You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carmelino, Ana Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Luiz Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998
Resumo: In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic.
id UNISC-3_19a16c4ad7556897e6dad0298bc43a07
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7998
network_acronym_str UNISC-3
network_name_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanismMe engana que eu gosto! Falácias como mecanismo de produção do risoFalácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD.Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD.In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic.No processo de persuasão estão implicados diferentes tipos de argumentos. Há aqueles que parecem convincentes para grande parte do auditório, mas são falaciosos, produtos de raciocínios falsos, que apenas simulam a veracidade de um fato, acontecimento ou opinião. Conhecer os tipos de falácias é relevante para evitar armadilhas lógicas no processo argumentativo bem como para analisar a argumentação alheia. Este artigo pretende tratar desses argumentos a fim de desvelar outra função exercida por eles na arte de argumentar: a de produzir humor. Para isso, busca-se demonstrar como diferentes textos humorísticos se utilizam de falácias para provocar o riso. O corpus de análise consiste em exemplos retirados das edições impressas de 2015 da versão brasileira da revista MAD, um periódico de humor publicado no país desde 1974. O referencial teórico que fundamenta as análises advém da Retórica e da Lógica.Edunisc2017-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/799810.17058/signo.v42i73.7998Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 98-1091982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarmelino, Ana CristinaFerreira, Luiz Antonio2018-07-26T17:31:58Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7998Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2018-07-26T17:31:58Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
Me engana que eu gosto! Falácias como mecanismo de produção do riso
title You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
spellingShingle You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
Carmelino, Ana Cristina
Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD.
Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD.
title_short You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
title_full You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
title_fullStr You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
title_full_unstemmed You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
title_sort You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
author Carmelino, Ana Cristina
author_facet Carmelino, Ana Cristina
Ferreira, Luiz Antonio
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Luiz Antonio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carmelino, Ana Cristina
Ferreira, Luiz Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD.
Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD.
topic Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD.
Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD.
description In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998
10.17058/signo.v42i73.7998
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/signo.v42i73.7998
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 98-109
1982-2014
reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218790846267392

Registros relacionados