A governança do sistema federal de alerta de risco de desastres associados a deslizamentos no Brasil

• Autor(a) principal: Bravo, Luciana Albuquerque
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234653
• topic: responsibility matrix; risk management; response capacity; public policies; matriz de responsabilidade; gestão de risco; capacidade de resposta; políticas públicas

Brazil is a signatory to several international commitments aimed at improving disasters risk prevention mechanisms and alert systems. This paper proposes to understand how the governance of landslide warning systems at federal level, is based on four dimensions: predictability, transparency, participation and accountability. For this, the following documents relating to federal legislation were considered: National Politics for Protection and Defense, National Disaster Risk Management and Responsiveness Plan, Multiannual Plans, Annals of the 1st National Seminar on Alerts of Cemaden, Project for Strengthening the National Strategy for Integrated Management in Natural Disaster Risks - GIDES, Practical Guide to The Use of Alerts of the Federal Government; in addition, two international documents - Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 and Multi-Hazards Early Warning Systems - Checklist (WMO); and the public policy instruments generated focusing on the axes of risk knowledge and monitoring. The analyses of the documents sought to answer whether it is possible to establish a responsibility matrix capable of guiding the public governance process for its management, based on the documental and legislative basis chosen. The methodology work employed consists of an analysis form for the comparison of documents composed of: principles, rules and objectives; competencies; standardization, protocol and methodologies; and resources – human, economic and financial. As a result, we found that the federal budget pieces (Multiannual Plans 2012/2016, 2017/2020 and 2021/2004) of the period highlighted for the research do not apply to the proposed methodology because they lack the elements of the analysis form. Other documents partially meet the topics provided for the methodology and, therefore, it was possible to establish the comparison of the governance dimensions present. We verified that it was not possible to achieve a Responsibility Matrix for governance because the assumptions for its structuring were absent. We propose the adoption of the cycle of public policies for the setting of steps aimed at improving the governance at federal level for landslides warning systems. Finally, we point out the possibility of future research with the use of the same methodology focused on the communication axes and response capacity, that should cover State and municipal documents to understand the alert system as a whole chain, since it is in the Municipal level, fundamentally, where occurs the greater impact actions regarding the vulnerable population to disasters.