Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha Kroth
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Karnopp, Erica, Deponti, Cidonea Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/8391
Resumo: It is discussed in this article some aspects of the debate on the (dis) appearance of peasant agriculture as a recurring theme that gained visibility in different contexts and theoretical perspectives with different understandings, conceptions and perceptions. This discussion, results of processes that are under construction, will be (re) meanings and (re) produced by the subjects themselves permanently "to do" in the struggle for different ways of life and in turn, these buildings are in dispute both academic world and the political world. Works with the idea that even considering the conflicts and contradictions inherent in the rural context, peasant agriculture instead of its demise, it reinvents itself and grows. The conceptual review on the subject is given from a reading of classical authors like Lenin (1899/1985) Kautsky (1980) Shanin (2005) in dialogue with other authors such as: Lamarche (1993.1998) and Abramovay (1992) Wanderley (1989), Oliveira (2004), Mendras (1976) Sandroni (1985). Search on the Movement of Peasant Women of experience in Santa Catarina the meanings of the term camponês - peasant, as well as aspects of the experience of peasant women of this movement in relation to the reframing of peasant agriculture. In conclusion, contrary to what has been said historically, the way of peasant life, instead of disappearing, (re) create, (re) invents and (re) places in the different scenarios as a way of life, resistance and coping with the determinations of the Capital.
id UNISC-6_d494177a7a87fbd8a92a983cb46b6bab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8391
network_acronym_str UNISC-6
network_name_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?A Agricultura Camponesa (des)aparecerá frente às determinações do Capital e/ou se (re)criará?Campesinato. Desenvolvimento rural. Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas de Santa Catarina.Peasantry. Rural development. Peasant Women's Movement of Santa Catarina.It is discussed in this article some aspects of the debate on the (dis) appearance of peasant agriculture as a recurring theme that gained visibility in different contexts and theoretical perspectives with different understandings, conceptions and perceptions. This discussion, results of processes that are under construction, will be (re) meanings and (re) produced by the subjects themselves permanently "to do" in the struggle for different ways of life and in turn, these buildings are in dispute both academic world and the political world. Works with the idea that even considering the conflicts and contradictions inherent in the rural context, peasant agriculture instead of its demise, it reinvents itself and grows. The conceptual review on the subject is given from a reading of classical authors like Lenin (1899/1985) Kautsky (1980) Shanin (2005) in dialogue with other authors such as: Lamarche (1993.1998) and Abramovay (1992) Wanderley (1989), Oliveira (2004), Mendras (1976) Sandroni (1985). Search on the Movement of Peasant Women of experience in Santa Catarina the meanings of the term camponês - peasant, as well as aspects of the experience of peasant women of this movement in relation to the reframing of peasant agriculture. In conclusion, contrary to what has been said historically, the way of peasant life, instead of disappearing, (re) create, (re) invents and (re) places in the different scenarios as a way of life, resistance and coping with the determinations of the Capital.Discute-se neste artigo alguns aspectos relacionados ao debate sobre o (des)aparecimento da agricultura camponesa como um tema recorrente que ganha visibilidade em diferentes contextos e perspectivas teóricas com diferentes entendimentos, concepções e percepções. Esta discussão resulta de processos que estão em construção, vão sendo (re)significados e (re)elaborados pelos próprios sujeitos que permanentemente “se fazem” nas lutas por diferentes modos de vida e por sua vez, tais construções estão em disputa tanto no mundo acadêmico quanto no mundo político. Trabalha-se com a ideia de que mesmo considerando os conflitos e as contradições inerentes ao contexto rural, a agricultura camponesa ao invés de desaparecer, se reinventa e se fortalece. A revisão conceitual sobre o tema se dá a partir de uma leitura de autores clássicos como Lênin (1899/1985) Kautsky (1980) Shanin (2005) em diálogo com outros autores como: Lamarche (1993,1998) e Abramovay (1992), Wanderley (1989), Oliveira (2004), Mendras (1976) Sandroni (1985). Busca-se na experiência do Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas em Santa Catarina os significados do termo camponês – camponesa, bem como, aspectos relativos à experiência das mulheres camponesas desse Movimento em relação à ressignificação da agricultura camponesa. Conclui-se que contrariamente ao que vem sendo afirmado historicamente, o modo de vida camponesa, ao invés de desaparecer, se (re)cria, se (re)inventa e se (re)coloca nos diferentes cenários enquanto modo de vida, de resistência e de enfrentamento às determinações do Capital.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2016-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/839110.17058/redes.v21i3.8391Redes ; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48Redes; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48Redes; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48Redes; v. 21 n. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-481982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/8391/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Redesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha KrothKarnopp, EricaDeponti, Cidonea Machado2019-10-03T17:40:13Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8391Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2019-10-03T17:40:13Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
A Agricultura Camponesa (des)aparecerá frente às determinações do Capital e/ou se (re)criará?
title Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
spellingShingle Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
Gaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha Kroth
Campesinato. Desenvolvimento rural. Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas de Santa Catarina.
Peasantry. Rural development. Peasant Women's Movement of Santa Catarina.
title_short Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
title_full Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
title_fullStr Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
title_full_unstemmed Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
title_sort Will Family Farming disappear when faced with capitalist determinations or will it (re)create itself?
author Gaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha Kroth
author_facet Gaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha Kroth
Karnopp, Erica
Deponti, Cidonea Machado
author_role author
author2 Karnopp, Erica
Deponti, Cidonea Machado
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gaspareto, Sirlei Antoninha Kroth
Karnopp, Erica
Deponti, Cidonea Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Campesinato. Desenvolvimento rural. Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas de Santa Catarina.
Peasantry. Rural development. Peasant Women's Movement of Santa Catarina.
topic Campesinato. Desenvolvimento rural. Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas de Santa Catarina.
Peasantry. Rural development. Peasant Women's Movement of Santa Catarina.
description It is discussed in this article some aspects of the debate on the (dis) appearance of peasant agriculture as a recurring theme that gained visibility in different contexts and theoretical perspectives with different understandings, conceptions and perceptions. This discussion, results of processes that are under construction, will be (re) meanings and (re) produced by the subjects themselves permanently "to do" in the struggle for different ways of life and in turn, these buildings are in dispute both academic world and the political world. Works with the idea that even considering the conflicts and contradictions inherent in the rural context, peasant agriculture instead of its demise, it reinvents itself and grows. The conceptual review on the subject is given from a reading of classical authors like Lenin (1899/1985) Kautsky (1980) Shanin (2005) in dialogue with other authors such as: Lamarche (1993.1998) and Abramovay (1992) Wanderley (1989), Oliveira (2004), Mendras (1976) Sandroni (1985). Search on the Movement of Peasant Women of experience in Santa Catarina the meanings of the term camponês - peasant, as well as aspects of the experience of peasant women of this movement in relation to the reframing of peasant agriculture. In conclusion, contrary to what has been said historically, the way of peasant life, instead of disappearing, (re) create, (re) invents and (re) places in the different scenarios as a way of life, resistance and coping with the determinations of the Capital.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/8391
10.17058/redes.v21i3.8391
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/8391
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/redes.v21i3.8391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/8391/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Redes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Redes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redes ; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48
Redes; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48
Redes; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48
Redes; v. 21 n. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 34-48
1982-6745
reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br
_version_ 1800218770437832704