SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wbatuba, Berenice
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silveira, Daniel, Deponti, Cidonea, Arend, Silvio Cezar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Informe Gepec (Online)
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/29777
Resumo: Organizations had adopted a new style of management and disclosure of their sustainable practices with their stakeholders, one that combines economic efficiency, social and environmental responsibility, so that they are perceived as legitimate in society. The research objective was to analyze how two large companies in COREDE Missões/RS are disclosing the sustainable practices adopted in order, under the perspectives of Environmental Economics or Ecological Economics. Both develop measures of environmental prevention and recovery, by legal requirement, market or strategic management, thus characterizing the notion of the existing social contract between companies and society. The research findings show a concern with the environment that is much more focused on sustainable development of the typically capitalist, hegemonic, anthropocentric model, than in the opposite direction, of ecodevelopment and the disclosure to stakeholders reinforces much more the character of institutional marketing of compliance with imposed norms and laws than the effective awareness of environmental sustainability.
id UNIOESTE-5_4ec3c6c2d8367eb7cc82cd5f24a1a8bf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/29777
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-5
network_name_str Informe Gepec (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVEPRÁTICAS SUSTENTÁVEIS PARA LEGITIMAÇÃO ORGANIZACIONAL NO TERRITÓRIO: A OPÇÃO ENTRE A PERSPECTIVA DA ECONOMIA AMBIENTAL OU DA ECONOMIA ECOLÓGICA /SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE Desenvolvimento SustentávelEconomia AmbientalEconomia EcológicaDivulgação de Práticas SustentáveisTeoria da LegitimidadeOrganizations had adopted a new style of management and disclosure of their sustainable practices with their stakeholders, one that combines economic efficiency, social and environmental responsibility, so that they are perceived as legitimate in society. The research objective was to analyze how two large companies in COREDE Missões/RS are disclosing the sustainable practices adopted in order, under the perspectives of Environmental Economics or Ecological Economics. Both develop measures of environmental prevention and recovery, by legal requirement, market or strategic management, thus characterizing the notion of the existing social contract between companies and society. The research findings show a concern with the environment that is much more focused on sustainable development of the typically capitalist, hegemonic, anthropocentric model, than in the opposite direction, of ecodevelopment and the disclosure to stakeholders reinforces much more the character of institutional marketing of compliance with imposed norms and laws than the effective awareness of environmental sustainability.As organizações tem adotado um novo estilo de gestão e divulgação de suas práticas sustentáveis para seus públicos de interesse, combinando eficiência econômica, responsabilidade social e ambiental, para serem percebidas como legítimas na sociedade. O objetivo da pesquisa foi analisar como duas empresas de grande porte do COREDE Missões/RS divulgam as práticas sustentáveis adotadas, sob as perspectivas das Economias Ambiental e Ecológica. Ambas desenvolvem medidas de prevenção e recuperação ambiental, por exigência legal, do mercado ou por gestão estratégica, caracterizando assim noção do contrato social existente entre as empresas e a sociedade. Os achados da pesquisa evidenciam uma preocupação com o meio ambiente muito mais voltada ao desenvolvimento sustentável do modelo tipicamente capitalista, hegemônico, antropocêntrico do que no sentido contrário, do ecodesenvolvimento e a divulgação aos stakeholders reforça muito mais o caráter de marketing institucional de cumprimento às normas e leis impostas do que a efetiva consciência de sustentabilidade ambiental. Abstract: Organizations had adopted a new style of management and disclosure of their sustainable practices with their stakeholders, one that combines economic efficiency, social and environmental responsibility, so that they are perceived as legitimate in society. The research objective was to analyze how two large companies in COREDE Missões/RS are disclosing the sustainable practices adopted in order, under the perspectives of Environmental Economics or Ecological Economics. Both develop measures of environmental prevention and recovery, by legal requirement, market or strategic management, thus characterizing the notion of the existing social contract between companies and society. The research findings show a concern with the environment that is much more focused on sustainable development of the typically capitalist, hegemonic, anthropocentric model, than in the opposite direction, of ecodevelopment and the disclosure to stakeholders reinforces much more the character of institutional marketing of compliance with imposed norms and laws than the effective awareness of environmental sustainability.EdUnioeste2022-11-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/2977710.48075/igepec.v26i3.29777Informe GEPEC; v. 26 n. 3 (2022): Edição Especial em Homenagem ao Professor Dr. Moacir Piffer e 25 anos da revista Informe GEPEC; 144-1651679-415X1676-067010.48075/igepec.v26i3reponame:Informe Gepec (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/29777/21059Copyright (c) 2022 Informe GEPEChttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWbatuba, BereniceSilveira, DanielDeponti, CidoneaArend, Silvio Cezar2023-05-16T22:07:12Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/29777Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepecPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/oairevista.gepec@gmail.com1679-415X1676-0670opendoar:2023-05-16T22:07:12Informe Gepec (Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
PRÁTICAS SUSTENTÁVEIS PARA LEGITIMAÇÃO ORGANIZACIONAL NO TERRITÓRIO: A OPÇÃO ENTRE A PERSPECTIVA DA ECONOMIA AMBIENTAL OU DA ECONOMIA ECOLÓGICA /SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
title SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
spellingShingle SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
Wbatuba, Berenice
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Economia Ambiental
Economia Ecológica
Divulgação de Práticas Sustentáveis
Teoria da Legitimidade
title_short SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
title_full SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
title_sort SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION IN THE TERRITORY: THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMY OR THE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE
author Wbatuba, Berenice
author_facet Wbatuba, Berenice
Silveira, Daniel
Deponti, Cidonea
Arend, Silvio Cezar
author_role author
author2 Silveira, Daniel
Deponti, Cidonea
Arend, Silvio Cezar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wbatuba, Berenice
Silveira, Daniel
Deponti, Cidonea
Arend, Silvio Cezar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Economia Ambiental
Economia Ecológica
Divulgação de Práticas Sustentáveis
Teoria da Legitimidade
topic Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Economia Ambiental
Economia Ecológica
Divulgação de Práticas Sustentáveis
Teoria da Legitimidade
description Organizations had adopted a new style of management and disclosure of their sustainable practices with their stakeholders, one that combines economic efficiency, social and environmental responsibility, so that they are perceived as legitimate in society. The research objective was to analyze how two large companies in COREDE Missões/RS are disclosing the sustainable practices adopted in order, under the perspectives of Environmental Economics or Ecological Economics. Both develop measures of environmental prevention and recovery, by legal requirement, market or strategic management, thus characterizing the notion of the existing social contract between companies and society. The research findings show a concern with the environment that is much more focused on sustainable development of the typically capitalist, hegemonic, anthropocentric model, than in the opposite direction, of ecodevelopment and the disclosure to stakeholders reinforces much more the character of institutional marketing of compliance with imposed norms and laws than the effective awareness of environmental sustainability.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/29777
10.48075/igepec.v26i3.29777
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/29777
identifier_str_mv 10.48075/igepec.v26i3.29777
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/29777/21059
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Informe GEPEC
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Informe GEPEC
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EdUnioeste
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EdUnioeste
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Informe GEPEC; v. 26 n. 3 (2022): Edição Especial em Homenagem ao Professor Dr. Moacir Piffer e 25 anos da revista Informe GEPEC; 144-165
1679-415X
1676-0670
10.48075/igepec.v26i3
reponame:Informe Gepec (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Informe Gepec (Online)
collection Informe Gepec (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Informe Gepec (Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.gepec@gmail.com
_version_ 1796797392156098560

Registros relacionados