40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito & Paz |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1150 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the apparent conflict established between the Supreme Federal Court’s decision in the judgement of Allegation of Disobedience of Fundamental Precept (ADPF) no. 153 and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ position in the cases “Guerrilha do Araguaia†and Vladimir Herzog and others vs. Brazil. Therefore, it addresses the recognition of the Court of San José’s jurisdiction by Brazil, the concept of transitional justice, the grounds of the ruling in ADPF no. 153 in contrast to inter-American jurisprudence and the search for a solution based on transconstitutionalism and on the theory of double control of human rights. The research uses the deductive approach, through bibliographic and jurisprudential review. In the end, it concludes that, given the need for intersection between court decisions and the distinction of constitutionality and conventionality controls, the Brazilian Amnesty Law has no legal effects and cannot be invoked to exempt the liability of repression agents of the military dictatorship. |
id |
UNISAL-2_63676258090cc7e647ac27efc607f16a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1150 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISAL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS40 ANOS DA LEI DA ANISTIA BRASILEIRA: ANÃLISE DA ADPF 153 E DOS CASOS “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†E VLADIMIR HERZOG, SOB A PERSPECTIVA DO TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISMO E DA TEORIA DO DUPLO CONTROLE DE DIREITOS HUMANOSThis article analyzes the apparent conflict established between the Supreme Federal Court’s decision in the judgement of Allegation of Disobedience of Fundamental Precept (ADPF) no. 153 and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ position in the cases “Guerrilha do Araguaia†and Vladimir Herzog and others vs. Brazil. Therefore, it addresses the recognition of the Court of San José’s jurisdiction by Brazil, the concept of transitional justice, the grounds of the ruling in ADPF no. 153 in contrast to inter-American jurisprudence and the search for a solution based on transconstitutionalism and on the theory of double control of human rights. The research uses the deductive approach, through bibliographic and jurisprudential review. In the end, it concludes that, given the need for intersection between court decisions and the distinction of constitutionality and conventionality controls, the Brazilian Amnesty Law has no legal effects and cannot be invoked to exempt the liability of repression agents of the military dictatorship.O presente artigo analisa o aparente conflito estabelecido entre a decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal no julgamento da Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental (ADPF) n° 153 e o posicionamento da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos nos casos “Guerrilha do Araguaia†e Vladimir Herzog e outros vs. Brasil. Para tanto, são abordados o reconhecimento da jurisdição da Corte de San José pelo Estado Brasileiro, o conceito de justiça de transição, os fundamentos do acórdão proferido na ADPF n° 153 em contraste com a jurisprudência interamericana e a busca por uma solução pautada no transconstitucionalismo e na teoria do duplo controle de direitos humanos. A pesquisa utiliza-se do método dedutivo, mediante revisão bibliográfica e jurisprudencial. Ao final, conclui-se que, diante da necessidade de intersecção entre as decisões proferidas pelos tribunais e de distinção dos controles de constitucionalidade e de convencionalidade realizados, a Lei da Anistia brasileira carece de efeitos jurÃdicos e não pode ser invocada para isentar a responsabilidade dos agentes de repressão da ditadura militar.Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena2020-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/115010.32713/rdp.v1i42.1150Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 42 (2020): Revista Direito & Paz; 309-3272359-503510.32713/rdp.v1i42reponame:Revista Direito & Pazinstname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)instacron:UNISALporhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1150/523Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito & Pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFuchs Marino, TiagoCoimbra de Carvalho, Luciani2020-07-17T17:28:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1150Revistahttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/ONGhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/oaimestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br2359-50351518-7047opendoar:2020-07-17T17:28:40Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS 40 ANOS DA LEI DA ANISTIA BRASILEIRA: ANÃLISE DA ADPF 153 E DOS CASOS “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†E VLADIMIR HERZOG, SOB A PERSPECTIVA DO TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISMO E DA TEORIA DO DUPLO CONTROLE DE DIREITOS HUMANOS |
title |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
spellingShingle |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS Fuchs Marino, Tiago |
title_short |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
title_full |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
title_fullStr |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
title_sort |
40 YEARS OF BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW: ANALYSIS OF ADPF 153 AND CASES “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA†AND VLADIMIR HERZOG, UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRANSCONSTITUCIONALISM AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE CONTROL OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
author |
Fuchs Marino, Tiago |
author_facet |
Fuchs Marino, Tiago Coimbra de Carvalho, Luciani |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coimbra de Carvalho, Luciani |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fuchs Marino, Tiago Coimbra de Carvalho, Luciani |
description |
This article analyzes the apparent conflict established between the Supreme Federal Court’s decision in the judgement of Allegation of Disobedience of Fundamental Precept (ADPF) no. 153 and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ position in the cases “Guerrilha do Araguaia†and Vladimir Herzog and others vs. Brazil. Therefore, it addresses the recognition of the Court of San José’s jurisdiction by Brazil, the concept of transitional justice, the grounds of the ruling in ADPF no. 153 in contrast to inter-American jurisprudence and the search for a solution based on transconstitutionalism and on the theory of double control of human rights. The research uses the deductive approach, through bibliographic and jurisprudential review. In the end, it concludes that, given the need for intersection between court decisions and the distinction of constitutionality and conventionality controls, the Brazilian Amnesty Law has no legal effects and cannot be invoked to exempt the liability of repression agents of the military dictatorship. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1150 10.32713/rdp.v1i42.1150 |
url |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1150 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32713/rdp.v1i42.1150 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1150/523 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito & Paz info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito & Paz |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 42 (2020): Revista Direito & Paz; 309-327 2359-5035 10.32713/rdp.v1i42 reponame:Revista Direito & Paz instname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) instacron:UNISAL |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
instacron_str |
UNISAL |
institution |
UNISAL |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
collection |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1798042364821897216 |