Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Comin, Fabio Scorsolini
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Verso e Reverso (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998
Resumo: The objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings.
id UNISINOS-2_746a235815fb8f12f4e57265eb90d5c0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/6998
network_acronym_str UNISINOS-2
network_name_str Verso e Reverso (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourseAutoria e heterogeneidade no discurso amoroso de CarasThe objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings.O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar, segundo os pressupostos teóricos da Análise do Discurso de matriz francesa, os discursos produzidos acerca do amor em uma revista de circulação nacional, tentando compreender em que medida os autores desta seção assumem, ou não, os princípios de autoria e argumentação, investigando as marcas de heterogeneidade presentes nos discursos. Analisou-se quatro artigos publicados na coluna Amor, da revista Caras®. Em alguns recortes analisados, os autores, a partir de suas práticas como psicoterapeutas, mesclam seus posicionamentos pessoais com a experiência de seus pacientes. Em outros casos, relatam apenas as vivências de pacientes, distanciando-se das mesmas. Isso nos remete à discussão sobre a assunção da autoria nos profissionais da área psi, que não apenas devem trabalhar com questões do psiquismo humano, mas devem abrir-se à possibilidade de se colocarem como co-produtores de discursos e saberes, a partir do diálogo com o outro/Outro. Assim, a autoria, além de exigir que o sujeito se responsabilize pelo seu dizer, reclama do autor um trabalho com a heterogeneidade constitutiva da linguagem, uma vez que cabe à função-autor controlar a produção de sentidos das vozes que dialogam nos textos, criando a ilusão de unidade textual.Verso e Reverso2010-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/699810.4013/6998Verso e Reverso; v. 22 n. 51: Ano XXII - 2008/31806-6925reponame:Verso e Reverso (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:UNISINOSporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998/3983Comin, Fabio ScorsoliniPacífico, Soraya Maria Romanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-10T13:33:25Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/6998Revistahttp://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereversoPRIhttp://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/oaiperiodicos@unisinos.br||bmarocco@unisinos.br1806-69250103-1414opendoar:2014-03-10T13:33:25Verso e Reverso (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
Autoria e heterogeneidade no discurso amoroso de Caras
title Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
spellingShingle Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
Comin, Fabio Scorsolini
title_short Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
title_full Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
title_fullStr Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
title_full_unstemmed Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
title_sort Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
author Comin, Fabio Scorsolini
author_facet Comin, Fabio Scorsolini
Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano
author_role author
author2 Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Comin, Fabio Scorsolini
Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano
description The objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998
10.4013/6998
url https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998
identifier_str_mv 10.4013/6998
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998/3983
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Verso e Reverso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Verso e Reverso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Verso e Reverso; v. 22 n. 51: Ano XXII - 2008/3
1806-6925
reponame:Verso e Reverso (Online)
instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron:UNISINOS
instname_str Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
instacron_str UNISINOS
institution UNISINOS
reponame_str Verso e Reverso (Online)
collection Verso e Reverso (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Verso e Reverso (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv periodicos@unisinos.br||bmarocco@unisinos.br
_version_ 1800219585465548800