Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161856116 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157761 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTPurpose: to carry out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the prolongations of adults who stutter and who not stutter.Methods: participants were divided into two groups: Research Group (RG, 15 adults who stutter) and Control Group (GC, 15 fluent adults). Procedures were: fluency assessment, Stuttering Severity Instrument and quantitative and qualitative analyzes of the prolongations.Results: there was a greater number of non hesitative prolongations in RG, whereas CG showed more hesitative prolongations in relation to the total of disfluencies. Non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in the initial and monosyllabic words, and in the medial position of the sentence in RG. Regarding the muscular tension and duration, a difference was observed for the muscular tension in the non hesitative prolongations, with higher mean value for RG.Conclusion: non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in RG, in initial words, monosyllables, and medial position of the sentence. Qualitatively, the muscular tension was a typical characteristic of non hesitative prolongations in RG. No differences were found for hesitative prolongations between the groups in relation to the frequency of the total of speech, the position of prolongations in the words and in the sentences, and for the qualitative characteristics, regarding to muscular tension and duration. |
id |
UNSP_07db3d4348f806b03c96fca1370901ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157761 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueiraProlongations in the speech of adults who do and do not stutterSpeech Language and Hearing SciencesSpeechStutteringSpeech DisordersEvaluationAdultFonoaudiologiaFalaGagueiraDistúrbios da FalaAvaliaçãoAdultoABSTRACTPurpose: to carry out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the prolongations of adults who stutter and who not stutter.Methods: participants were divided into two groups: Research Group (RG, 15 adults who stutter) and Control Group (GC, 15 fluent adults). Procedures were: fluency assessment, Stuttering Severity Instrument and quantitative and qualitative analyzes of the prolongations.Results: there was a greater number of non hesitative prolongations in RG, whereas CG showed more hesitative prolongations in relation to the total of disfluencies. Non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in the initial and monosyllabic words, and in the medial position of the sentence in RG. Regarding the muscular tension and duration, a difference was observed for the muscular tension in the non hesitative prolongations, with higher mean value for RG.Conclusion: non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in RG, in initial words, monosyllables, and medial position of the sentence. Qualitatively, the muscular tension was a typical characteristic of non hesitative prolongations in RG. No differences were found for hesitative prolongations between the groups in relation to the frequency of the total of speech, the position of prolongations in the words and in the sentences, and for the qualitative characteristics, regarding to muscular tension and duration.RESUMOObjetivo: realizar uma análise quantitativa e qualitativa dos prolongamentos de adultos com e sem gagueira.Métodos: os participantes foram divididos em: Grupo de Pesquisa (GP, 15 adultos com gagueira) e Grupo Controle (GC, 15 fluentes). Os procedimentos utilizados foram: avaliação da fluência, Instrumento de Gravidade da Gagueira e análises quantitativa e qualitativa dos prolongamentos.Resultados: GP mostrou maior número de prolongamentos não hesitativos, enquanto que GC mostrou maior ocorrência de prolongamentos hesitativos em relação ao total das disfluências. Prolongamentos não hesitativos ocorreram com maior frequência na palavra inicial e monossilábica, bem como na posição medial da frase para GP. Em relação à tensão muscular e duração, observou-se diferença apenas para a tensão muscular nos prolongamentos não hesitativos com maior média de ocorrência para GP.Conclusão: os prolongamentos não hesitativos ocorreram com maior frequência no GP, nas palavras iniciais, monossílabos e na posição medial da frase. Qualitativamente a tensão muscular foi uma característica típica dos prolongamentos não hesitativos no GP. Com relação aos prolongamentos hesitativos houve semelhança entre os adultos dos dois grupos quanto à frequência em relação ao total da fala, a posição dos prolongamentos nas palavras e nas frases e nos aspectos qualitativos, relacionados a tensão muscular e duração.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Filoso fia e CiênciasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Filoso fia e CiênciasABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade OrofacialUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva, Pâmila Bento DaFabron, Eliana Maria GradinPicoloto, Luana AltranOliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti De2018-11-12T17:26:49Z2018-11-12T17:26:49Z2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1141-1150application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161856116Revista CEFAC. ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial, v. 18, n. 5, p. 1141-1150, 2016.1516-1846http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15776110.1590/1982-021620161856116S1516-18462016000501141S1516-18462016000501141.pdf05594836302506310000-0003-0321-5093SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista CEFACinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-20T06:04:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157761Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:24:03.724144Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira Prolongations in the speech of adults who do and do not stutter |
title |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
spellingShingle |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira Silva, Pâmila Bento Da Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Speech Stuttering Speech Disorders Evaluation Adult Fonoaudiologia Fala Gagueira Distúrbios da Fala Avaliação Adulto |
title_short |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
title_full |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
title_fullStr |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
title_sort |
Prolongamentos na fala de adultos com e sem gagueira |
author |
Silva, Pâmila Bento Da |
author_facet |
Silva, Pâmila Bento Da Fabron, Eliana Maria Gradin Picoloto, Luana Altran Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti De |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fabron, Eliana Maria Gradin Picoloto, Luana Altran Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti De |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Pâmila Bento Da Fabron, Eliana Maria Gradin Picoloto, Luana Altran Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti De |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Speech Stuttering Speech Disorders Evaluation Adult Fonoaudiologia Fala Gagueira Distúrbios da Fala Avaliação Adulto |
topic |
Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Speech Stuttering Speech Disorders Evaluation Adult Fonoaudiologia Fala Gagueira Distúrbios da Fala Avaliação Adulto |
description |
ABSTRACTPurpose: to carry out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the prolongations of adults who stutter and who not stutter.Methods: participants were divided into two groups: Research Group (RG, 15 adults who stutter) and Control Group (GC, 15 fluent adults). Procedures were: fluency assessment, Stuttering Severity Instrument and quantitative and qualitative analyzes of the prolongations.Results: there was a greater number of non hesitative prolongations in RG, whereas CG showed more hesitative prolongations in relation to the total of disfluencies. Non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in the initial and monosyllabic words, and in the medial position of the sentence in RG. Regarding the muscular tension and duration, a difference was observed for the muscular tension in the non hesitative prolongations, with higher mean value for RG.Conclusion: non hesitative prolongations occurred more frequently in RG, in initial words, monosyllables, and medial position of the sentence. Qualitatively, the muscular tension was a typical characteristic of non hesitative prolongations in RG. No differences were found for hesitative prolongations between the groups in relation to the frequency of the total of speech, the position of prolongations in the words and in the sentences, and for the qualitative characteristics, regarding to muscular tension and duration. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-01 2018-11-12T17:26:49Z 2018-11-12T17:26:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161856116 Revista CEFAC. ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial, v. 18, n. 5, p. 1141-1150, 2016. 1516-1846 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157761 10.1590/1982-021620161856116 S1516-18462016000501141 S1516-18462016000501141.pdf 0559483630250631 0000-0003-0321-5093 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161856116 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157761 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC. ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial, v. 18, n. 5, p. 1141-1150, 2016. 1516-1846 10.1590/1982-021620161856116 S1516-18462016000501141 S1516-18462016000501141.pdf 0559483630250631 0000-0003-0321-5093 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1141-1150 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128508529999872 |