ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
Texto Completo: | https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/1971 |
Resumo: | Every city has the right of receiving a part of the tributary resources raised by the Union and by the State, which are denominated constitutional transfers. At the ICMS' distribution stage, the Ecological ICMS is destined to the cities where such environmental policies are adopted. The aim of this study was to research and investigate how the state of Minas Gerais distributes to its cities the financial resources from the ecological ICMS, furthermore analyze the criteria that were used to assess which values were received by the cities from this state. The methodology used in this study was descriptive, focusing on a comparative analysis of the criteria used in Minas Gerais to distribute the part-quota from the ICMS to all cities. A number of 36 cities had been analyzed for 6 years. The results showed that the ICMS quota-part contemplates 17 criteria. Among them, the environment criteria are the lowest one, reaching an index of 1,10 . Taking into consideration the period that this research was done, none of the cities had received the contribution called Mata Seca. Only 3 cities had received the set of Conservation and Sanitation unit. By the Conservation unit criteria, 12 cities had received the Ecological ICMS. By the Sanitation criteria, only 13 cities had received it. It shows that the prefectures from Minas Gerais have been losing the importance of the ecological ICMS and people who are supposed to be in charge of the cities' administration lack knowledge concerning the Robin Hood Law. |
id |
UNITAU-3_1ee479d58f088f1ae8adaf4878bec65d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/1971 |
network_acronym_str |
UNITAU-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATEICMS ECOLÓGICO: UMA ANÁLISE DO MODELO ADOTADO PELO ESTADO DE MINAS GERAISRecursos FinanceirosPolíticas PúblicasCota-parteFinancial ResourcesPublic PoliciesQuota-shareEvery city has the right of receiving a part of the tributary resources raised by the Union and by the State, which are denominated constitutional transfers. At the ICMS' distribution stage, the Ecological ICMS is destined to the cities where such environmental policies are adopted. The aim of this study was to research and investigate how the state of Minas Gerais distributes to its cities the financial resources from the ecological ICMS, furthermore analyze the criteria that were used to assess which values were received by the cities from this state. The methodology used in this study was descriptive, focusing on a comparative analysis of the criteria used in Minas Gerais to distribute the part-quota from the ICMS to all cities. A number of 36 cities had been analyzed for 6 years. The results showed that the ICMS quota-part contemplates 17 criteria. Among them, the environment criteria are the lowest one, reaching an index of 1,10 . Taking into consideration the period that this research was done, none of the cities had received the contribution called Mata Seca. Only 3 cities had received the set of Conservation and Sanitation unit. By the Conservation unit criteria, 12 cities had received the Ecological ICMS. By the Sanitation criteria, only 13 cities had received it. It shows that the prefectures from Minas Gerais have been losing the importance of the ecological ICMS and people who are supposed to be in charge of the cities' administration lack knowledge concerning the Robin Hood Law.Todo município brasileiro tem o direito a receber parte dos recursos tributários arrecadados pela União e pelo Estado, as chamadas transferências constitucionais. Na distribuição dos recursos do ICMS, o ICMS Ecológico é destinado aos municípios que adotam políticas ambientais. Os objetivos desta pesquisa foram investigar como Estado de Minas Gerais repassa aos municípios os recursos financeiros do ICMS Ecológico, analisar os critérios utilizados e avaliar quais os valores recebidos pelos municípios mineiros. A metodologia utilizada foi a descritiva, com foco na análise comparativa dos critérios utilizados em Minas Gerais para o repasse da Cota-parte do ICMS aos municípios mineiros. Foram 36 municípios envolvidos em um período de 6 anos de análise. Os resultados mostram que o repasse pelo Estado de Minas Gerais da Cota-parte do ICMS contempla 17 critérios. Entre estes, o critério Meio Ambiente com um índice de 1,10 é o menor entre os estados brasileiros. Considerando os municípios e o período analisado na pesquisa, nenhum município recebeu repasse a título do subcritério Mata Seca. Somente 3 municípios receberam repasse conjunto a título de Unidades de Conservação e Saneamento. Pelo subcritério Unidades de Conservação, 12 municípios receberam repasse do ICMS Ecológico. Pelo subcritério Saneamento, 13 municípios receberam repasse. Isso demonstra que as prefeituras municipais de Minas Gerais estão perdendo importância significativa do repasse do ICMS Ecológico e que os gestores municipais mineiros não possuem totais conhecimentos da Lei Robin Hood.Universidade de Taubaté2015-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/197110.54399/rbgdr.v11i3.1971Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2015)RBGDR; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2015)Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 11 n. 3 (2015)1809-239X10.54399/rbgdr.v11i3reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regionalinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/1971/470Fonseca, Reinaldo AparecidaRezende, José Luiz PereiraNazareth, Luiz Gustavo CamaranoFerreira, Roberto NascimentoAngotti, Marcelloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-10-27T19:56:34Zoai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/1971Revistahttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdrPUBhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/oai||monicafcarniello@gmail.com1809-239X1809-239Xopendoar:2015-10-27T19:56:34Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE ICMS ECOLÓGICO: UMA ANÁLISE DO MODELO ADOTADO PELO ESTADO DE MINAS GERAIS |
title |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
spellingShingle |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE Fonseca, Reinaldo Aparecida Recursos Financeiros Políticas Públicas Cota-parte Financial Resources Public Policies Quota-share |
title_short |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
title_full |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
title_fullStr |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
title_full_unstemmed |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
title_sort |
ECOLOGICAL ICMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT MODEL ADOPTED BY THE MINAS GERAIS STATE |
author |
Fonseca, Reinaldo Aparecida |
author_facet |
Fonseca, Reinaldo Aparecida Rezende, José Luiz Pereira Nazareth, Luiz Gustavo Camarano Ferreira, Roberto Nascimento Angotti, Marcello |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rezende, José Luiz Pereira Nazareth, Luiz Gustavo Camarano Ferreira, Roberto Nascimento Angotti, Marcello |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Reinaldo Aparecida Rezende, José Luiz Pereira Nazareth, Luiz Gustavo Camarano Ferreira, Roberto Nascimento Angotti, Marcello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Recursos Financeiros Políticas Públicas Cota-parte Financial Resources Public Policies Quota-share |
topic |
Recursos Financeiros Políticas Públicas Cota-parte Financial Resources Public Policies Quota-share |
description |
Every city has the right of receiving a part of the tributary resources raised by the Union and by the State, which are denominated constitutional transfers. At the ICMS' distribution stage, the Ecological ICMS is destined to the cities where such environmental policies are adopted. The aim of this study was to research and investigate how the state of Minas Gerais distributes to its cities the financial resources from the ecological ICMS, furthermore analyze the criteria that were used to assess which values were received by the cities from this state. The methodology used in this study was descriptive, focusing on a comparative analysis of the criteria used in Minas Gerais to distribute the part-quota from the ICMS to all cities. A number of 36 cities had been analyzed for 6 years. The results showed that the ICMS quota-part contemplates 17 criteria. Among them, the environment criteria are the lowest one, reaching an index of 1,10 . Taking into consideration the period that this research was done, none of the cities had received the contribution called Mata Seca. Only 3 cities had received the set of Conservation and Sanitation unit. By the Conservation unit criteria, 12 cities had received the Ecological ICMS. By the Sanitation criteria, only 13 cities had received it. It shows that the prefectures from Minas Gerais have been losing the importance of the ecological ICMS and people who are supposed to be in charge of the cities' administration lack knowledge concerning the Robin Hood Law. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/1971 10.54399/rbgdr.v11i3.1971 |
url |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/1971 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54399/rbgdr.v11i3.1971 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/1971/470 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Taubaté |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Taubaté |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2015) RBGDR; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2015) Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 11 n. 3 (2015) 1809-239X 10.54399/rbgdr.v11i3 reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) instacron:UNITAU |
instname_str |
Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
instacron_str |
UNITAU |
institution |
UNITAU |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
collection |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||monicafcarniello@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800220468632879104 |