Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions. |
id |
UNSP_01c7547e773918e10141ae0bc1f67f36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200633 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairmentassistive technologysmart glassesStigmavisual impairmentwhite canePurpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions.Graduate Program in Design São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Computer Science Oslo Metropolitan UniversityInstitute of Technology Kristiania University CollegeGraduate Program in Design São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oslo Metropolitan UniversityKristiania University Collegedos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP]Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP]Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]Sandnes, Frode Eika2020-12-12T02:11:51Z2020-12-12T02:11:51Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.1748-31151748-3107http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20063310.1080/17483107.2020.17683082-s2.0-85086857241Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-17T18:29:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200633Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:59:54.859957Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
title |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
spellingShingle |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP] assistive technology smart glasses Stigma visual impairment white cane |
title_short |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
title_full |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
title_fullStr |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
title_sort |
Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment |
author |
dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP] |
author_facet |
dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP] Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP] Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP] Sandnes, Frode Eika |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP] Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP] Sandnes, Frode Eika |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Oslo Metropolitan University Kristiania University College |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
dos Santos, Aline Darc Piculo [UNESP] Ferrari, Ana Lya Moya [UNESP] Medola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP] Sandnes, Frode Eika |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
assistive technology smart glasses Stigma visual impairment white cane |
topic |
assistive technology smart glasses Stigma visual impairment white cane |
description |
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses. Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices. Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants perceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device. Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were positively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Understanding the factors that influence the perceived stigma associated with assistive technology can help designers and developers to reduce assistive technology abandonment and perceived stigma. Designers need to consider both functionality and aesthetics. While functionality is crucial for the users’ adaptation, aesthetics is important for the users’ positive perceptions. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:11:51Z 2020-12-12T02:11:51Z 2020-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308 Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 1748-3115 1748-3107 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633 10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308 2-s2.0-85086857241 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200633 |
identifier_str_mv |
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 1748-3115 1748-3107 10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308 2-s2.0-85086857241 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129480297807872 |