You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998 |
Resumo: | In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic. |
id |
UNISC-3_19a16c4ad7556897e6dad0298bc43a07 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7998 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-3 |
network_name_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanismMe engana que eu gosto! Falácias como mecanismo de produção do risoFalácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD.Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD.In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic.No processo de persuasão estão implicados diferentes tipos de argumentos. Há aqueles que parecem convincentes para grande parte do auditório, mas são falaciosos, produtos de raciocínios falsos, que apenas simulam a veracidade de um fato, acontecimento ou opinião. Conhecer os tipos de falácias é relevante para evitar armadilhas lógicas no processo argumentativo bem como para analisar a argumentação alheia. Este artigo pretende tratar desses argumentos a fim de desvelar outra função exercida por eles na arte de argumentar: a de produzir humor. Para isso, busca-se demonstrar como diferentes textos humorísticos se utilizam de falácias para provocar o riso. O corpus de análise consiste em exemplos retirados das edições impressas de 2015 da versão brasileira da revista MAD, um periódico de humor publicado no país desde 1974. O referencial teórico que fundamenta as análises advém da Retórica e da Lógica.Edunisc2017-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/799810.17058/signo.v42i73.7998Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 98-1091982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarmelino, Ana CristinaFerreira, Luiz Antonio2018-07-26T17:31:58Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7998Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2018-07-26T17:31:58Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism Me engana que eu gosto! Falácias como mecanismo de produção do riso |
title |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
spellingShingle |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism Carmelino, Ana Cristina Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD. Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD. |
title_short |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
title_full |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
title_fullStr |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
title_sort |
You could've fooled me! Fallacies as laughing production mechanism |
author |
Carmelino, Ana Cristina |
author_facet |
Carmelino, Ana Cristina Ferreira, Luiz Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Luiz Antonio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carmelino, Ana Cristina Ferreira, Luiz Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD. Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD. |
topic |
Falácia. Argumentação. Humor. MAD. Fallacy. Argumentation. Humor. MAD. |
description |
In the persuasion process they are involved different types of arguments. There are those who seem convincing for the most part of the audience, but are fallacious, false reasoning products, which only simulate the truth of a fact, event or opinion. Knowing types of fallacies is relevant to avoid traps in the logical argumentative process and to analyze other people's arguments. This article aims to address these arguments in order to reveal another function performed by them in the art of reasoning: to produce humor. For this, we seek to demonstrate how diferente humorous texts are used fallacies to provoke laughter. The analysis corpus consists of examples taken from the printed editions in 2015 of Brazilian version of MAD magazine, a journal of humor published in the country since 1974. The theoretical framework underlying the analysis comes from the Rhetoric and Logic. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998 10.17058/signo.v42i73.7998 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/signo.v42i73.7998 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7998/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Signo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Signo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 98-109 1982-2014 reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800218790846267392 |