Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Volcão, Lisiane Martins
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Coelho, Tatiane Silveira, Vàsquez, Alváro, Cerdeiras, Maria Pia, Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da, Júnior, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva, Ramos, Daniela Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/8200
Resumo: Justificative and Objectives: the study aimed the assessment of the antibacterial activity of crude extracts and fractions of Ibicella lutea, front Staphylococcus aureus, thecombination of these compounds and cytotoxic activity. Methods: was used for antibacterial activity the Microdilution Test Broth, and performed the Checkerboard Test. The extracts showed antibacterial activity were submitted to the citotoxicity test, with macrophages cell and determination of the Selectivity Index (SI). Results: The acetate etila fraction (AcOE) was better antimicrobial activity (6.25 µg/mL) compared with the others extracts and fractions used, however none of the compounds showed bactericidal activity in concentrations employed. In present study, we can be observed an additive activity between AcOE and methanolic (MeOH) fractions, and indifferent interaction between crude extracts. According to citotoxicity test, the extract which led to a higher survival rate of macrophage cells was the fraction AcOE (IC50%=30.35 µg/mL). However, when the calculated SI no satisfactory results (SI < 10) to any of the extracts was observed. Conclusions: in the present study we can observe an antimicrobial activity of the fractions AcOE and MeOH to S. aureus, as well as an additive this potential when the fractions are combined, providing support from isolation and characterization of yours active components. Despite the extracts did not showed a satisfactory SI, new toxicity studies should be performed to establish the potential use of safety with the products derived from I. lutea, such as drugs for topical and biocide products.
id UNISC-4_2e5f721442ae0420db18e0051c770139
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8200
network_acronym_str UNISC-4
network_name_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureusAvaliação de Ibicella lutea como agente antimicrobiano frente à Staphylococcus aureusJustificative and Objectives: the study aimed the assessment of the antibacterial activity of crude extracts and fractions of Ibicella lutea, front Staphylococcus aureus, thecombination of these compounds and cytotoxic activity. Methods: was used for antibacterial activity the Microdilution Test Broth, and performed the Checkerboard Test. The extracts showed antibacterial activity were submitted to the citotoxicity test, with macrophages cell and determination of the Selectivity Index (SI). Results: The acetate etila fraction (AcOE) was better antimicrobial activity (6.25 µg/mL) compared with the others extracts and fractions used, however none of the compounds showed bactericidal activity in concentrations employed. In present study, we can be observed an additive activity between AcOE and methanolic (MeOH) fractions, and indifferent interaction between crude extracts. According to citotoxicity test, the extract which led to a higher survival rate of macrophage cells was the fraction AcOE (IC50%=30.35 µg/mL). However, when the calculated SI no satisfactory results (SI < 10) to any of the extracts was observed. Conclusions: in the present study we can observe an antimicrobial activity of the fractions AcOE and MeOH to S. aureus, as well as an additive this potential when the fractions are combined, providing support from isolation and characterization of yours active components. Despite the extracts did not showed a satisfactory SI, new toxicity studies should be performed to establish the potential use of safety with the products derived from I. lutea, such as drugs for topical and biocide products.Justificativa e Objetivos: O estudo objetivou a avaliação da atividade antibacteriana de extratos brutos e frações de Ibicella lutea, na inibição do crescimento de Staphylococcus aureus, avaliando a combinação destes compostos e sua atividade citotóxica. Métodos: Para a atividade antibacteriana dos extratos foi utilizado o Teste de Microdiluição em Caldo, seguido do Teste Checkerboard. Os extratos que apresentaram atividade antibacteriana foram submetidos ao teste de citotoxicidade, com células macrofágicas e determinação do seu Índice de Seletividade (IS). Resultados: A fração de acetato de etila(AcOE) obteve o melhor potencial antibacteriano (6,25 µg/mL), entretanto nenhum dos compostos testados apresentaram atividade bactericida nas concentrações empregadas. Neste estudo pode-se observar uma ação aditiva entre as frações AcOE e metanólica (MeOH), sendo a interação entre os extratos brutos indiferente. De acordo com o teste de citotoxicidade, a fração AcOE apresentou uma maior índice de sobrevivência das células macrofágicas (IC50%=30,35 µg/mL). Entretanto, quando calculado o IS, não houve resultados satisfatórios (IS < 10) para os extratos analisados. Conclusões: Neste estudo observou-se o potencial antibacteriano das frações AcOE e MeOH, assim como uma ação aditiva na combinação das frações, dando suporte para o isolamento e caracterização de seus componentes ativos. Apesar dos extratos não apresentarem um IS satisfatório, novos estudos de toxicidade devem ser realizados para determinar com segurança o potencial de uso dos produtos provenientes de I. lutea, como é o caso de medicamentos para uso tópico ou biocidas.Unisc2016-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/820010.17058/reci.v6i4.8200Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2016); 191-196Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 6 n. 4 (2016); 191-1962238-3360reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecçãoinstname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/8200/5180Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVolcão, Lisiane MartinsCoelho, Tatiane SilveiraVàsquez, AlvároCerdeiras, Maria PiaSilva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida daJúnior, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da SilvaRamos, Daniela Fernandes2019-01-21T12:53:32Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8200Revistahttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/indexONGhttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/oai||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com2238-33602238-3360opendoar:2019-01-21T12:53:32Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
Avaliação de Ibicella lutea como agente antimicrobiano frente à Staphylococcus aureus
title Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
spellingShingle Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
Volcão, Lisiane Martins
title_short Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort Assessment of Ibicella lutea for antibacterial agent front Staphylococcus aureus
author Volcão, Lisiane Martins
author_facet Volcão, Lisiane Martins
Coelho, Tatiane Silveira
Vàsquez, Alváro
Cerdeiras, Maria Pia
Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da
Júnior, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva
Ramos, Daniela Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Tatiane Silveira
Vàsquez, Alváro
Cerdeiras, Maria Pia
Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da
Júnior, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva
Ramos, Daniela Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Volcão, Lisiane Martins
Coelho, Tatiane Silveira
Vàsquez, Alváro
Cerdeiras, Maria Pia
Silva, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da
Júnior, Flávio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva
Ramos, Daniela Fernandes
description Justificative and Objectives: the study aimed the assessment of the antibacterial activity of crude extracts and fractions of Ibicella lutea, front Staphylococcus aureus, thecombination of these compounds and cytotoxic activity. Methods: was used for antibacterial activity the Microdilution Test Broth, and performed the Checkerboard Test. The extracts showed antibacterial activity were submitted to the citotoxicity test, with macrophages cell and determination of the Selectivity Index (SI). Results: The acetate etila fraction (AcOE) was better antimicrobial activity (6.25 µg/mL) compared with the others extracts and fractions used, however none of the compounds showed bactericidal activity in concentrations employed. In present study, we can be observed an additive activity between AcOE and methanolic (MeOH) fractions, and indifferent interaction between crude extracts. According to citotoxicity test, the extract which led to a higher survival rate of macrophage cells was the fraction AcOE (IC50%=30.35 µg/mL). However, when the calculated SI no satisfactory results (SI < 10) to any of the extracts was observed. Conclusions: in the present study we can observe an antimicrobial activity of the fractions AcOE and MeOH to S. aureus, as well as an additive this potential when the fractions are combined, providing support from isolation and characterization of yours active components. Despite the extracts did not showed a satisfactory SI, new toxicity studies should be performed to establish the potential use of safety with the products derived from I. lutea, such as drugs for topical and biocide products.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/8200
10.17058/reci.v6i4.8200
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/8200
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/reci.v6i4.8200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/8200/5180
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2016); 191-196
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 6 n. 4 (2016); 191-196
2238-3360
reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
collection Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218810631847936