Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Steinmetz, Wilson
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595
Resumo: This study has as its object the precautionary measure of the Supreme Federal Court in ADPF 669 that suspended the advertising campaign “Brazil can not stop”. The compliance with the ADPF's requirement of subsidiarity in the case and the existence of the contested fact are analyzed and discussed. The granting of a precautionary measure to protect rights and assets that were already protected by urgent protection granted by the Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro in a public civil action indicates that the Federal Supreme Court, when facing cases related to Covid-19, intended to assume a role of political-institutional protagonist. The hypothesis is that this orientation was deliberately taken by the Federal Supreme Court in the face of conflicting visions and approaches in the field of political decisions, especially of the Executive Branch of the three spheres of the Federation, in the confrontation of Covid-19. The study has a heuristic and conjectural character towards new studies that have as object the set of Supreme Court decisions in the cases related to Covid-19.
id UNOESC-1_3b0bf7f41fca9c961d9f65d946588738
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/26595
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669Protagonismo político-institucional do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Covid-19: uma conjectura a partir da ADPF 669Covid-19Supreme Federal CourtADPF 669Political-institutional protagonismCovid-19Supremo Tribunal FederalADPF 669Protagonismo político-institucionalThis study has as its object the precautionary measure of the Supreme Federal Court in ADPF 669 that suspended the advertising campaign “Brazil can not stop”. The compliance with the ADPF's requirement of subsidiarity in the case and the existence of the contested fact are analyzed and discussed. The granting of a precautionary measure to protect rights and assets that were already protected by urgent protection granted by the Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro in a public civil action indicates that the Federal Supreme Court, when facing cases related to Covid-19, intended to assume a role of political-institutional protagonist. The hypothesis is that this orientation was deliberately taken by the Federal Supreme Court in the face of conflicting visions and approaches in the field of political decisions, especially of the Executive Branch of the three spheres of the Federation, in the confrontation of Covid-19. The study has a heuristic and conjectural character towards new studies that have as object the set of Supreme Court decisions in the cases related to Covid-19.Este estudo tem por objeto a medida cautelar concedida pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal na ADPF 669 que suspendeu a campanha publicitária “O Brasil Não Pode Parar”. Analisam-se e discutem-se o atendimento do requisito da subsidiariedade da ADPF no caso e a existência do fato impugnado. A concessão de medida cautelar para proteger direitos e bens que já estavam protegidos por tutela de urgência deferida pela Justiça Federal do Rio de Janeiro em ação civil pública indica que o Supremo Tribunal Federal, no enfrentamento de casos relativos à Covid-19, pretendeu assumir um papel de protagonista político-institucional. A hipótese é de que essa orientação foi tomada de forma deliberada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal ante a existência de visões e abordagens conflitantes no campo das decisões políticas, especialmente do Poder Executivo das três esferas da Federação, no enfrentamento da Covid-19. O estudo tem caráter heurístico e conjectural em direção de novos estudos que tenham por objeto o conjunto das decisões do Supremo Tribunal nos casos relativos à Covid-19.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2020-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2659510.18593/ejjl.26595Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-5622179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595/15813https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595/15814Copyright (c) 2020 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSteinmetz, Wilson2022-08-16T14:00:57Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/26595Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2022-08-16T14:00:57Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
Protagonismo político-institucional do Supremo Tribunal Federal e Covid-19: uma conjectura a partir da ADPF 669
title Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
spellingShingle Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
Steinmetz, Wilson
Covid-19
Supreme Federal Court
ADPF 669
Political-institutional protagonism
Covid-19
Supremo Tribunal Federal
ADPF 669
Protagonismo político-institucional
title_short Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
title_full Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
title_fullStr Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
title_full_unstemmed Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
title_sort Political-institutional protagonism of the Supreme Federal Court and Covid-19: a conjecture from ADPF 669
author Steinmetz, Wilson
author_facet Steinmetz, Wilson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Steinmetz, Wilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Covid-19
Supreme Federal Court
ADPF 669
Political-institutional protagonism
Covid-19
Supremo Tribunal Federal
ADPF 669
Protagonismo político-institucional
topic Covid-19
Supreme Federal Court
ADPF 669
Political-institutional protagonism
Covid-19
Supremo Tribunal Federal
ADPF 669
Protagonismo político-institucional
description This study has as its object the precautionary measure of the Supreme Federal Court in ADPF 669 that suspended the advertising campaign “Brazil can not stop”. The compliance with the ADPF's requirement of subsidiarity in the case and the existence of the contested fact are analyzed and discussed. The granting of a precautionary measure to protect rights and assets that were already protected by urgent protection granted by the Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro in a public civil action indicates that the Federal Supreme Court, when facing cases related to Covid-19, intended to assume a role of political-institutional protagonist. The hypothesis is that this orientation was deliberately taken by the Federal Supreme Court in the face of conflicting visions and approaches in the field of political decisions, especially of the Executive Branch of the three spheres of the Federation, in the confrontation of Covid-19. The study has a heuristic and conjectural character towards new studies that have as object the set of Supreme Court decisions in the cases related to Covid-19.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595
10.18593/ejjl.26595
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.26595
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595/15813
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/26595/15814
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 551-562
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1800220447472615424

Registros relacionados