Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Piraux, Marc
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia, Caniello, Marcio, Rocha, Betty Nogueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233
Resumo: Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization.
id UNISC-6_4c9695fcf1e8a0f75efe47819e24f805
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/15233
network_acronym_str UNISC-6
network_name_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)Evaluar la gestión social en la gobernanza territorial: bricolaje, aprendizaje e hibridación en la construcción del Índice de Gestión Social (IGS)Avaliar a gestão social na governança territorial: bricolagem, aprendizagem e hibridação na construção do Índice de Gestão Social (IGS)Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil.Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil.Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil.Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization.Entre 2003 y 2016, el gobierno federal brasileño implementó el Programa Nacional para el Desarrollo Sostenible de los Territorios Rurales (PRONAT), cuya gobernanza se llevó a cabo en colegiados participativos paritarios formados por actores sociales, sus organizaciones y representantes gubernamentales. La gestión social constituyó el marco regulatorio del programa y el ciclo de gestión social buscó organizar los procesos de participación, coordinación, gestión y control social de las políticas públicas por parte de los actores territoriales. El Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario comenzó a diseñar su sistema de monitoreo y evaluación en 2007. Para este propósito, se movilizaron equipos de investigadores de varias universidades públicas del país. La evaluación de la gestión social y sus indicadores concretos se desarrollaron en dos ciclos de monitoreo y evaluación, configurándose como un proceso descentralizado a través de un índice compuesto por varios indicadores relevantes teórica y metodológicamente, integrados en el Índice de Gestión Social (IGS). El objetivo de este trabajo es: (i) discutir las referencias teóricas que guiaron la construcción del IGS, ii) presentar la trayectoria de la metodología de evaluación y los sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación asociados y iii) caracterizar las dimensiones del índice. Enseñanzas son recorridas sobre el proceso de construcción del IGS que favoreció el bricolaje, el aprendizaje y la hibridación.Entre 2003 e 2016, o governo federal brasileiro implementou o Programa Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentável dos Territórios Rurais (PRONAT), cuja governança se processava em colegiados participativos paritários formados pelos atores sociais, suas organizações e representantes governamentais. A gestão social constituiu o marco orientador do programa e o ciclo de gestão social buscava organizar os processos de participação, coordenação, gestão e controle social das políticas públicas pelos atores territoriais. O Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário começou a desenhar o seu sistema de monitoramento e avaliação em 2007. Para isso, equipes de pesquisadores de diversas universidades públicas do país foram mobilizadas. A avaliação da gestão social e seus indicadores concretos foram desenvolvidos em dois ciclos de monitoramento e avaliação, configurando-se como um processo descentralizado por meio de um índice composto pelos diversos indicadores relevantes teórica e metodologicamente, enfeixados no Índice de Gestão Social (IGS). Este artigo tem como objetivos: (i) discutir os referencias teóricos que orientaram a construção do IGS, (ii) apresentar a trajetória da metodologia de avaliação e dos sistemas de monitoramento e avaliação associados e (iii) caracterizar as dimensões do índice. Ensinamentos são tirados quanto ao processo de construção do IGS que privilegiou a bricolagem, a aprendizagem e a hibridação.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2020-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1523310.17058/redes.v25i3.15233Redes ; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; v. 25 n. 3 (2020); 1071-10951982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPiraux, MarcPerafán, Mireya E. ValenciaCaniello, MarcioRocha, Betty Nogueira2021-05-18T15:09:20Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/15233Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2021-05-18T15:09:20Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
Evaluar la gestión social en la gobernanza territorial: bricolaje, aprendizaje e hibridación en la construcción del Índice de Gestión Social (IGS)
Avaliar a gestão social na governança territorial: bricolagem, aprendizagem e hibridação na construção do Índice de Gestão Social (IGS)
title Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
spellingShingle Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
Piraux, Marc
Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil.
Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil.
Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil.
title_short Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
title_full Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
title_fullStr Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
title_full_unstemmed Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
title_sort Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
author Piraux, Marc
author_facet Piraux, Marc
Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia
Caniello, Marcio
Rocha, Betty Nogueira
author_role author
author2 Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia
Caniello, Marcio
Rocha, Betty Nogueira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Piraux, Marc
Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia
Caniello, Marcio
Rocha, Betty Nogueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil.
Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil.
Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil.
topic Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil.
Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil.
Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil.
description Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233
10.17058/redes.v25i3.15233
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/redes.v25i3.15233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redes ; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095
Redes; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2020); 1071-1095
Redes; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095
Redes; v. 25 n. 3 (2020); 1071-1095
1982-6745
reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br
_version_ 1800218773887647744