Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP], Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP], Sandnes, Frode Eika
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633
Resumo: Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions.
id UNSP_01c7547e773918e10141ae0bc1f67f36
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200633
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairmentassistive technologysmart glassesStigmavisual impairmentwhite canePurpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions.Graduate Program in Design São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Computer Science Oslo Metropolitan UniversityInstitute of Technology Kristiania University CollegeGraduate Program in Design São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oslo Metropolitan UniversityKristiania University Collegedos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP]Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]Sandnes, Frode Eika2020-12-12T02:11:51Z2020-12-12T02:11:51Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.1748-31151748-3107http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20063310.1080/17483107.2020.17683082-s2.0-85086857241Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-17T18:29:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200633Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:59:54.859957Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
title Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
spellingShingle Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]
assistive technology
smart glasses
Stigma
visual impairment
white cane
title_short Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
title_full Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
title_fullStr Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
title_sort Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
author dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]
author_facet dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]
Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP]
Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]
Sandnes, Frode Eika
author_role author
author2 Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP]
Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]
Sandnes, Frode Eika
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Oslo Metropolitan University
Kristiania University College
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]
Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP]
Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]
Sandnes, Frode Eika
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv assistive technology
smart glasses
Stigma
visual impairment
white cane
topic assistive technology
smart glasses
Stigma
visual impairment
white cane
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:11:51Z
2020-12-12T02:11:51Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.
1748-3115
1748-3107
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633
10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
2-s2.0-85086857241
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633
identifier_str_mv Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.
1748-3115
1748-3107
10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308
2-s2.0-85086857241
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129480297807872