Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Verso e Reverso (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998 |
Resumo: | The objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings. |
id |
UNISINOS-2_746a235815fb8f12f4e57265eb90d5c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/6998 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISINOS-2 |
network_name_str |
Verso e Reverso (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourseAutoria e heterogeneidade no discurso amoroso de CarasThe objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings.O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar, segundo os pressupostos teóricos da Análise do Discurso de matriz francesa, os discursos produzidos acerca do amor em uma revista de circulação nacional, tentando compreender em que medida os autores desta seção assumem, ou não, os princípios de autoria e argumentação, investigando as marcas de heterogeneidade presentes nos discursos. Analisou-se quatro artigos publicados na coluna Amor, da revista Caras®. Em alguns recortes analisados, os autores, a partir de suas práticas como psicoterapeutas, mesclam seus posicionamentos pessoais com a experiência de seus pacientes. Em outros casos, relatam apenas as vivências de pacientes, distanciando-se das mesmas. Isso nos remete à discussão sobre a assunção da autoria nos profissionais da área psi, que não apenas devem trabalhar com questões do psiquismo humano, mas devem abrir-se à possibilidade de se colocarem como co-produtores de discursos e saberes, a partir do diálogo com o outro/Outro. Assim, a autoria, além de exigir que o sujeito se responsabilize pelo seu dizer, reclama do autor um trabalho com a heterogeneidade constitutiva da linguagem, uma vez que cabe à função-autor controlar a produção de sentidos das vozes que dialogam nos textos, criando a ilusão de unidade textual.Verso e Reverso2010-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/699810.4013/6998Verso e Reverso; v. 22 n. 51: Ano XXII - 2008/31806-6925reponame:Verso e Reverso (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:UNISINOSporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998/3983Comin, Fabio ScorsoliniPacífico, Soraya Maria Romanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-10T13:33:25Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/6998Revistahttp://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereversoPRIhttp://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/oaiperiodicos@unisinos.br||bmarocco@unisinos.br1806-69250103-1414opendoar:2014-03-10T13:33:25Verso e Reverso (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse Autoria e heterogeneidade no discurso amoroso de Caras |
title |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
spellingShingle |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse Comin, Fabio Scorsolini |
title_short |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
title_full |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
title_fullStr |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
title_sort |
Authorship and heterogeneity at Caras’ loving discourse |
author |
Comin, Fabio Scorsolini |
author_facet |
Comin, Fabio Scorsolini Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Comin, Fabio Scorsolini Pacífico, Soraya Maria Romano |
description |
The objective of this paper is to analyze, in context that the womb of French ‘approach’ Discourse Analysis, the discourses about love produced by a national magazine, trying to understand in which measure the authors of this section assume, or not, the principles of authorship and argumentation. Therefore, our intention is to investigate the discursive heterogeneity. Four articles, published in the “Love” section, at Caras®’ magazine, have been analyzed. In some sections, the authors start to mix their personal opinions with their patients’ experiences, based in the practice as psychotherapist. In other cases, they only report their patients’ experiences, keeping a distance from their patients. That reminds us of the discussion about the authorship of the psychological area, which not only must deal with human psychic issues, but must also open themselves to the possibility of placing themselves as co-producers of discourses and knowledge, starting from the dialogue with the other/Other. Thus, the authorship demands of the author a work with the heterogeneity constitutive on the language, as soon as the control of sense and the voices in the texts is function of the author, creating with that control the illusion of textual unity, more than to allow the subject to be answerable for their sayings. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998 10.4013/6998 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4013/6998 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/view/6998/3983 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Verso e Reverso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Verso e Reverso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Verso e Reverso; v. 22 n. 51: Ano XXII - 2008/3 1806-6925 reponame:Verso e Reverso (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:UNISINOS |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
UNISINOS |
institution |
UNISINOS |
reponame_str |
Verso e Reverso (Online) |
collection |
Verso e Reverso (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Verso e Reverso (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
periodicos@unisinos.br||bmarocco@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1800219585465548800 |