaluating the portfolio of projects management. So, the study is organized in three sections: in the first, it aims to verify in the literature the existent methodologies for the project portfolio management. In the second, are presented the evaluation methodologies for innovation projects. Finally, in the third section, one empirical case study is performed in the Brazilian petrochemical leader, by using in-depth interviews and secondary data analyses, aiming to verify in the business practice the methodologies are being used for portfolio management and RD evaluation, and its observed limitations. Conclusions search similarities in the evaluation methodologies applied to the project portfolio management context, trying to establish recommendations for the company under investigation. As main findings, it is concluded that the traditional evaluation methodologies do not fit very well when applied to RD projects, which show high associated uncertainties, and need to be adjusted for use. This adjustment is made through specific uncertainty aspects - the risk drivers, which will influence the conditional probabilities of technical and market success, leading to one more robust aggregated indicator, the adjusted net present value. Beyond the use of this improved methodology, it seems to be worth value grouping the projects in different innovation categories, as preconized by the Strategic Buckets methodology, in order of comparing projects only pertaining for the same category, enabling so the adherence of the technology strategy to the business strategy. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9616
10.5585/gep.v6i2.351
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9616
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/gep.v6i2.351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9616/4361
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Marcos Paixão Garcez, Emerson Maccari
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Marcos Paixão Garcez, Emerson Maccari
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 01-15
2236-0972
reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
collection Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br
_version_ 1797052866159968256