A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira, José Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
Texto Completo: http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2045
Resumo: ABSTRACT The judicialization of politics has inspired several scientific researches due to its novelty and consequences, and formed the agenda of contemporary political science. In this context, this study sought to investigate the influence of popular participation in seven trials judged by the STF and TSE in the case "ficha limpa ( clean slate"): RO 1.069-RJ, by TSE (decided in 2006); ADPF 144-DF, by STF (decided in 2008); CC 1120-26.2010-DF, TSE (decided in 2010); RE s 630.147-DF, 631.102-PA e 633.703-MG, by STF (decided in 2010 and 2011); and joint trial of ADC s 29 and 30, and finally ADI 4578, tried by STF (decided in 2012). The concept of hard case developed by Ronald Dworkin and Robert Alexy, as the one whose solution is not expressed in the code of laws, was adopted and argued that in cases like that the judge commonly stands before more than one decision rationally justifiable. The seven trials were typified as hard cases. A concept of popular participation was built for the research purposes, which brought together normative contributions of theoretical approaches of participatory democracy, deliberative and radical. To perform such investigation, the votes published in the trials were rated into four categories, according to the presence or absence of the citizen participation reference, if they referred to it as an argument and for what purpose: to defend ficha limpa ( clean slate ) or the independence that the court expressed in relation to it. In spite of the public participation seen in these processes, especially in the year 2008 and the following, the Supreme Court and the TSE did not stage political decisions in the analyzed trials, since they had ratified policy decisions that have been already taken by the Legislature. On the other hand, reviews of the trials revealed some votes in whose speech grounds contain a reference to popular participation in the judgments accomplished in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The main influence has been seen in the last trial, the ADC's 29 and 30 and ADI 4578, decided by the Supreme Court, where the number of votes in favor of the thesis of ficha limpa ("clean slate") filled with arguments containing references to popular participation, was higher. In this trial, ministers who used to defend the independence of the court in relation to this influence began to justify their votes in favor of "clean slate" in popular participation. Others simply left out the speech which preached that the court should be free of such interference. Therefore, remains concluded that popular participation has affected the outcome of the hard case "ficha limpa ( clean slate".
id UNIOESTE-1_1c9ba174b8a5160b37584df0224f3896
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/2045
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
repository_id_str
spelling Alves, Gustavo Biasolihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7679869339058228Oliveira, Edmundo Alves dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4620256355323820Dombrowski, Osmirhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8604815798106584http://lattes.cnpq.br/1326898934291197Moreira, José Roberto2017-07-10T18:20:43Z2013-04-042012-09-12MOREIRA, José Roberto. A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF. 2012. 163 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2012.http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2045ABSTRACT The judicialization of politics has inspired several scientific researches due to its novelty and consequences, and formed the agenda of contemporary political science. In this context, this study sought to investigate the influence of popular participation in seven trials judged by the STF and TSE in the case "ficha limpa ( clean slate"): RO 1.069-RJ, by TSE (decided in 2006); ADPF 144-DF, by STF (decided in 2008); CC 1120-26.2010-DF, TSE (decided in 2010); RE s 630.147-DF, 631.102-PA e 633.703-MG, by STF (decided in 2010 and 2011); and joint trial of ADC s 29 and 30, and finally ADI 4578, tried by STF (decided in 2012). The concept of hard case developed by Ronald Dworkin and Robert Alexy, as the one whose solution is not expressed in the code of laws, was adopted and argued that in cases like that the judge commonly stands before more than one decision rationally justifiable. The seven trials were typified as hard cases. A concept of popular participation was built for the research purposes, which brought together normative contributions of theoretical approaches of participatory democracy, deliberative and radical. To perform such investigation, the votes published in the trials were rated into four categories, according to the presence or absence of the citizen participation reference, if they referred to it as an argument and for what purpose: to defend ficha limpa ( clean slate ) or the independence that the court expressed in relation to it. In spite of the public participation seen in these processes, especially in the year 2008 and the following, the Supreme Court and the TSE did not stage political decisions in the analyzed trials, since they had ratified policy decisions that have been already taken by the Legislature. On the other hand, reviews of the trials revealed some votes in whose speech grounds contain a reference to popular participation in the judgments accomplished in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The main influence has been seen in the last trial, the ADC's 29 and 30 and ADI 4578, decided by the Supreme Court, where the number of votes in favor of the thesis of ficha limpa ("clean slate") filled with arguments containing references to popular participation, was higher. In this trial, ministers who used to defend the independence of the court in relation to this influence began to justify their votes in favor of "clean slate" in popular participation. Others simply left out the speech which preached that the court should be free of such interference. Therefore, remains concluded that popular participation has affected the outcome of the hard case "ficha limpa ( clean slate".A judicialização da política inspirou várias pesquisas científicas pela sua novidade e consequências, tendo composto a agenda da Ciência Política contemporânea. Nesse contexto, esta pesquisa buscou investigar a influência da participação popular em sete julgamentos do STF e TSE no caso ficha limpa : RO 1.069-RJ, do TSE (julgado em 2006); ADPF 144-DF, do STF (julgado em 2008); CC 1120-26.2010-DF, do TSE (julgado em 2010); RE s 630.147-DF, 631.102-PA e 633.703-MG, do STF (julgados em 2010 e 2011); e julgamento conjunto das ADC s 29 e 30 e da ADI 4578, do STF (julgado em 2012). O conceito de hard case de Ronald Dworkin e de Robert Alexy, como aquele cuja solução não está expressa no código de leis, foi adotado e se argumentou que nele comumente o julgador está diante de mais de uma decisão racionalmente justificável. Os sete julgados foram tipificados como hard cases. Um conceito de participação popular foi construído para os fins da pesquisa, que aglutinou as contribuições normativas das correntes teóricas da democracia participativa, deliberativa e radical. Para a investigação, os votos publicados nos julgados foram classificados em quatro categorias, segundo estava presente ou ausente a referência à participação popular, se faziam referência a ela como argumento e para qual fim: fazer a defesa da ficha limpa ou da independência da corte em relação a ela. Apesar da participação popular vista nesses processos, principalmente no ano de 2008 e seguintes, o STF e o TSE nos julgamentos analisados não protagonizaram decisões políticas, tendo ratificado decisões políticas já tomadas pelo Legislativo. Por outro lado, a análise dos julgados revelou votos em cujo discurso de fundamentação há referência à participação popular nos julgamentos consumados em 2010, 2011 e 2012. A maior influência foi vista no último julgamento, das ADC s 29 e 30 e da ADI 4578, pelo STF, onde o número de votos em favor da tese ficha limpa com argumentos com referência à participação popular foi maior. Nesse julgado, Ministros que antes vinham defendendo a independência da corte em relação a essa influência passaram a justificar seus votos em defesa da ficha limpa na participação popular. Outros simplesmente abandonaram o discurso que pregava que a corte deveria ficar livre dessa interferência. Assim, concluiu-se que a participação popular influenciou no desfecho do hard case ficha limpa .Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:20:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jose Roberto Moreira.pdf: 6458715 bytes, checksum: a6e04a668d3d7fd1d947b67d059b94ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-09-12application/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanaToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisUNIOESTEBRCentro de Ciências Humanas e Sociaishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHard caseFicha limpaParticipação popularClean slatePopular participationCNPQ::OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAISA participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STFThe popular participation in the hard case ficha limpa: study of seven judjments by TSE and SFTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALJose R Moreira 2012.application/pdf6458715http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2045/1/Jose+R+Moreira+2012.a6e04a668d3d7fd1d947b67d059b94eaMD51tede/20452024-08-05 10:47:28.639oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/2045Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2024-08-05T13:47:28Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The popular participation in the hard case ficha limpa: study of seven judjments by TSE and SFT
title A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
spellingShingle A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
Moreira, José Roberto
Hard case
Ficha limpa
Participação popular
Clean slate
Popular participation
CNPQ::OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
title_short A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
title_full A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
title_fullStr A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
title_full_unstemmed A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
title_sort A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF
author Moreira, José Roberto
author_facet Moreira, José Roberto
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Alves, Gustavo Biasoli
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7679869339058228
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Edmundo Alves de
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4620256355323820
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Dombrowski, Osmir
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8604815798106584
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1326898934291197
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira, José Roberto
contributor_str_mv Alves, Gustavo Biasoli
Oliveira, Edmundo Alves de
Dombrowski, Osmir
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hard case
Ficha limpa
Participação popular
topic Hard case
Ficha limpa
Participação popular
Clean slate
Popular participation
CNPQ::OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Clean slate
Popular participation
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::OUTROS::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
description ABSTRACT The judicialization of politics has inspired several scientific researches due to its novelty and consequences, and formed the agenda of contemporary political science. In this context, this study sought to investigate the influence of popular participation in seven trials judged by the STF and TSE in the case "ficha limpa ( clean slate"): RO 1.069-RJ, by TSE (decided in 2006); ADPF 144-DF, by STF (decided in 2008); CC 1120-26.2010-DF, TSE (decided in 2010); RE s 630.147-DF, 631.102-PA e 633.703-MG, by STF (decided in 2010 and 2011); and joint trial of ADC s 29 and 30, and finally ADI 4578, tried by STF (decided in 2012). The concept of hard case developed by Ronald Dworkin and Robert Alexy, as the one whose solution is not expressed in the code of laws, was adopted and argued that in cases like that the judge commonly stands before more than one decision rationally justifiable. The seven trials were typified as hard cases. A concept of popular participation was built for the research purposes, which brought together normative contributions of theoretical approaches of participatory democracy, deliberative and radical. To perform such investigation, the votes published in the trials were rated into four categories, according to the presence or absence of the citizen participation reference, if they referred to it as an argument and for what purpose: to defend ficha limpa ( clean slate ) or the independence that the court expressed in relation to it. In spite of the public participation seen in these processes, especially in the year 2008 and the following, the Supreme Court and the TSE did not stage political decisions in the analyzed trials, since they had ratified policy decisions that have been already taken by the Legislature. On the other hand, reviews of the trials revealed some votes in whose speech grounds contain a reference to popular participation in the judgments accomplished in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The main influence has been seen in the last trial, the ADC's 29 and 30 and ADI 4578, decided by the Supreme Court, where the number of votes in favor of the thesis of ficha limpa ("clean slate") filled with arguments containing references to popular participation, was higher. In this trial, ministers who used to defend the independence of the court in relation to this influence began to justify their votes in favor of "clean slate" in popular participation. Others simply left out the speech which preached that the court should be free of such interference. Therefore, remains concluded that popular participation has affected the outcome of the hard case "ficha limpa ( clean slate".
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-09-12
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-04-04
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-07-10T18:20:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MOREIRA, José Roberto. A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF. 2012. 163 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2045
identifier_str_mv MOREIRA, José Roberto. A participação popular no hard case ficha limpa: estudo de sete acórdãos no TSE e do STF. 2012. 163 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2012.
url http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2045
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana
Toledo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNIOESTE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana
Toledo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2045/1/Jose+R+Moreira+2012.
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a6e04a668d3d7fd1d947b67d059b94ea
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br
_version_ 1811723321150013440