Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849 |
Resumo: | Intercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N. |
id |
UNSP_07f74185f89900d53935f4d719d4630b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209849 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food productionOryza sativa L.Brachiaria spp.Megathyrsus maximusIntercropping cropsSustainable agroecosystemIntercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)UNESP, Dept Crop Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilNIOO KNAW, Dept Microbial Ecol, Netherlands Inst Ecol, Wageningen, NetherlandsFed Univ Jatai, UFJ, Campus Riachuelo, Jatai, Go, BrazilUNESP, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilARS, USDA, NCSU Campus, Raleigh, NC USAAgron Inst Campinas IAC, Soils & Environm Resources Ctr, IAC, Campinas, SP, BrazilUNESP, Dept Crop Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)NIOO KNAWFed Univ JataiARSAgron Inst Campinas IACCrusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP]Costa, Claudio H. M.Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP]Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP]Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]Franzluebbers, Alan J.Cantarella, Heitor2021-06-25T12:31:15Z2021-06-25T12:31:15Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021.0378-4290http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20984910.1016/j.fer.2020.108008WOS:00060457690000497909982126355630000-0003-1854-2927Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengField Crops Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:55:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209849Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:41:43.116369Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
title |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
spellingShingle |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP] Oryza sativa L. Brachiaria spp. Megathyrsus maximus Intercropping crops Sustainable agroecosystem |
title_short |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
title_full |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
title_fullStr |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
title_sort |
Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production |
author |
Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP] Momesso, Letusa [UNESP] Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP] Costa, Claudio H. M. Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP] Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP] Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP] Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP] Costa, Ciniro [UNESP] Franzluebbers, Alan J. Cantarella, Heitor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Momesso, Letusa [UNESP] Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP] Costa, Claudio H. M. Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP] Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP] Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP] Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP] Costa, Ciniro [UNESP] Franzluebbers, Alan J. Cantarella, Heitor |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) NIOO KNAW Fed Univ Jatai ARS Agron Inst Campinas IAC |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP] Momesso, Letusa [UNESP] Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP] Costa, Claudio H. M. Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP] Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP] Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP] Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP] Costa, Ciniro [UNESP] Franzluebbers, Alan J. Cantarella, Heitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Oryza sativa L. Brachiaria spp. Megathyrsus maximus Intercropping crops Sustainable agroecosystem |
topic |
Oryza sativa L. Brachiaria spp. Megathyrsus maximus Intercropping crops Sustainable agroecosystem |
description |
Intercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T12:31:15Z 2021-06-25T12:31:15Z 2021-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008 Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021. 0378-4290 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849 10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008 WOS:000604576900004 9790998212635563 0000-0003-1854-2927 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849 |
identifier_str_mv |
Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021. 0378-4290 10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008 WOS:000604576900004 9790998212635563 0000-0003-1854-2927 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Field Crops Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
12 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128551089602560 |