Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Momesso, Letusa [UNESP], Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP], Costa, Claudio H. M., Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP], Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP], Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP], Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP], Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP], Costa, Ciniro [UNESP], Franzluebbers, Alan J., Cantarella, Heitor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849
Resumo: Intercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N.
id UNSP_07f74185f89900d53935f4d719d4630b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209849
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food productionOryza sativa L.Brachiaria spp.Megathyrsus maximusIntercropping cropsSustainable agroecosystemIntercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)UNESP, Dept Crop Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilNIOO KNAW, Dept Microbial Ecol, Netherlands Inst Ecol, Wageningen, NetherlandsFed Univ Jatai, UFJ, Campus Riachuelo, Jatai, Go, BrazilUNESP, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilARS, USDA, NCSU Campus, Raleigh, NC USAAgron Inst Campinas IAC, Soils & Environm Resources Ctr, IAC, Campinas, SP, BrazilUNESP, Dept Crop Sci, Coll Agr Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP, Dept Anim Nutr & Breeding, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)NIOO KNAWFed Univ JataiARSAgron Inst Campinas IACCrusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP]Costa, Claudio H. M.Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP]Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP]Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]Franzluebbers, Alan J.Cantarella, Heitor2021-06-25T12:31:15Z2021-06-25T12:31:15Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021.0378-4290http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20984910.1016/j.fer.2020.108008WOS:00060457690000497909982126355630000-0003-1854-2927Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengField Crops Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:55:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209849Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:41:43.116369Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
title Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
spellingShingle Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
Oryza sativa L.
Brachiaria spp.
Megathyrsus maximus
Intercropping crops
Sustainable agroecosystem
title_short Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
title_full Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
title_fullStr Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
title_full_unstemmed Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
title_sort Upland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
author Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
author_facet Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP]
Costa, Claudio H. M.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Franzluebbers, Alan J.
Cantarella, Heitor
author_role author
author2 Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP]
Costa, Claudio H. M.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Franzluebbers, Alan J.
Cantarella, Heitor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
NIOO KNAW
Fed Univ Jatai
ARS
Agron Inst Campinas IAC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crusciol, Carlos A. C. [UNESP]
Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Portugal, Jose R. [UNESP]
Costa, Claudio H. M.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Costa, Nidia R. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, Andre M. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Vitor A. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Franzluebbers, Alan J.
Cantarella, Heitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oryza sativa L.
Brachiaria spp.
Megathyrsus maximus
Intercropping crops
Sustainable agroecosystem
topic Oryza sativa L.
Brachiaria spp.
Megathyrsus maximus
Intercropping crops
Sustainable agroecosystem
description Intercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T12:31:15Z
2021-06-25T12:31:15Z
2021-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021.
0378-4290
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849
10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
WOS:000604576900004
9790998212635563
0000-0003-1854-2927
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849
identifier_str_mv Field Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021.
0378-4290
10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
WOS:000604576900004
9790998212635563
0000-0003-1854-2927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Field Crops Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128551089602560