THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Catapan, Anderson
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Malo, Zulema, Villavicencio, Guillermo Javier Dí­az, Cárdenas, Elsa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
Texto Completo: https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/2523
Resumo: The paper is written via a comparison of costs associated with the production of clean energy from swine waste in the Latin American countries of Brazil and Ecuador. Objective: The objective of the study is to study the financial viability of the use of a bio-digester in the two countries to allow for a comparison of the associated costs via cash flow analysis. Results: The results show that in order to meet financial viability allowing for a maximum 20% risk of investors losing money, that there is a need for bigger farms in Ecuador than in Brazil. Conclusion: The paper shows that by calculating the financial viability, a minimum number of swines are needed in each country. This is due to differing implementation costs in the two countries. Sustainability and conversation are only two of the positive results of generating energy in this way.
id UNITAU-3_cc3e6c8212bf6c227eac978480e07aaa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/2523
network_acronym_str UNITAU-3
network_name_str Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
repository_id_str
spelling THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHODVIABILIDADE FINANCEIRA PARA GERAÇÃO DE ENERGIA LIMPA A PARTIR DE DEJETOS DE SUÍNOS: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE BRASIL E EQUADOR COM O USO DA SIMULAÇÃO DE MONTE CARLOenergia limpasimulação de Monte Carlocustosviabilidadeclean energyMonte Carlo SimulationcostsviabilityThe paper is written via a comparison of costs associated with the production of clean energy from swine waste in the Latin American countries of Brazil and Ecuador. Objective: The objective of the study is to study the financial viability of the use of a bio-digester in the two countries to allow for a comparison of the associated costs via cash flow analysis. Results: The results show that in order to meet financial viability allowing for a maximum 20% risk of investors losing money, that there is a need for bigger farms in Ecuador than in Brazil. Conclusion: The paper shows that by calculating the financial viability, a minimum number of swines are needed in each country. This is due to differing implementation costs in the two countries. Sustainability and conversation are only two of the positive results of generating energy in this way.O documento foi escrito por meio de uma comparação dos custos associados à produção de energia limpa a partir de dejetos de suí­nos nos paí­ses latino-americanos do Brasil e do Equador. Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo é estudar a viabilidade financeira do uso de um bio-digestor nos dois paí­ses para permitir uma comparação entre os custos associados através de análise de fluxo de caixa. Resultados: Os resultados demonstram que, a fim de satisfazer a viabilidade financeira, que permita um risco máximo de 20% de investidores perder dinheiro, que existe uma necessidade para explorações de maiores dimensões do que no Equador no Brasil. Conclusão: O trabalho mostra que pelo cálculo da viabilidade financeira, são necessários um número mí­nimo de suí­nos em cada paí­s. Isto é devido aos diferentes custos de implementação dos dois paí­ses. Sustentabilidade e conversa são apenas dois dos resultados positivos de geração de energia dessa forma.Universidade de Taubaté2016-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/252310.54399/rbgdr.v12i3.2523Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2016)RBGDR; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2016)Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 12 n. 3 (2016)1809-239X10.54399/rbgdr.v12i3reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regionalinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/2523/542Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCatapan, AndersonMalo, ZulemaVillavicencio, Guillermo Javier Dí­azCárdenas, Elsa2016-10-22T17:42:08Zoai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/2523Revistahttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdrPUBhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/oai||monicafcarniello@gmail.com1809-239X1809-239Xopendoar:2016-10-22T17:42:08Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
VIABILIDADE FINANCEIRA PARA GERAÇÃO DE ENERGIA LIMPA A PARTIR DE DEJETOS DE SUÍNOS: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE BRASIL E EQUADOR COM O USO DA SIMULAÇÃO DE MONTE CARLO
title THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
spellingShingle THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
Catapan, Anderson
energia limpa
simulação de Monte Carlo
custos
viabilidade
clean energy
Monte Carlo Simulation
costs
viability
title_short THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
title_full THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
title_fullStr THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
title_full_unstemmed THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
title_sort THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY FOR CLEAN ENERGY GENERATION FROM SWINE WASTE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND ECUADOR VIA A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
author Catapan, Anderson
author_facet Catapan, Anderson
Malo, Zulema
Villavicencio, Guillermo Javier Dí­az
Cárdenas, Elsa
author_role author
author2 Malo, Zulema
Villavicencio, Guillermo Javier Dí­az
Cárdenas, Elsa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Catapan, Anderson
Malo, Zulema
Villavicencio, Guillermo Javier Dí­az
Cárdenas, Elsa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv energia limpa
simulação de Monte Carlo
custos
viabilidade
clean energy
Monte Carlo Simulation
costs
viability
topic energia limpa
simulação de Monte Carlo
custos
viabilidade
clean energy
Monte Carlo Simulation
costs
viability
description The paper is written via a comparison of costs associated with the production of clean energy from swine waste in the Latin American countries of Brazil and Ecuador. Objective: The objective of the study is to study the financial viability of the use of a bio-digester in the two countries to allow for a comparison of the associated costs via cash flow analysis. Results: The results show that in order to meet financial viability allowing for a maximum 20% risk of investors losing money, that there is a need for bigger farms in Ecuador than in Brazil. Conclusion: The paper shows that by calculating the financial viability, a minimum number of swines are needed in each country. This is due to differing implementation costs in the two countries. Sustainability and conversation are only two of the positive results of generating energy in this way.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/2523
10.54399/rbgdr.v12i3.2523
url https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/2523
identifier_str_mv 10.54399/rbgdr.v12i3.2523
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/2523/542
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Taubaté
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Taubaté
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2016)
RBGDR; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2016)
Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 12 n. 3 (2016)
1809-239X
10.54399/rbgdr.v12i3
reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron:UNITAU
instname_str Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron_str UNITAU
institution UNITAU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
collection Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||monicafcarniello@gmail.com
_version_ 1800220469084815360

Registros relacionados