Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233 |
Resumo: | Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization. |
id |
UNISC-6_4c9695fcf1e8a0f75efe47819e24f805 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/15233 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-6 |
network_name_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS)Evaluar la gestión social en la gobernanza territorial: bricolaje, aprendizaje e hibridación en la construcción del Índice de Gestión Social (IGS)Avaliar a gestão social na governança territorial: bricolagem, aprendizagem e hibridação na construção do Índice de Gestão Social (IGS)Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil.Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil.Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil.Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization.Entre 2003 y 2016, el gobierno federal brasileño implementó el Programa Nacional para el Desarrollo Sostenible de los Territorios Rurales (PRONAT), cuya gobernanza se llevó a cabo en colegiados participativos paritarios formados por actores sociales, sus organizaciones y representantes gubernamentales. La gestión social constituyó el marco regulatorio del programa y el ciclo de gestión social buscó organizar los procesos de participación, coordinación, gestión y control social de las políticas públicas por parte de los actores territoriales. El Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario comenzó a diseñar su sistema de monitoreo y evaluación en 2007. Para este propósito, se movilizaron equipos de investigadores de varias universidades públicas del país. La evaluación de la gestión social y sus indicadores concretos se desarrollaron en dos ciclos de monitoreo y evaluación, configurándose como un proceso descentralizado a través de un índice compuesto por varios indicadores relevantes teórica y metodológicamente, integrados en el Índice de Gestión Social (IGS). El objetivo de este trabajo es: (i) discutir las referencias teóricas que guiaron la construcción del IGS, ii) presentar la trayectoria de la metodología de evaluación y los sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación asociados y iii) caracterizar las dimensiones del índice. Enseñanzas son recorridas sobre el proceso de construcción del IGS que favoreció el bricolaje, el aprendizaje y la hibridación.Entre 2003 e 2016, o governo federal brasileiro implementou o Programa Nacional de Desenvolvimento Sustentável dos Territórios Rurais (PRONAT), cuja governança se processava em colegiados participativos paritários formados pelos atores sociais, suas organizações e representantes governamentais. A gestão social constituiu o marco orientador do programa e o ciclo de gestão social buscava organizar os processos de participação, coordenação, gestão e controle social das políticas públicas pelos atores territoriais. O Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário começou a desenhar o seu sistema de monitoramento e avaliação em 2007. Para isso, equipes de pesquisadores de diversas universidades públicas do país foram mobilizadas. A avaliação da gestão social e seus indicadores concretos foram desenvolvidos em dois ciclos de monitoramento e avaliação, configurando-se como um processo descentralizado por meio de um índice composto pelos diversos indicadores relevantes teórica e metodologicamente, enfeixados no Índice de Gestão Social (IGS). Este artigo tem como objetivos: (i) discutir os referencias teóricos que orientaram a construção do IGS, (ii) apresentar a trajetória da metodologia de avaliação e dos sistemas de monitoramento e avaliação associados e (iii) caracterizar as dimensões do índice. Ensinamentos são tirados quanto ao processo de construção do IGS que privilegiou a bricolagem, a aprendizagem e a hibridação.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2020-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1523310.17058/redes.v25i3.15233Redes ; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095Redes; v. 25 n. 3 (2020); 1071-10951982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPiraux, MarcPerafán, Mireya E. ValenciaCaniello, MarcioRocha, Betty Nogueira2021-05-18T15:09:20Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/15233Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2021-05-18T15:09:20Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) Evaluar la gestión social en la gobernanza territorial: bricolaje, aprendizaje e hibridación en la construcción del Índice de Gestión Social (IGS) Avaliar a gestão social na governança territorial: bricolagem, aprendizagem e hibridação na construção do Índice de Gestão Social (IGS) |
title |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
spellingShingle |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) Piraux, Marc Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil. Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil. Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil. |
title_short |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
title_full |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
title_fullStr |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
title_sort |
Assess social management in territorial governance: tinkering, learning and hybridization in the construction of the Social Management Index (IGS) |
author |
Piraux, Marc |
author_facet |
Piraux, Marc Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia Caniello, Marcio Rocha, Betty Nogueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia Caniello, Marcio Rocha, Betty Nogueira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Piraux, Marc Perafán, Mireya E. Valencia Caniello, Marcio Rocha, Betty Nogueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil. Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil. Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil. |
topic |
Territorial governance. Evaluation. Social management. Territorial development. Brazil. Gobernanza territorial. Evaluación. Gestión social. Desarrollo territorial. Brasil. Governança territorial. Avaliação. Gestão social. Desenvolvimento territorial. Brasil. |
description |
Between 2003 and 2016, the Brazilian federal government implemented the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), whose governance took place in joint participatory colleges formed by social actors, their organizations and government representatives. Social management constituted the guiding framework of the program and the social management cycle sought to organize the processes of participation, coordination, management and social control of public policies by territorial actors. The Ministry of Agrarian Development began to design its monitoring and evaluation system in 2007. For this purpose, it mobilized teams of researchers from several public universities in the country. The evaluation of social management and its concrete indicators in two cycles of monitoring and evaluation, configuring itself as a decentralized process through an index composed of the several relevant indicators theoretically and methodologically, embedded in the Social Management Index (IGS). This paper aims to: (i) discuss the theoretical references that guided the construction of the IGS, ii) present the trajectory of the evaluation methodology and the associated monitoring and evaluation systems and iii) characterize the dimensions of the index. Lessons are given about construction process that favoured tinkering, learning and hybridization. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233 10.17058/redes.v25i3.15233 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/redes.v25i3.15233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/15233/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Redes (St. Cruz Sul, Online) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redes ; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095 Redes; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2020); 1071-1095 Redes; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020); 1071-1095 Redes; v. 25 n. 3 (2020); 1071-1095 1982-6745 reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br |
_version_ |
1800218773887647744 |