Usability evaluation of different door handles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Capítulo de livro |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228580 |
Resumo: | Ergonomic design of manual instruments aims the product usability. Frequently in different projects the variables analyzed involve force and gender influence. This sh1dy intended to evaluate maximum hand torque force and the associated effort perception of a simulated manual activity, namely, the simulation of a door opening with different kinds of door handles. 180 subjects have participated in the experiment (90 males and 90 females). Torque forces were collected with a force gauge and a static torque transducer. Data analysis was based in descriptive statistics and mean comparison analysis. The results indicated that male subjects performed mean torque forces significantly higher (P≤0.05) that female subjects. At effort perception level the results showed that on two types of door handles males presented a higher value and that in the other three types of door handles women presented a higher value of mean effort necessary to produce the maximum force torque. These results must be considered in the door handle design since, besides aesthetics, the shape must also privilege usability for all users facilitating in this way its daily tasks.. |
id |
UNSP_00b977eae0954aa66508cb8381f822bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228580 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Usability evaluation of different door handlesDoor handlesErgonomic designUsabilityErgonomic design of manual instruments aims the product usability. Frequently in different projects the variables analyzed involve force and gender influence. This sh1dy intended to evaluate maximum hand torque force and the associated effort perception of a simulated manual activity, namely, the simulation of a door opening with different kinds of door handles. 180 subjects have participated in the experiment (90 males and 90 females). Torque forces were collected with a force gauge and a static torque transducer. Data analysis was based in descriptive statistics and mean comparison analysis. The results indicated that male subjects performed mean torque forces significantly higher (P≤0.05) that female subjects. At effort perception level the results showed that on two types of door handles males presented a higher value and that in the other three types of door handles women presented a higher value of mean effort necessary to produce the maximum force torque. These results must be considered in the door handle design since, besides aesthetics, the shape must also privilege usability for all users facilitating in this way its daily tasks..Department of Design Faculty of Architecture Arts and Communication Univ. Estadual PaulistaErgonomics Department- Human Kinetics Faculty Technical University ofLisbonDepartment of Design Faculty of Architecture Arts and Communication Univ. Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Technical University ofLisbonPaschoarelli, Luis Carlos [UNESP]Santoi, Raquel2022-04-29T08:27:26Z2022-04-29T08:27:26Z2016-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart291-299Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, p. 291-299.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2285802-s2.0-85051990717Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAdvances in Cognitive Ergonomicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-17T18:29:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228580Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:26:10.946560Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
title |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
spellingShingle |
Usability evaluation of different door handles Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos [UNESP] Door handles Ergonomic design Usability |
title_short |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
title_full |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
title_fullStr |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
title_sort |
Usability evaluation of different door handles |
author |
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos [UNESP] Santoi, Raquel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santoi, Raquel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Technical University ofLisbon |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos [UNESP] Santoi, Raquel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Door handles Ergonomic design Usability |
topic |
Door handles Ergonomic design Usability |
description |
Ergonomic design of manual instruments aims the product usability. Frequently in different projects the variables analyzed involve force and gender influence. This sh1dy intended to evaluate maximum hand torque force and the associated effort perception of a simulated manual activity, namely, the simulation of a door opening with different kinds of door handles. 180 subjects have participated in the experiment (90 males and 90 females). Torque forces were collected with a force gauge and a static torque transducer. Data analysis was based in descriptive statistics and mean comparison analysis. The results indicated that male subjects performed mean torque forces significantly higher (P≤0.05) that female subjects. At effort perception level the results showed that on two types of door handles males presented a higher value and that in the other three types of door handles women presented a higher value of mean effort necessary to produce the maximum force torque. These results must be considered in the door handle design since, besides aesthetics, the shape must also privilege usability for all users facilitating in this way its daily tasks.. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-19 2022-04-29T08:27:26Z 2022-04-29T08:27:26Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart |
format |
bookPart |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, p. 291-299. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228580 2-s2.0-85051990717 |
identifier_str_mv |
Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, p. 291-299. 2-s2.0-85051990717 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228580 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
291-299 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129320279867392 |